Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Al-Okshi A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3699970 | biostudies-other | 2013
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:OBJECTIVES: To examine the presence and morphologic characteristics of bifid mandibular canals (BMCs) and retromolar foramens (RFs) using cone beam CT (CBCT) and to determine their visualization on panoramic radiographs (PANs). METHODS: A sample of 225 CBCT examinations was analysed for the presence of BMCs, as well as length, height, diameter and angle. The diameter of the RF was also determined. Subsequently, corresponding PANs were analysed to determine whether the BMCs and RFs were visible or not. RESULTS: The BMCs were observed on CBCT in 83 out of the 225 patients (36.8%). With respect to gender, statistically significant differences were found in the number of BMCs. There were also significant differences in anatomical characteristics of the types of BMCs. Only 37.8% of the BMCs and 32.5% of the RFs identified on CBCT were also visible on PANs. The diameter had a significant effect on the capability of PANs to visualize BMCs and RFs (B = 0.791, p = 0.035; B = 1.900, p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PANs are unable to sufficiently identify BMCs and RFs. The diameter of these anatomical landmarks represents a relevant factor for visualization on PANs. Pre-operative images using only PANs may lead to underestimation of the presence of BMCs and to surgical complications and anaesthetic failures, which could have been avoided. For true determination of BMCs, a CBCT device should be considered better than a PAN.
| S-EPMC4082272 | biostudies-other
Project description:OBJECTIVES: Evaluation and reduction of dose are important issues. Since cone beam CT (CBCT) has been established now not just in dentistry, the number of acquired examinations continues to rise. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to compare the doses of available devices on the market owing to different exposition parameters, volumes and geometries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the spans of effective doses (EDs) of ten different CBCT devices. METHODS: 48 thermoluminescent dosemeters were placed in 24 sites in a RANDO(®) head phantom. Protocols with lowest exposition parameters and protocols with highest exposition parameters were performed for each of the ten devices. The ED was calculated from the measured energy doses according to the International Commission on Radiological Protection 2007 recommendations for each protocol and device, and the statistical values were evaluated afterwards. RESULTS: The calculation of the ED resulted in values between 17.2 µSv and 396 µSv for the ten devices. The mean values for protocols with lowest and highest exposition parameters were 31.6 µSv and 209 µSv, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It was not the aim of this study to evaluate the image quality depending on different exposition parameters but to define the spans of EDs in which different CBCT devices work. There is a wide span of ED for different CBCT devices depending on the selected exposition parameters, required spatial resolution and many other factors.
| S-EPMC3699973 | biostudies-other
Project description:OBJECTIVES: In the 2011 project "Safety and efficacy of a new and emerging dental X-ray modality (SEDENTEXCT)", it was suggested that dose index (DI) and dose-area product (DAP) could be easily measured and used as diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), which would help in the management of radiation doses to patients in optimum exposure settings. Such indices could be directly related to effective dose. The purposes of this study, therefore, were to measure and calculate the DI and DAP in cone beam CT (CBCT) machines and to evaluate the correlation between the two. METHODS: Dose measurements were performed on three-dimensional cone beam CT (3D-CBCT) machines [3D Accuitomo (J. Morita Mfg. Corp., Kyoto, Japan), Veraviewepocs (J. Morita Mfg. Corp.) and CS9300 (Carestream, New York, NY)] by exposing a cylindrical poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom using a CT ionization chamber. These dose measurements were used for the calculation of Dose Indices 1 and 2, according to the methodology suggested by SEDENTEXCT. The DAP was measured using a DAP meter that was attached to the detector to cover the entire irradiated area. RESULTS: The DI1 ranged from 53.6 mR to 216.6 mR, the DI2 ranged from 77.1 mR to 325.0 mR and the DAP ranged from 101.1 mGy cm(2) to 457.9 mGy cm(2), depending on the machines and exposure settings. Index 2 had a better correlation with the DAP than Index 1. CONCLUSIONS: The DIs and DAP proposed by SEDENTEXCT may be useful for establishing DRLs for dental CBCT machines; however, further studies are necessary to determine which of these indices provide accurate dose estimates proportionally relating to the effective dose.
| S-EPMC3635780 | biostudies-other
Project description:OBJECTIVES: This study compares the effective dose for different fields of view (FOVs), resolutions and X-ray parameters from two cone beam CT units: the KaVo 3D (three-dimensional) eXam and the KaVo Pan eXam Plus 3D (KaVo Dental, Biberach, Germany). METHODS: Measurements were made using thermoluminescent dosemeter chips in a radiation analog dosimetry head and neck phantom. The calculations of effective doses are based on the ICRP 60 and ICRP 103 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. RESULTS: Effective doses from the 3D eXam ranged between 32.8 µSv and 169.8 µSv, and for the Pan eXam Plus effective doses ranged between 40.2 µSv and 183.7 µSv; these were measured using ICRP 103 weighting factors in each case. The increase in effective dose between ICRP 60 and ICRP 103 recommendations averaged 157% for all measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Effective doses can be reduced significantly with the choice of lower resolutions and mAs settings as well as smaller FOVs to avoid tissues sensitive to radiation being inside the direct beam. Larger FOVs do not necessarily lead to higher effective doses.
| S-EPMC3635778 | biostudies-other
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8168718 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo apply the ROBIS tool for assessment of risk of bias (RoB) in systematic reviews (SRs) in a meta-review on effective doses (EDs) in dental and maxillofacial cone beam CT.MethodsThree electronic databases and reference lists of included SRs were searched. Eligible SRs were classified as having low, high or unclear RoB. Findings of SRs were synthesised and data from primary studies combined to relate ED to field of view (FOV) and operating potential (kV).ResultsSeven SRs were included: three displayed low RoB, three high and one had unclear RoB. Only one SR related ED to image quality. Deficiencies in reporting of eligibility criteria, study selection and synthesis of results in SRs were identified. FOV height had a significant relationship with ED, explaining 27.2% of its variability. Median ED for three FOV categories differed significantly. Operating potential had a weak relationship with ED, with no significant difference in median ED between three operating potential groups.ConclusionThe ROBIS tool should have a role for meta-reviews of different aspects of radiology. The disappointing results for RoB might be remedied by developing standards to improve the quality of reporting of primary dosimetry studies and of SRs. Future dosimetry studies should always relate ED to image quality or diagnostic accuracy.Advances in knowledgeThis meta-review is the first to implement ROBIS for SRs of ED and identified that trustworthiness of some SRs is questionable. The percentage change in average ED per cm increase in FOV height could be calculated, emphasizing the importance of FOV as a determinant of ED in CBCT.
| S-EPMC8248222 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Panoramic dental radiography is one of the most used images of the different dental specialties. This radiography provides information about the anatomical structures of the teeth. The correct evaluation of these radiographs is associated with a good quality of the image obtained. In this study, 598 patients were consecutively selected to undergo dental panoramic radiography at the Department of Radiology of the Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción. Contrast enhancement techniques are used to enhance the visual quality of panoramic dental radiographs. Specifically, this article presents a new algorithm for contrast, detail and edge enhancement of panoramic dental radiographs. The proposed algorithm is called Multi-Scale Top-Hat transform powered by Geodesic Reconstruction for panoramic dental radiography enhancement (MSTHGR). This algorithm is based on multi-scale mathematical morphology techniques. The proposal extracts multiple features of brightness and darkness, through the reconstruction of the marker (obtained by the Top-Hat transformation by reconstruction) starting from the mask (obtained by the classic Top-Hat transformation). The maximum characteristics of brightness and darkness are added to the dental panoramic radiography. In this way, the contrast, details and edges of the panoramic radiographs of teeth are improved. For the tests, MSTHGR was compared with the following algorithms: Geodesic Reconstruction Multiscale Morphology Contrast Enhancement (GRMMCE), Histogram Equalization (HE), Brightness Preserving Bi-Histogram Equalization (BBHE), Dual Sub-Image Histogram Equalization (DSIHE), Minimum Mean Brightness Error Bi-Histogram Equalization (MMBEBHE), Quadri-Histogram Equalization with Limited Contrast (QHELC), Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) and Gamma Correction (GC). Experimentally, the numerical results show that the MSTHGR obtained the best results with respect to the Contrast Improvement Ratio (CIR), Entropy (E) and Spatial Frequency (SF) metrics. This indicates that the algorithm performs better local enhancements on panoramic radiographs, improving their details and edges.
| S-EPMC8124639 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeThe limited image quality in Cone Beam CT (CBCT) stemming primarily from scattered radiation hinders accurate CBCT based dose calculation in radiotherapy. We investigated the use of a stoichiometric calibration for dose calculation on CBCT images of lung cancer patients.Materials and methodsCBCT calibrations were performed with thorax scan protocols, using a phantom with approximately the diameter of an average human thorax and a central cavity simulating the thoracic cavity. Thus scatter conditions resembling those in clinical thorax CBCT scans were simulated. A published stoichiometric parametrization was used. A treatment plan was simulated on CBCT and CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom, the dose distributions were calculated, and clinically relevant DVH parameters were compared. Twelve lung cancer patients had surveillance CT scans (s-CT) taken twice during their treatment course in addition to daily setup CBCTs. Dose calculations were performed on the s-CTs and the corresponding CBCTs taken on the same day, and DVH parameters were compared.ResultsEighty percent of CBCT DVH parameters found for the phantom were within ±1% of CT doses, and 98% were within ±3%. For patients, the median CT/CBCT dose difference was within ±2%, and 98% of DVH parameters were within ±4%. Minimum dose to the tumor was underestimated (median 1.9%) on CBCT, while maximum doses to most organs at risk were slightly overestimated.ConclusionDirect dose calculations on CBCTs of lung cancer patients were feasible within ∼4% accuracy using a simple calibration method, which is easily implemented in a clinical setting.
| S-EPMC7807659 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVES::To determine the optimized kV setting for a narrow detector cone-beam CT (CBCT) unit. METHODS::Clinical (CL) and quantitative (QUANT) evaluations of image quality were performed using an anthropomorphic phantom. Technical (TECH) evaluation was performed with a polymethyl methacrylate phantom. Images were obtained using a PaX-i3D Green CBCT (Vatech, Hwaseong, Korea) device, with a large 21 × 19?and a medium 12 × 9?cm field of view (FOV), and high-dose (HD-ranging from 85 to 110 kV) and low-dose (LD-ranging from 75 to 95 kV) protocols, totaling four groups (21 × 19?cm HD, 21 × 19?cm LD, 12 × 9?cm HD, 12 × 9?cm LD). The radiation dose within each group was fixed by adapting the mA according to a predetermined dose-area product. For CL evaluation, three observers assessed images based on overall quality, sharpness, contrast, artefacts, and noise. For QUANT evaluation, mean gray value shift, % increase of standard deviation (SD), % of beam hardening and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. For TECH evaluation, segmentation accuracy, CNR, metal artefact SD, metal object area, and sharpness were measured. Representative parameters were chosen for CL, QUANT, and TECH evaluations to determine the optimal kV based on biplot graphs. kV values of the same protocol were compared by the bootstrapping approach. The ones that had statistical differences with the best kV were considered as worse quality. RESULTS::Overall, kV values within the same group showed similar quality (p > 0.05), except for 110 kV in 21 × 19?cm HD and 85 kV in 12 × 9?cm HD of CL score; also 85, 90 kV in 21 × 19?cm HD and 75, 80 kV in 21 × 19?cm LD of QUANT score which were worse (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION::At a constant dose, low and high kV protocols yield acceptable image quality for a narrow-detector CBCT unit.
| S-EPMC6476352 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to identify variables that can be used for osteoporosis detection using strut analysis, fractal dimension (FD) and the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) using multiple regions of interest and to develop an osteoporosis detection model based on panoramic radiography. METHODS:A total of 454 panoramic radiographs from oral examinations in our dental hospital from 2012 to 2015 were randomly selected, equally distributed among osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients (n = 227 in each group). The radiographs were classified by bone mineral density (T-score). After 3 marrow regions and the endosteal margin area were selected, strut features, FD and GLCM were analysed using a customized image processing program. Image upsampling was used to obtain the optimal binarization for calculating strut features and FD. The independent-samples t-test was used to assess statistical differences between the 2 groups. A decision tree and support vector machine were used to create and verify an osteoporosis detection model. RESULTS:The endosteal margin area showed statistically significant differences in FD, GLCM and strut variables between the osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients, whereas the medullary portions showed few distinguishing features. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the strut variables in the endosteal margin area were 97.1%, 95.7 and 96.25 using the decision tree and 97.2%, 97.1 and 96.9% using support vector machine, and these were the best results obtained among the 3 methods. Strut variables with FD and/or GLCM did not increase the diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION:The analysis of strut features in the endosteal margin area showed potential for the development of an osteoporosis detection model based on panoramic radiography.
| S-EPMC5988182 | biostudies-literature