Dataset Information

Quantification of the thorax-to-abdomen breathing ratio for breathing motion modeling.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology to quantitatively measure the thorax-to-abdomen breathing ratio from a 4DCT dataset for breathing motion modeling and breathing motion studies.The thorax-to-abdomen breathing ratio was quantified by measuring the rate of cross-sectional volume increase throughout the thorax and abdomen as a function of tidal volume. Twenty-six 16-slice 4DCT patient datasets were acquired during quiet respiration using a protocol that acquired 25 ciné scans at each couch position. Fifteen datasets included data from the neck through the pelvis. Tidal volume, measured using a spirometer and abdominal pneumatic bellows, was used as breathing-cycle surrogates. The cross-sectional volume encompassed by the skin contour when compared for each CT slice against the tidal volume exhibited a nearly linear relationship. A robust iteratively reweighted least squares regression analysis was used to determine η(i), defined as the amount of cross-sectional volume expansion at each slice i per unit tidal volume. The sum Ση(i) throughout all slices was predicted to be the ratio of the geometric expansion of the lung and the tidal volume; 1.11. The Xiphoid process was selected as the boundary between the thorax and abdomen. The Xiphoid process slice was identified in a scan acquired at mid-inhalation. The imaging protocol had not originally been designed for purposes of measuring the thorax-to-abdomen breathing ratio so the scans did not extend to the anatomy with η(i) = 0. Extrapolation of η(i)-η(i) = 0 was used to include the entire breathing volume. The thorax and abdomen regions were individually analyzed to determine the thorax-to-abdomen breathing ratios. There were 11 image datasets that had been scanned only through the thorax. For these cases, the abdomen breathing component was equal to 1.11 - Ση(i) where the sum was taken throughout the thorax.The average Ση(i) for thorax and abdomen image datasets was found to be 1.20 ± 0.17, close to the expected value of 1.11. The thorax-to-abdomen breathing ratio was 0.32 ± 0.24. The average Ση(i) was 0.26 ± 0.14 in the thorax and 0.93 ± 0.22 in the abdomen. In the scan datasets that encompassed only the thorax, the average Ση(i) was 0.21 ± 0.11.A method to quantify the relationship between abdomen and thoracic breathing was developed and characterized.

SUBMITTER: White BM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3669136 | biostudies-other | 2013 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe accuracy of deformable image registration tools can vary widely between imaging modalities and specific implementations of the same algorithms. A biomechanical model-based algorithm initially developed in-house at an academic institution was translated into a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system and validated for multiple imaging modalities and anatomic sites.MethodsBiomechanical deformable registration (Morfeus) is a geometry-driven algorithm based on the finite element method. Boundary conditions are derived from the model-based segmentation of controlling structures in each image which establishes a point-to-point surface correspondence. For each controlling structure, material properties and fixed or sliding interfaces are assigned. The displacements of internal volumes for controlling structures and other structures implicitly deformed are solved with finite element analysis. Registration was performed for 74 patients with images (mean vector resolution) of thoracic and abdominal 4DCT (2.8 mm) and MR (5.3 mm), liver CT-MR (4.5 mm), and prostate MR (2.6 mm). Accuracy was quantified between deformed and actual target images using distance-to-agreement (DTA) for structure surfaces and the target registration error (TRE) for internal point landmarks.ResultsThe results of the commercial implementation were as follows. The mean DTA was ≤ 1.0 mm for controlling structures and 1.0-3.5 mm for implicitly deformed structures on average. TRE ranged from 2.0 mm on prostate MR to 5.1 mm on lung MR on average, within 0.1 mm or lower than the image voxel sizes. Accuracy was not overly sensitive to changes in the material properties or variability in structure segmentations, as changing these inputs affected DTA and TRE by ≤ 0.8 mm. Maximum DTA > 5 mm occurred for 88% of the structures evaluated although these were within the inherent segmentation uncertainty for 82% of structures. Differences in accuracy between the commercial and in-house research implementations were ≤ 0.5 mm for mean DTA and ≤ 0.7 mm for mean TRE.ConclusionsAccuracy of biomechanical deformable registration evaluated on a large cohort of images in the thorax, abdomen and prostate was similar to the image voxel resolution on average across multiple modalities. Validation of this treatment planning system implementation supports biomechanical deformable registration as a versatile clinical tool to enable accurate target delineation at planning and treatment adaptation.

Project description:Objectives3D chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI enables accurate and precise quantification of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2*, biomarkers of hepatic fat and iron deposition. Unfortunately, 3D CSE-MRI requires reliable breath-holding. Free-breathing 2D CSE-MRI with sequential radiofrequency excitation is a motion-robust alternative but suffers from low signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). To overcome this limitation, this work explores the combination of flip angle-modulated (FAM) 2D CSE imaging with a non-local means (NLM) motion-corrected averaging technique.MethodsIn this prospective study, 35 healthy subjects (27 children/8 adults) were imaged on a 3T MRI-system. Multi-echo 3D CSE ("3D") and 2D CSE FAM ("FAM") images were acquired during breath-hold and free-breathing, respectively, to obtain PDFF and R2* maps of the liver. Multi-repetition FAM was postprocessed with direct averaging (DA)- and NLM-based averaging and compared to 3D CSE using Bland-Altmann and regression analysis. Image qualities of PDFF and R2* maps were reviewed by two radiologists using a Likert-like scale (score 1-5, 5 = best).ResultsCompared to 3D CSE, multi-repetition FAM-NLM showed excellent agreement (regression slope = 1.0, R2 = 0.996) for PDFF and good agreement (regression slope 1.08-1.15, R2 ≥ 0.899) for R2*. Further, multi-repetition FAM-NLM PDFF and R2* maps had fewer artifacts (score 3.8 vs. 3.2, p < 0.0001 for PDFF; score 3.2 vs. 2.6, p < 0.001 for R2*) and better overall image quality (score 4.0 vs. 3.5, p < 0.0001 for PDFF; score 3.4 vs. 2.7, p < 0.0001 for R2*).ConclusionsFree-breathing FAM-NLM provides superior image quality of the liver compared to the conventional breath-hold 3D CSE-MRI, while minimizing bias for PDFF and R2* quantification.Key points• 2D CSE FAM-NLM is a free-breathing method for liver fat and iron quantification and viable alternative for patients unable to hold their breath. • 2D CSE FAM-NLM is a feasible alternative to breath-hold 3D CSE methods, with low bias in proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and no clinically significant bias in R2*. • Quantitatively, multiple repetitions in 2D CSE FAM-NLM lead to improved SNR.

Project description:PurposeTo develop a physical, adaptive motion perturbation model to predict tumor motion using feedback from dynamic measurement of breathing conditions to compensate for breathing irregularities.Methods and materialsA novel respiratory motion perturbation (RMP) model was developed to predict tumor motion variations caused by breathing irregularities. This model contained 2 terms: the initial tumor motion trajectory, measured from 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) images, and motion perturbation, calculated from breathing variations in tidal volume (TV) and breathing pattern (BP). The motion perturbation was derived from the patient-specific anatomy, tumor-specific location, and time-dependent breathing variations. Ten patients were studied, and 2 amplitude-binned 4DCT images for each patient were acquired within 2 weeks. The motion trajectories of 40 corresponding bifurcation points in both 4DCT images of each patient were obtained using deformable image registration. An in-house 4D data processing toolbox was developed to calculate the TV and BP as functions of the breathing phase. The motion was predicted from the simulation 4DCT scan to the treatment 4DCT scan, and vice versa, resulting in 800 predictions. For comparison, noncorrected motion differences and the predictions from a published 5-dimensional model were used.ResultsThe average motion range in the superoinferior direction was 9.4 ± 4.4 mm, the average ΔTV ranged from 10 to 248 mm3 (-26% to 61%), and the ΔBP ranged from 0 to 0.2 (-71% to 333%) between the 2 4DCT scans. The mean noncorrected motion difference was 2.0 ± 2.8 mm between 2 4DCT motion trajectories. After applying the RMP model, the mean motion difference was reduced significantly to 1.2 ± 1.8 mm (P=.0018), a 40% improvement, similar to the 1.2 ± 1.8 mm (P=.72) predicted with the 5-dimensional model.ConclusionsA novel physical RMP model was developed with an average accuracy of 1.2 ± 1.8 mm for interfraction motion prediction, similar to that of a published lung motion model. This physical RMP was analytically derived and is able to adapt to breathing irregularities. Further improvement of this RMP model is under investigation.

Dataset Information

Quantification of the thorax-to-abdomen breathing ratio for breathing motion modeling.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets