Dataset Information

Contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity risk assessment in adult inpatients: a comparison of serum creatinine level- and estimated glomerular filtration rate-based screening methods.

ABSTRACT: To compare serum creatinine (SCr) level- and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-based screening methods for identifying adult inpatients at risk for contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN).Institutional review board approval was obtained; informed consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Computed tomographic examinations performed during 10 years in adult inpatients with stable renal function were identified (n = 28 390). The proportion of inpatients meeting various eGFR (≥60, <60, <45, <30, 30-44, 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and SCr (<1.5, ≥1.5, ≥1.6, ≥1.7, ≥1.8, ≥1.9, ≥2.0 mg/dL) thresholds were contrasted with each other and with published guidelines (≥2.0 mg/dL [SCr] and <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) [eGFR]) using McNemar and binomial tests.Most inpatients were considered low risk for CIN with commonly used thresholds: 92.6% (26 285 of 28 390) had SCr <1.5 mg/dL; 91.3% (25 922 of 28 390) had eGFR of ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Using SCr threshold of ≥1.5 mg/dL, identified inpatients had the following eGFRs: 19.6% (413 of 2105), 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 51.1% (1075 of 2105), 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 28.6% (603 of 2105), <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2); and 0.7% (14 of 2105), ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . Using SCr threshold of ≥2.0 mg/dL, identified inpatients had the following eGFRs: 100% (658 of 658), <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 74.6% (491 of 658), <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Threshold of SCr ≥2.0 mg/dL could not be used to identify eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in 0.4% (112 of 28 390) and <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in 6.4% (1810 of 28 390) of all inpatients. Using eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) instead of SCr of ≥1.5 mg/dL would result in a significant but small increase in identified inpatients (8.7% [2468 of 28 390; 95% confidence interval: 8.4%, 9.0%] vs 7.4% [2105 of 28 390; 95% confidence interval: 7.1%, 7.7%]; P < .0001).Screening using eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) instead of common SCr thresholds would significantly increase the number of inpatients identified to be at risk for CIN but would reduce misidentification of a large number of inpatients at low risk according to eGFR criteria.

SUBMITTER: Davenport MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3781354 | biostudies-other | 2013 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline recommends use of a cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to confirm creatinine-based eGFR between 45 and 59 mL · min(-1) · (1.73 m(2))(-1). Prior studies have demonstrated that comorbidities such as solid-organ transplant strongly influence the relationship between measured GFR, creatinine, and cystatin C. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of cystatin C-based eGFR equations compared with creatinine-based eGFR and measured GFR across different clinical presentations. METHODS:We compared the performance of the CKD-EPI 2009 creatinine-based estimated GFR equation (eGFRCr) and the newer CKD-EPI 2012 cystatin C-based equations (eGFRCys and eGFRCr-Cys) with measured GFR (iothalamate renal clearance) across defined patient populations. Patients (n = 1652) were categorized as transplant recipients (n = 568 kidney; n = 319 other organ), known chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients (n = 618), or potential kidney donors (n = 147). RESULTS:eGFRCr-Cys showed the most consistent performance across different clinical populations. Among potential kidney donors without CKD [stage 2 or higher; eGFR >60 mL · min(-1) · (1.73 m(2))(-1)], eGFRCys and eGFRCr-Cys demonstrated significantly less bias than eGFRCr; however, all 3 equations substantially underestimated GFR when eGFR was <60 mL · min(-1) · (1.73 m(2))(-1). Among transplant recipients with CKD stage 3B or greater [eGFR <45 mL · min(-1) · (1.73 m(2))(-1)], eGFRCys was significantly more biased than eGFRCr. No clear differences in eGFR bias between equations were observed among known CKD patients regardless of eGFR range or in any patient group with a GFR between 45 and 59 mL · min(-1) · (1.73 m(2))(-1). CONCLUSIONS:The performance of eGFR equations depends on patient characteristics that are readily apparent on presentation. Among the 3 CKD-EPI equations, eGFRCr-Cys performed most consistently across the studied patient populations.

Project description:Accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important for diagnosis and risk stratification in chronic kidney disease and for selection of living donors. Ethnic differences have required correction factors in the originally developed creatinine-based GFR estimation equations for populations around the world. Existing equations have not been validated in the vegetarian Indian population. We examined the performance of creatinine and cystatin-based GFR estimating equations in Indians.GFR was measured by urinary clearance of inulin. Serum creatinine was measured using IDMS-traceable Jaffe's and enzymatic assays, and cystatin C by colloidal gold immunoassay. Dietary protein intake was calculated by measuring urinary nitrogen appearance. Bias, precision and accuracy were calculated for the eGFR equations.A total of 130 participants (63 healthy kidney donors and 67 with CKD) were studied. About 50% were vegetarians, and the remainder ate meat 3.8 times every month. The average creatinine excretion were 14.7 mg/kg/day (95% CI: 13.5 to 15.9 mg/kg/day) and 12.4 mg/kg/day (95% CI: 11.2 to 13.6 mg/kg/day) in males and females, respectively. The average daily protein intake was 46.1 g/day (95% CI: 43.2 to 48.8 g/day). The mean mGFR in the study population was 51.66?±?31.68 ml/min/1.73m2. All creatinine-based eGFR equations overestimated GFR (p?<?0.01 for each creatinine based eGFR equation). However, eGFR by CKD-EPICys was not significantly different from mGFR (p?=?0.38). The CKD-EPICys exhibited lowest bias [mean bias: -3.53?±?14.70 ml/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: -0.608 to -0.98)] and highest accuracy (P30: 74.6%). The GFR in the healthy population was 79.44 ± 20.19 (range: 41.90-134.50) ml/min/1.73m2.Existing creatinine-based GFR estimating equations overestimate GFR in Indians. An appropriately powered study is needed to develop either a correction factor or a new equation for accurate assessment of kidney function in the Indian population.

Project description:Background and objectivesThe tracing of creatinine (Cr) reference materials to isotope dilution mass spectrometry-assigned values was implemented worldwide to reduce interlaboratory variability and improve assay accuracy. The aims of this study were to examine the current extent of interlaboratory variability and its effect on eGFR.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsLeftover plasma from 2-3 consecutive days was obtained from 53 intensive care unit patients with a range of kidney functions. Individual patient samples were pooled and split and sent to 12 different laboratories for Cr measurement. For each patient, the mean Cr and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration eGFR (eGFR-EPI), assuming a 65-year-old nonblack woman, were determined. Interlaboratory variability was assessed by the range and SD of Cr and eGFR-EPI. This was repeated after stratifying by assay type and by the median Cr of 1.36 mg/dl. For patients whose eGFR-EPI range included 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, the percentage of laboratories with eGFR-EPI<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was determined.ResultsThe mean±SD of the Cr and eGFR-EPI ranges were 0.20±0.09 mg/dl and 14±9 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for Cr<1.36 mg/dl. Jaffe Cr results were an average 0.1 mg/dl (Cr?1.36 mg/dl) and 0.05 mg/dl (Cr<1.36 mg/dl) higher than enzymatic results (P<0.001 for both). Ten patients had an eGFR-EPI range that included 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Their median eGFR-EPI range was 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2. There was significant discordance in the diagnosis of CKD (eGFR-EPI<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2), with laboratories using Jaffe Cr methods making the diagnosis more frequently than those using enzymatic Cr methods (60% versus 39%).ConclusionsSignificant interlaboratory variability in Cr measurement still exists. Jaffe assays yield higher Cr values than enzymatic assays, leading to lower eGFR-EPIs and more frequent CKD diagnoses. Further improvements in assay performance are required to standardize patient CKD diagnosis and to facilitate longitudinal Cr monitoring across laboratories.

Dataset Information

Contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity risk assessment in adult inpatients: a comparison of serum creatinine level- and estimated glomerular filtration rate-based screening methods.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets