Dataset Information

Unsolved issues in the management of high blood pressure in acute ischemic stroke.

ABSTRACT: High blood pressure is common in acute stroke patients. Very high as well as very low blood pressure is associated with poor outcome. Spontaneous fall of blood pressure within the first few days after stroke was associated both with neurological improvement and impairment. Several randomized trials investigated the pharmacological reduction of blood pressure versus control. Most trials showed no significant difference in their primary outcome apart from the INWEST trial which found an increase of poor outcome when giving intravenous nimodipine. Nevertheless, useful information can be extracted from the published data to help guide the clinician's decision. Blood pressure should only be lowered when it is clearly elevated, and early after onset, reduction should be moderate but may be achieved rapidly. No clear recommendations can be given on the substances to use; however, care should be taken with intravenous calcium channel blockers and angiotensin receptor antagonists. Two ongoing randomized trials will help to solve the questions on blood pressure management in acute stroke.

SUBMITTER: Hubert GJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3655558 | biostudies-other | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Unsolved issues in the management of high blood pressure in acute ischemic stroke.

Hubert Gordian J GJ Müller-Barna Peter P Haberl Roman L RL

International journal of hypertension 20130423

High blood pressure is common in acute stroke patients. Very high as well as very low blood pressure is associated with poor outcome. Spontaneous fall of blood pressure within the first few days after stroke was associated both with neurological improvement and impairment. Several randomized trials investigated the pharmacological reduction of blood pressure versus control. Most trials showed no significant difference in their primary outcome apart from the INWEST trial which found an increase o ...[more]

PMID: 23710338

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and purposeElevated blood pressure (BP) in acute ischemic stroke is common. A raised BP is related to mortality and disability, yet excessive BP lowering can be detrimental. The optimal BP management in acute ischemic stroke remains insufficient and relies on expert consensus statements. Permissive hypertension is recommended during the first 24-h after stroke onset, yet there is ongoing uncertainty regarding the most appropriate blood BP management in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. This study aims to develop a decision support tool for improving the management of extremely high BP during the first 24 h after acute ischemic stroke by using machine learning (ML) tools.MethodsThis diagnostic accuracy study used retrospective data from MIMIC-III and eICU databases. Decision trees were constructed by a hierarchical binary recursive partitioning algorithm to predict the BP-lowering of 10-30% off the maximal value when antihypertensive treatment was given in patients with an extremely high BP (above 220/110 or 180/105 mmHg for patients receiving thrombolysis), according to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA), the European Society of Cardiology, and the European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) guidelines. Regression trees were used to predict the time-weighted average BP. Implementation of synthetic minority oversampling technique was used to balance the dataset according to different antihypertensive treatments. The model performance of the decision tree was compared to the performance of neural networks, random forest, and logistic regression models.ResultsIn total, 7,265 acute ischemic stroke patients were identified. Diastolic BP (DBP) is the main variable for predicting BP reduction in the first 24 h after a stroke. For patients receiving thrombolysis with DBP <120 mmHg, Labetalol and Amlodipine are effective treatments. Above DBP of 120 mmHg, Amlodipine, Lisinopril, and Nicardipine are the most effective treatments. However, successful treatment depends on avoiding hyponatremia and on kidney functions.ConclusionThis is the first study to address BP management in the acute phase of ischemic stroke using ML techniques. The results indicate that the treatment choice should be adjusted to different clinical and BP parameters, thus, providing a better decision-making approach.

Project description:ImportanceThe effects of moderate systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering after successful recanalization with endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke are uncertain.ObjectiveTo determine the futility of lower SBP targets after endovascular therapy (<140 mm Hg or 160 mm Hg) compared with a higher target (≤180 mm Hg).Design, setting, and participantsRandomized, open-label, blinded end point, phase 2, futility clinical trial that enrolled 120 patients with acute ischemic stroke who had undergone successful endovascular therapy at 3 US comprehensive stroke centers from January 2020 to March 2022 (final follow-up, June 2022).InterventionAfter undergoing endovascular therapy, participants were randomized to 1 of 3 SBP targets: 40 to less than 140 mm Hg, 40 to less than 160 mm Hg, and 40 to 180 mm Hg or less (guideline recommended) group, initiated within 60 minutes of recanalization and maintained for 24 hours.Main outcomes and measuresPrespecified multiple primary outcomes for the primary futility analysis were follow-up infarct volume measured at 36 (±12) hours and utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (range, 0 [worst] to 1 [best]) at 90 (±14) days. Linear regression models were used to test the harm-futility boundaries of a 10-mL increase (slope of 0.5) in the follow-up infarct volume or a 0.10 decrease (slope of -0.005) in the utility-weighted mRS score with each 20-mm Hg SBP target reduction after endovascular therapy (1-sided α = .05). Additional prespecified futility criterion was a less than 25% predicted probability of success for a future 2-group, superiority trial comparing SBP targets of the low- and mid-thresholds with the high-threshold (maximum sample size, 1500 with respect to the utility-weighted mRS score outcome).ResultsAmong 120 patients randomized (mean [SD] age, 69.6 [14.5] years; 69 females [58%]), 113 (94.2%) completed the trial. The mean follow-up infarct volume was 32.4 mL (95% CI, 18.0 to 46.7 mL) for the less than 140-mm Hg group, 50.7 mL (95% CI, 33.7 to 67.7 mL), for the less than 160-mm Hg group, and 46.4 mL (95% CI, 24.5 to 68.2 mL) for the 180-mm Hg or less group. The mean utility-weighted mRS score was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.63) for the less than 140-mm Hg group, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.60) for the less than 160-mm Hg group, and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.71) for the high-target group. The slope of the follow-up infarct volume for each mm Hg decrease in the SBP target, adjusted for the baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score, was -0.29 (95% CI, -0.81 to ∞; futility P = .99). The slope of the utility-weighted mRS score for each mm Hg decrease in the SBP target after endovascular therapy, adjusted for baseline utility-weighted mRS score, was -0.0019 (95% CI, -∞ to 0.0017; futility P = .93). Comparing the high-target SBP group with the lower-target groups, the predicted probability of success for a future trial was 25% for the less than 140-mm Hg group and 14% for the 160-mm Hg group.Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients with acute ischemic stroke, lower SBP targets less than either 140 mm Hg or 160 mm Hg after successful endovascular therapy did not meet prespecified criteria for futility compared with an SBP target of 180 mm Hg or less. However, the findings suggested a low probability of benefit from lower SBP targets after endovascular therapy if tested in a future larger trial.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04116112.

Dataset Information

Unsolved issues in the management of high blood pressure in acute ischemic stroke.

Publications

Unsolved issues in the management of high blood pressure in acute ischemic stroke.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets