Progressive cone beam CT dose control in image-guided radiation therapy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yan H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3669143 | biostudies-other | 2013 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundTo develop a low-dose cone beam CT (LD-CBCT) reconstruction method named simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique and dual-dictionary learning (SART-DDL) joint algorithm for image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and evaluate its imaging quality and clinical application ability.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 62 CBCT image sets from February 2018 to July 2018 at west china hospital were randomly collected from 42 head and neck patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 49.7 [11.4] years, 12 females and 30 males). All image sets were retrospectively reconstructed by SART-DDL (resultant D-CBCT image sets) with 18% less clinical raw projections. Reconstruction quality was evaluated by quantitative parameters compared with SART and Total Variation minimization (SART-TV) joint reconstruction algorithm with paired t test. Five-grade subjective grading evaluations were done by two oncologists in a blind manner compared with clinically used Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm CBCT images (resultant F-CBCT image sets) and the grading results were compared by paired Wilcoxon rank test. Registration results between D-CBCT and F-CBCT were compared. D-CBCT image geometry fidelity was tested.ResultsThe mean peak signal to noise ratio of D-CBCT was 1.7 dB higher than SART-TV reconstructions (P < .001, SART-DDL vs SART-TV, 36.36 ± 0.55 dB vs 34.68 ± 0.28 dB). All D-CBCT images were recognized as clinically acceptable without significant difference with F-CBCT in subjective grading (P > .05). In clinical registration, the maximum translational and rotational difference was 1.8 mm and 1.7 degree respectively. The horizontal, vertical and sagittal geometry fidelity of D-CBCT were acceptable.ConclusionsThe image quality, geometry fidelity and clinical application ability of D-CBCT are comparable to that of the F-CBCT for head-and-neck patients with 18% less projections by SART-DDL.
| S-EPMC7425566 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography protocols for image-guided radiotherapy may permit target localization while minimizing radiation exposure. We prospectively evaluated a lower-dose cone-beam protocol for central nervous system image-guided radiotherapy across a multinational pediatrics consortium. METHODS:Seven institutions prospectively employed a lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography central nervous system protocol (weighted average dose 0.7 mGy) for patients ?21 years. Treatment table shifts between setup with surface lasers versus cone-beam computed tomography were used to approximate setup accuracy, and vector magnitudes for these shifts were calculated. Setup group mean, interpatient, interinstitution, and random error were estimated, and clinical factors were compared by mixed linear modeling. RESULTS:Among 96 patients, with 2179 pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography acquisitions, median age was 9 years (1-20). Setup parameters were 3.13, 3.02, 1.64, and 1.48 mm for vector magnitude group mean, interpatient, interinstitution, and random error, respectively. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant differences in mean vector magnitude by age, gender, performance status, target location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, or steroid or anesthesia use. Providers rated >99% of images as adequate or better for target localization. CONCLUSIONS:A lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography protocol demonstrated table shift vector magnitude that approximate clinical target volume/planning target volume expansions used in central nervous system radiotherapy. There were no significant clinical predictors of setup accuracy identified, supporting use of this lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography protocol across a diverse pediatric population with brain tumors.
| S-EPMC7225835 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This paper reports on the commissioning of an Elekta cone-beam computed tomography (CT) system at one of the first U.S. sites to install a "regular," off-the-shelf Elekta Synergy (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) accelerator system. We present the quality assurance (QA) procedure as a guide for other users. The commissioning had six elements: (1) system safety, (2) geometric accuracy (agreement of megavoltage and kilovoltage beam isocenters), (3) image quality, (4) registration and correction accuracy, (5) dose to patient and dosimetric stability, and (6) QA procedures. The system passed the safety tests, and agreement of the isocenters was found to be within 1 mm. Using a precisely moved skull phantom, the reconstruction and alignment algorithm was found to be accurate within 1 mm and 1 degree in each dimension. Of 12 measurement points spanning a 9x9x15-cm volume in a Rando phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY), the average agreement in the x, y, and z coordinates was 0.10 mm, -0.12 mm, and 0.22 mm [standard deviations (SDs): 0.21 mm, 0.55 mm, 0.21 mm; largest deviations: 0.6 mm, 1.0 mm, 0.5 mm] respectively. The larger deviation for the y component can be partly attributed to the CT slice thickness of 1 mm in that direction. Dose to the patient depends on the machine settings and patient geometry. To monitor dose consistency, air kerma (output) and half-value layer (beam quality) are measured for a typical clinical setting. Air kerma was 6.3 cGy (120 kVp, 40 mA, 40 ms per frame, 360-degree scan, S20 field of view); half value layer was 7.1 mm aluminum (120 kV, 40 mA). We suggest performing items 1, 2, and 3 monthly, and 4 and 5 annually. In addition, we devised a daily QA procedure to verify agreement of the megavoltage and kilovoltage isocenters using a simple phantom containing three small steel balls. The frequency of all checks will be reevaluated based on data collected during about 1 year.
| S-EPMC5722599 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo compare cone-beam computed tomography (CT) navigation vs conventional CT image guidance during biopsies.Materials and methodsPatients scheduled for image-guided biopsies were prospectively and randomly assigned to conventional CT guidance vs cone-beam CT navigation. Radiation dose, accuracy of final needle position, rate of histopathologic diagnosis, and number of needle repositions to reach the target (defined as pullback to adjust position) were compared.ResultsA total of 58 patients (mean age, 57 y; 62.1% men) were randomized: 29 patients underwent 33 biopsies with CT guidance and 29 patients with 33 lesions underwent biopsy with cone-beam CT navigation. The average body mass index (BMI) was similar between groups, at 28.8 kg/m(2) ± 6.55 (P = .18). There was no difference between groups in terms of patient and lesion characteristics (eg, size, depth). The average lesion size was 29.1 ± 12.7mm for CT group vs 32.1mm ±16.8mm for cone-beam CT group (P < 0.59). Location of lesions was equally divided between the 2 groups, 20 lung lesions, 18 renal lesions and 20 other abdominal lesions. Mean number of needle repositions in the cone-beam CT group was 0.3 ± 0.5, compared with 1.9 ± 2.3 with conventional CT (P < .001). The average skin entry dose was 29% lower with cone-beam CT than with conventional CT (P < .04 accounting for BMI). The average estimated effective dose for the planning scan from phantom data was 49% lower with cone-beam CT vs conventional CT (P = .018). Accuracy, defined as the difference between planned and final needle positions, was 4.9 mm ± 4.1 for the cone-beam CT group, compared with 12.2 mm ± 8.1 for conventional CT (P < .001). Histopathologic diagnosis rates were similar between groups, at 90.9% for conventional CT and 93.9% for cone-beam CT (P = .67).ConclusionsCone-beam CT navigation for biopsies improved targeting accuracy with fewer needle repositions, lower skin entry dose, and lower effective dose for planning scan, and a comparable histopathologic diagnosis rate.
| S-EPMC7869923 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe endobronchial diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions suspected of lung cancer remains a challenge from a navigation as well as an adequate tissue sampling perspective. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guidance is a relatively new technology and allows for 3-dimensional imaging confirmation as well as navigation and biopsy guidance, but, also involves radiation. This study investigates how radiation exposure and diagnostic accuracy in the CBCT-guided navigation bronchoscopy evolves with increasing experience, and, with a specific tailoring of CBCT and fluoroscopic imaging protocols towards the procedure.Patients and methodsIn this observational clinical trial, all 238 consecutive patients undergoing a CBCT-guided navigation bronchoscopy from the start of our CBCT-guided navigation bronchoscopy program (December 2017) until June 2020 were included. Procedural dose characteristics and diagnostic accuracy are reported as a function of time.ResultsProcedural radiation exposure as measured by the dose area product initially was 47.5 Gy·cm2 (effective dose: 14.3 mSv) and gradually reduced to 25.4 Gy·cm2 (5.8 mSv). The reduction in fluoroscopic dose area product was highest, from 19.0 Gy·cm2 (5.2 mSv) to 2.2 Gy·cm2 (0.37 mSv, 88% reduction), despite a significant increase of fluoroscopy time. The diagnostic accuracy of navigation bronchoscopy increased from 72% to 90%.ConclusionA significant learning effect can be seen in the radiation safety and diagnostic accuracy of a CBCT-guided and augmented fluoroscopy-guided navigation bronchoscopy. With increasing experience and tailoring of imaging protocols to the procedure, the procedural accuracy improved, while the effective dose for patients and staff was reduced.
| S-EPMC8460082 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo describe in detail a dataset consisting of serial four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and 4D cone beam CT (4DCBCT) images acquired during chemoradiotherapy of 20 locally advanced, nonsmall cell lung cancer patients we have collected at our institution and shared publicly with the research community.Acquisition and validation methodsAs part of an NCI-sponsored research study 82 4DCT and 507 4DCBCT images were acquired in a population of 20 locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. All subjects underwent concurrent radiochemotherapy to a total dose of 59.4-70.2 Gy using daily 1.8 or 2 Gy fractions. Audio-visual biofeedback was used to minimize breathing irregularity during all fractions, including acquisition of all 4DCT and 4DCBCT acquisitions in all subjects. Target, organs at risk, and implanted fiducial markers were delineated by a physician in the 4DCT images. Image coordinate system origins between 4DCT and 4DCBCT were manipulated in such a way that the images can be used to simulate initial patient setup in the treatment position. 4DCT images were acquired on a 16-slice helical CT simulator with 10 breathing phases and 3 mm slice thickness during simulation. In 13 of the 20 subjects, 4DCTs were also acquired on the same scanner weekly during therapy. Every day, 4DCBCT images were acquired on a commercial onboard CBCT scanner. An optically tracked external surrogate was synchronized with CBCT acquisition so that each CBCT projection was time stamped with the surrogate respiratory signal through in-house software and hardware tools. Approximately 2500 projections were acquired over a period of 8-10 minutes in half-fan mode with the half bow-tie filter. Using the external surrogate, the CBCT projections were sorted into 10 breathing phases and reconstructed with an in-house FDK reconstruction algorithm. Errors in respiration sorting, reconstruction, and acquisition were carefully identified and corrected.Data format and usage notes4DCT and 4DCBCT images are available in DICOM format and structures through DICOM-RT RTSTRUCT format. All data are stored in the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA, http://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/) as collection 4D-Lung and are publicly available.DiscussionDue to high temporal frequency sampling, redundant (4DCT and 4DCBCT) data at similar timepoints, oversampled 4DCBCT, and fiducial markers, this dataset can support studies in image-guided and image-guided adaptive radiotherapy, assessment of 4D voxel trajectory variability, and development and validation of new tools for image registration and motion management.
| S-EPMC5912888 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe imaging dose of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) poses adverse effects on patient health. To improve the quality of sparse-view low-dose CBCT images, a projection synthesis convolutional neural network (SynCNN) model is proposed.MethodsIncluded in this retrospective, single-center study were 223 patients diagnosed with brain tumours from Beijing Cancer Hospital. The proposed SynCNN model estimated two pairs of orthogonally direction-separable spatial kernels to synthesize the missing projection in between the input neighboring sparse-view projections via local convolution operations. The SynCNN model was trained on 150 real patients to learn patterns for inter-view projection synthesis. CBCT data from 30 real patients were used to validate the SynCNN, while data from a phantom and 43 real patients were used to test the SynCNN externally. Sparse-view projection datasets with 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 of the original sampling rate were simulated, and the corresponding full-view projection datasets were restored using the SynCNN model. The tomographic images were then reconstructed with the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm. The root-mean-square error (RMSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity (SSIM) metrics were measured in both the projection and image domains. Five experts were invited to grade the image quality blindly for 40 randomly selected evaluation groups with a four-level rubric, where a score greater than or equal to 2 was considered acceptable image quality. The running time of the SynCNN model was recorded. The SynCNN model was directly compared with the three other methods on 1/4 sparse-view reconstructions.ResultsThe phantom and patient studies showed that the missing projections were accurately synthesized. In the image domain, for the phantom study, compared with images reconstructed from sparse-view projections, images with SynCNN synthesis exhibited significantly improved qualities with decreased values in RMSE and increased values in PSNR and SSIM. For the patient study, between the results with and without the SynCNN synthesis, the averaged RMSE decreased by 3.4×10-4, 10.3×10-4, and 21.7×10-4, the averaged PSNR increased by 3.4, 6.6, and 9.4 dB, and the averaged SSIM increased by 5.2×10-2, 18.9×10-2 and 33.9×10-2, for the 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 sparse-view reconstructions, respectively. In expert subjective evaluation, both the median scores and acceptance rates of the images with SynCNN synthesis were higher than those reconstructed from sparse-view projections. It took the model less than 0.01 s to synthesize an inter-view projection. Compared with the three other methods, the SynCNN model obtained the best scores in terms of the three metrics in both domains.ConclusionsThe proposed SynCNN model effectively improves the quality of sparse-view CBCT images at a low time cost. With the SynCNN model, the CBCT imaging dose in IGRT could be reduced potentially.
| S-EPMC10784032 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We describe a dataset from patients who received ablative radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), consisting of computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) images with physician-drawn organ-at-risk (OAR) contours. The image datasets (one CT for treatment planning and two CBCT scans at the time of treatment per patient) were collected from 40 patients. All scans were acquired with the patient in the treatment position and in a deep inspiration breath-hold state. Six radiation oncologists delineated the gastrointestinal OARs consisting of small bowel, stomach and duodenum, such that the same physician delineated all image sets belonging to the same patient. Two trained medical physicists further edited the contours to ensure adherence to delineation guidelines. The image and contour files are available in DICOM format and are publicly available from The Cancer Imaging Archive ( https://doi.org/10.7937/TCIA.ESHQ-4D90 , Version 2). The dataset can serve as a criterion standard for evaluating the accuracy and reliability of deformable image registration and auto-segmentation algorithms, as well as a training set for deep-learning-based methods.
| S-EPMC9587208 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A flat-panel detector based mobile isocentric C-arm for cone-beam CT (CBCT) has been developed to allow intraoperative 3D imaging with sub-millimeter spatial resolution and soft-tissue visibility. Image quality and radiation dose were evaluated in spinal surgery, commonly relying on lower-performance image intensifier based mobile C-arms. Scan protocols were developed for task-specific imaging at minimum dose, in-room exposure was evaluated, and integration of the imaging system with a surgical guidance system was demonstrated in preclinical studies of minimally invasive spine surgery.Radiation dose was assessed as a function of kilovolt (peak) (80-120 kVp) and milliampere second using thoracic and lumbar spine dosimetry phantoms. In-room radiation exposure was measured throughout the operating room for various CBCT scan protocols. Image quality was assessed using tissue-equivalent inserts in chest and abdomen phantoms to evaluate bone and soft-tissue contrast-to-noise ratio as a function of dose, and task-specific protocols (i.e., visualization of bone or soft-tissues) were defined. Results were applied in preclinical studies using a cadaveric torso simulating minimally invasive, transpedicular surgery.Task-specific CBCT protocols identified include: thoracic bone visualization (100 kVp; 60 mAs; 1.8 mGy); lumbar bone visualization (100 kVp; 130 mAs; 3.2 mGy); thoracic soft-tissue visualization (100 kVp; 230 mAs; 4.3 mGy); and lumbar soft-tissue visualization (120 kVp; 460 mAs; 10.6 mGy)--each at (0.3 x 0.3 x 0.9 mm3) voxel size. Alternative lower-dose, lower-resolution soft-tissue visualization protocols were identified (100 kVp; 230 mAs; 5.1 mGy) for the lumbar region at (0.3 x 0.3 x 1.5 mm3) voxel size. Half-scan orbit of the C-arm (x-ray tube traversing under the table) was dosimetrically advantageous (prepatient attenuation) with a nonuniform dose distribution (-2 x higher at the entrance side than at isocenter, and -3-4 lower at the exit side). The in-room dose (microsievert) per unit scan dose (milligray) ranged from -21 microSv/mGy on average at tableside to -0.1 microSv/mGy at 2.0 m distance to isocenter. All protocols involve surgical staff stepping behind a shield wall for each CBCT scan, therefore imparting -zero dose to staff. Protocol implementation in preclinical cadaveric studies demonstrate integration of the C-arm with a navigation system for spine surgery guidance-specifically, minimally invasive vertebroplasty in which the system provided accurate guidance and visualization of needle placement and bone cement distribution. Cumulative dose including multiple intraoperative scans was -11.5 mGy for CBCT-guided thoracic vertebroplasty and -23.2 mGy for lumbar vertebroplasty, with dose to staff at tableside reduced to -1 min of fluoroscopy time (-4(0-60 microSv), compared to 5-11 min for the conventional approach.Intraoperative CBCT using a high-performance mobile C-arm prototype demonstrates image quality suitable to guidance of spine surgery, with task-specific protocols providing an important basis for minimizing radiation dose, while maintaining image quality sufficient for surgical guidance. Images demonstrate a significant advance in spatial resolution and soft-tissue visibility, and CBCT guidance offers the potential to reduce fluoroscopy reliance, reducing cumulative dose to patient and staff. Integration with a surgical guidance system demonstrates precise tracking and visualization in up-to-date images (alleviating reliance on preoperative images only), including detection of errors or suboptimal surgical outcomes in the operating room.
| S-EPMC3161502 | biostudies-other
Project description:Background and purposeThe limited image quality in Cone Beam CT (CBCT) stemming primarily from scattered radiation hinders accurate CBCT based dose calculation in radiotherapy. We investigated the use of a stoichiometric calibration for dose calculation on CBCT images of lung cancer patients.Materials and methodsCBCT calibrations were performed with thorax scan protocols, using a phantom with approximately the diameter of an average human thorax and a central cavity simulating the thoracic cavity. Thus scatter conditions resembling those in clinical thorax CBCT scans were simulated. A published stoichiometric parametrization was used. A treatment plan was simulated on CBCT and CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom, the dose distributions were calculated, and clinically relevant DVH parameters were compared. Twelve lung cancer patients had surveillance CT scans (s-CT) taken twice during their treatment course in addition to daily setup CBCTs. Dose calculations were performed on the s-CTs and the corresponding CBCTs taken on the same day, and DVH parameters were compared.ResultsEighty percent of CBCT DVH parameters found for the phantom were within ±1% of CT doses, and 98% were within ±3%. For patients, the median CT/CBCT dose difference was within ±2%, and 98% of DVH parameters were within ±4%. Minimum dose to the tumor was underestimated (median 1.9%) on CBCT, while maximum doses to most organs at risk were slightly overestimated.ConclusionDirect dose calculations on CBCTs of lung cancer patients were feasible within ∼4% accuracy using a simple calibration method, which is easily implemented in a clinical setting.
| S-EPMC7807659 | biostudies-literature