Dataset Information

Immunosuppression for membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.

ABSTRACT: The efficacy and safety of immunosuppression for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) with nephrotic syndrome are still controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed.The Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, Chinese Database, and Clinical Trial Registries (June 2012) were searched to identify RCTs investigating the effect of immunosuppression on adults with IMN and nephrotic syndrome.This review was an update (36 RCTs, 1762 participants) of the 2004 version (18 RCTs, 1025 participants). Immunosuppression significantly reduced all-cause mortality or ESRD (15 RCTs, 791 participants; risk ratio, 0.58 [95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.95]; P=0.03). However, the result was not consistent when prespecified subgroup analyses were undertaken. Immunosuppression increased complete or partial remission (CR + PR) (16 RCTs, 864 participants; 1.31 [1.01-1.70]; P=0.04) but resulted in more withdrawals or hospitalizations (16 RCTs, 880 participants; 5.35 [2.19-13.02]; P=0.002). Corticosteroids combined with alkylating agents significantly reduced all-cause mortality or ESRD (8 RCTs, 448 participants; 0.44 [0.26-0.75]; P=0.002) and increased CR + PR (7 RCTs, 422 participants; 1.46 [1.13-1.89]; P=0.004) but led to more adverse events (4 RCTs, 303 participants; 4.20 [1.15-15.32]; P=0.03). Cyclophosphamide was safer than chlorambucil (3 RCTs, 147 participants; 0.48 [0.26-0.90]; P=0.02). Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil failed to show superiority over alkylating agents. Tacrolimus and adrenocorticotropic hormone significantly reduced proteinuria.Alkylating agents plus corticosteroids had long-term and short-term benefits for adult IMN, but resulted in more withdrawals or hospitalizations.

SUBMITTER: Chen Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3641615 | biostudies-other | 2013 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Immunosuppression for membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.

Chen Yizhi Y Schieppati Arrigo A Cai Guangyan G Chen Xiangmei X Zamora Javier J Giuliano Giovanni A GA Braun Norbert N Perna Annalisa A

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 20130228 5

<h4>Background and objectives</h4>The efficacy and safety of immunosuppression for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) with nephrotic syndrome are still controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed.<h4>Design, setting, participants, & measurements</h4>The Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, Chinese Database, and Clinical Trial Registries (June 2012) were searched to identify RCTs investigating the effect of immunosuppression on adult ...[more]

PMID: 23449768

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIdiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is a rare autoimmune disorder that causes nephrotic syndromes in adults. Conventional immunosuppressive therapies often exhibit limited efficacy in achieving remission and may result in notable adverse reactions, warranting the exploration of novel therapeutic approaches for IMN treatment. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which is extensively used for kidney disease management, is a promising alternative.ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of TCM alone or in combination with Western medicine for the management of patients diagnosed with IMN.MethodsThis study employed a systematic search of English and Chinese electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the application of TCM in the treatment of IMN. RCTs that met the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessed the safety and efficacy of TCM alone or in combination with Western medicine in patients with IMN were included in the analysis. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by using a risk-of-bias tool. All statistical analyses were performed using the RevMan software (version 5.4.2). The evidence was evaluated on the https://www.gradepro.org/website.ResultsThis study included 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1982 patients with moderate methodological quality that met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that, compared to Western medicine alone therapy, the use of TCM alone or in combination with Western medicine significantly improved total remission (TR) rate (risk ratios [RR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.46, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001), complete remission (CR) rate (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.15, I2 = 0, P < 0.00001), partial remission (PR) rate (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.161.40, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001), and serum albumin (ALB) levels (MD: 4.05, 95% CI: 3.02-5.09, I2 = 91%, P < 0.00001). TCM alone or in combination with Western medicine also reduced proteinuria levels (mean difference [MD]: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.30 to -0.79, I2 = 95%, P < 0.00001), serum creatinine (SCr) levels (MD: 7.47, 95% CI: 13.70 to -1.24, I2 = 97%, P = 0.02), and serum antibodies against M-type phospholipase A2 receptor levels (aPLA2Rab) (MD: 19.24, 95% CI: 33.56 to -4.93, I2 = 87%, P = 0.008). Moreover, the efficacy of combined TCM and Western medicine is superior to that of Western medicine alone in reducing the incidence of infection, hepatotoxicity, and thrombosis. Although the primary and secondary outcomes were consistent, the evidence was generally moderate.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that TCM alone or in combination with Western medicine may be a feasible alternative therapeutic approach for the treatment of IMN. Nevertheless, additional, rigorously designed, high-quality, and extensive clinical trials are imperative to provide substantial evidence regarding the effectiveness of TCM in managing IMN.

Project description:Background: Currently, the optimal therapy plan for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains controversial as there has been no comprehensive and systematic comparison of therapy plans for IMN. Therefore, in this study, a Bayesian meta-analysis was used to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of various intervention plans involving traditional Chinese medicine TWM in the treatment of IMN. Methods: An electronic search in 7 databases was conducted from their inception to August 2022 for all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of various intervention plans for IMN. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed by using software R, and the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) probability curve was plotted for each outcome indicator to rank the efficacy and safety of different intervention plans. Results: A total of 30 RCTs were included, involving 13 interventions. The results showed that (1) in terms of total remission (TR), ① GC + CNI + TWM was the best effective among all plans, and the addition and subtraction plan of CNI + TWM was the best effective for IMN; ② All plans involving TWM were more effective than GG; ③ Among monotherapy plans for IMN, TWM was more effective distinctly than GC, while TWM and CNI were similarly effective; ④ Among multidrug therapy plans for IMN, the addition of TWM to previously established therapy plans made the original plans more effective; ⑤The efficacy of combining TWM with other plans was superior to that of TWM alone. (2) In terms of lowering 24 h-UTP, GC + TWM was the best effective and more effective than TWM. (3) In terms of safety, there was no statistically significant difference between all groups. However, CNI + TWM was the safest. No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in all the included studies. Conclusion: The addition of TWM may be beneficial to patients with IMN. It may enhance the efficacy of previously established treatment protocols without leading to additional safety risks. In particular, GC + CNI + TWM, GC + TWM, and CNI + TWM with better efficacy and higher safety can be preferred in clinical decision-making as the therapy plans for IMN.

Project description:We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of alprostadil in the treatment of hypertensive nephropathy. Seven online databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI] database, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Information Resource Integration Service Platform [cqVIP], and China Biology Medicine Disc [SinoMed]) were searched from inception to January 31, 2022, and a set of clinical indicators for hypertensive nephropathy was selected. The main indicators were 24-h urinary protein, serum creatinine, endogenous serum creatinine clearance rate, blood urea nitrogen, cystatin C, and mean arterial pressure. The methodological quality of the included trials was analyzed using a risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane Manual guidelines, and a meta-analysis was performed. A random-effects model was implemented to pool the results. A total of 20 randomized controlled trials involving 1441 patients with hypertensive nephropathy were included in this review. Our findings showed that alprostadil had a positive effect on 24-h urinary protein (mean difference [MD] = -0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.16, -0.42], P < 0.0001), serum creatinine (MD = -13.83, 95% CI [-19.34, -8.32], P < 0.00001), endogenous serum creatinine clearance rate (MD = 6.09, 95% CI [3.59, 8.59], P < 0.00001), blood urea nitrogen (MD = -6.42, 95% CI [-8.63, -4.21], P < 0.00001), cystatin C (MD = -0.26, 95% CI [-0.34, -0.18], P < 0.00001), and mean arterial pressure levels(MD = -13.65, 95% CI [-16.08, -11.21], P < 0.00001). Compared to conventional treatment alone, alprostadil combined with conventional treatment can improve renal function in patients with hypertensive nephropathy more effectively. However, additional large-scale, multicenter, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these results. This is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of alprostadil for hypertensive nephropathy, and the results may guide clinical practice.

Project description:BackgroundIdiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults involving multiple targets and factors. The effect of conservative nonimmunosuppressive or immunosuppressive therapies is unsatisfactory and with many side effects. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) can regulate immune function and improve kidney function.PurposeTo evaluate the total effective rate, curative rate, recurrence rate and adverse events of TCM alone or TCM as an adjunctive therapy for IMN.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing either TCM alone or the combination of TCM to western medicine (WM) therapies for patients with IMN were retrieved by searching English and Chinese database. Risk of bias summary was used to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies. Dichotomous data were presented using odds ratios (OR). The primary outcome measure was the total effective rate. Secondary outcomes included curative rate, recurrence rate and adverse events.Results29 RCTs involving 1883 participants met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between the therapy of TCM alone and WM on the total effective rates (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 0.80-4.98; P = 0.14) and curative rate (OR: 1.66; 95%CI: 0.66-4.22; p = 0.28). However, compared to basic treatment or immunosuppressive therapies alone, results showed that TCM as an adjunctive therapy had beneficial effects on the total effective rate (OR: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.38-4.86; P = 0.003 and OR: 3.01; 95% CI: 2.25-4.04; P < 0.00001) and curative rate (OR: 3.01; 95%CI: 1.24-7.28; p = 0.01 and OR: 1.73; 95%CI: 1.10-2.71; p = 0.02). In addition, the combination of TCM treatment could reduce the recurrence rate (OR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.12-0.68; P = 0.004) and adverse reactions (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.27-0.54; p < 0.00001).ConclusionThe results indicate that TCM is well-tolerated for the treatment of IMN. However, there remains a need for large-scale and high-quality trials.

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of this study was to report the prevalence and mortality associated with anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN) through a systematic review of the literature.MethodsElectronic searches were conducted in the Medline and EMBASE databases, and manual searches were performed in the reference lists of the identified studies. The studies were selected by two independent researchers, first by evaluating the titles and abstracts and then by reading the complete texts of the identified studies. Case series, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies and case-control studies reporting the prevalence and factors associated with ARN were selected. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses of the prevalence of ARN and 5-year mortality using the random effects model were performed when possible. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic.ResultsFive studies were included. Prevalence of ARN ranged from 19% to 63% among the four included cohort studies. Meta-analysis of these resulted in high heterogeneity [I 2 96%, summary effect 31%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22-42%]. Subgroup meta-analysis yielded an ARN prevalence of 20% among studies that included patients with fewer comorbidities (I 2 12%; 95% CI 19-22%). In a direct comparison, meta-analysis of the 5-year mortality rate between anticoagulated patients who had experienced ARN and anticoagulated patients without ARN, patients with ARN were 91% more likely to die (risk ratio = 1.91; 95% CI 1.22-3; I 2 87%). Risk factors for ARN that were reported in the literature included initial excessive anticoagulation, chronic kidney disease, age, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and heart failure.ConclusionsARN studies are scarce and heterogeneous, and present significant methodological limitations. The high prevalence of ARN reported herein suggests that this entity is underdiagnosed in clinical practice. Mortality in patients with ARN seems to be high compared with patients without this condition in observational studies.

Project description:BackgroundRecruitment for clinical trials continues to be a challenge, as patient recruitment is the single biggest cause of trial delays. Around 80% of trials fail to meet the initial enrollment target and timeline, and these delays can result in lost revenue of as much as US $8 million per day for drug developing companies.ObjectiveThis study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effectiveness of online recruitment of participants for clinical trials compared with traditional in-clinic/offline recruitment methods.MethodsData on recruitment rates (the average number of patients enrolled in the study per month and per day of active recruitment) and conversion rates (the percentage of participants screened who proceed to enroll into the clinical trial), as well as study characteristics and patient demographics were collected from the included studies. Differences in online and offline recruitment rates and conversion rates were examined using random effects models. Further, a nonparametric paired Wilcoxon test was used for additional analysis on the cost-effectiveness of online patient recruitment. All data analyses were conducted in R language, and P<.05 was considered significant.ResultsIn total, 3861 articles were screened for inclusion. Of these, 61 studies were included in the review, and 23 of these were further included in the meta-analysis. We found online recruitment to be significantly more effective with respect to the recruitment rate for active days of recruitment, where 100% (7/7) of the studies included had a better online recruitment rate compared with offline recruitment (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 4.17, P=.04). When examining the entire recruitment period in months we found that 52% (12/23) of the studies had a better online recruitment rate compared with the offline recruitment rate (IRR 1.11, P=.71). For cost-effectiveness, we found that online recruitment had a significantly lower cost per enrollee compared with offline recruitment (US $72 vs US $199, P=.04). Finally, we found that 69% (9/13) of studies had significantly better offline conversion rates compared with online conversion rates (risk ratio 0.8, P=.02).ConclusionsTargeting potential participants using online remedies is an effective approach for patient recruitment for clinical research. Online recruitment was both superior in regard to time efficiency and cost-effectiveness compared with offline recruitment. In contrast, offline recruitment outperformed online recruitment with respect to conversion rate.

Dataset Information

Immunosuppression for membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.

Publications

Immunosuppression for membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets