Dataset Information

Reproducibility of mandibular third molar assessment comparing two cone beam CT units in a matched pairs design.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the third molar assessment, comparing five observers and two cone beam CT (CBCT) units. 28 patients, each with two impacted mandibular third molars, were included. Each patient was randomly examined with a Scanora(®) 3D (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) CBCT unit in one mandibular third molar region and with a Cranex(®) 3D (Soredex) CBCT unit in the other region. Five observers with varying CBCT experience assessed all third molars and recorded the following variables: number and morphology of the roots, relation to the mandibular canal in two directions, shape of the canal and whether there was a direct contact between the roots of the molar and the mandibular canal. The radiographic assessments were compared pairwise among all observers for all variables. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used to test the differences in observer accordance percentages among the recorded variables in the images from the two units, and kappa statistics expressed interobserver reproducibility. The mean percentages for observer accordance ranged from 65.4 to 92.9 for Scanora 3D and 60.3 to 94.8 for Cranex 3D. There was no significant difference between the observer accordance in the two CBCT units (p > 0.05), except for assessing root flex in the mesiodistal direction, for which the observer accordance was higher for Scanora 3D (p < 0.05). Kappa values ranged from 0.1 to 1.0 for Scanora 3D and from 0.2 to 0.9 for Cranex 3D. For the variable "direct contact", the interobserver reproducibility was excellent for the two trained radiologists. The two units had almost similar interobserver reproducibility for mandibular third molar assessment. Observer variation existed, and experienced radiologists demonstrated the highest interobserver reproducibility for canal-related variables.

SUBMITTER: Matzen LH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3853511 | biostudies-other | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundVarious injection methods have been used to improve the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block and reduce the pain and complications. But these methods also have their advantages and disadvantages. A modified 3-distal site anesthesia injection method proposed in 2015 was used clinically with satisfactory results at some dental clinics in China. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of this modified 3-distal site anesthesia injection method for extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar from an anatomical point of view.MethodsThree-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and analysis of the mandibles was performed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning to measure the simulated needle insertion depth, infiltration distance, and other important parameters. These parameters were compared with an actual depth of 20 mm and a theoretic infiltration distance of 10 mm. The main parameters were compared between males and females.ResultsSixty-three CBCT datasets were imported into Simplant OMS software for 3D reconstruction. The left simulated insertion depth did not differ from 20 mm, while right insertion depth was >20 mm (P<0.05). The bilateral infiltration distances were <10 mm (P<0.05) and articaine blocked the IAN. The widths of the mandibular rami were greater than the syringe length (21 mm), thus it was not possible for the syringe to reach the distal edge of the mandible. There was no difference in the simulated needle insertion depth and infiltration distance between the left and right (P>0.05). The bilateral simulated insertion depths, infiltration distances, widths of the mandibular rami, and height of the left mandibular foramen in females were less than in males (P<0.05), while there was no difference in the height of the right mandibular foramen and bilateral insertion angles (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe modified 3-distal site anesthesia injection method was shown to block the IAN based on anatomic evidence derived from 3D analysis on the measurements by CBCT.

Dataset Information

Reproducibility of mandibular third molar assessment comparing two cone beam CT units in a matched pairs design.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets