Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bamba J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3922264 | biostudies-other | 2013
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:OBJECTIVES::To determine the optimized kV setting for a narrow detector cone-beam CT (CBCT) unit. METHODS::Clinical (CL) and quantitative (QUANT) evaluations of image quality were performed using an anthropomorphic phantom. Technical (TECH) evaluation was performed with a polymethyl methacrylate phantom. Images were obtained using a PaX-i3D Green CBCT (Vatech, Hwaseong, Korea) device, with a large 21 × 19?and a medium 12 × 9?cm field of view (FOV), and high-dose (HD-ranging from 85 to 110 kV) and low-dose (LD-ranging from 75 to 95 kV) protocols, totaling four groups (21 × 19?cm HD, 21 × 19?cm LD, 12 × 9?cm HD, 12 × 9?cm LD). The radiation dose within each group was fixed by adapting the mA according to a predetermined dose-area product. For CL evaluation, three observers assessed images based on overall quality, sharpness, contrast, artefacts, and noise. For QUANT evaluation, mean gray value shift, % increase of standard deviation (SD), % of beam hardening and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. For TECH evaluation, segmentation accuracy, CNR, metal artefact SD, metal object area, and sharpness were measured. Representative parameters were chosen for CL, QUANT, and TECH evaluations to determine the optimal kV based on biplot graphs. kV values of the same protocol were compared by the bootstrapping approach. The ones that had statistical differences with the best kV were considered as worse quality. RESULTS::Overall, kV values within the same group showed similar quality (p > 0.05), except for 110 kV in 21 × 19?cm HD and 85 kV in 12 × 9?cm HD of CL score; also 85, 90 kV in 21 × 19?cm HD and 75, 80 kV in 21 × 19?cm LD of QUANT score which were worse (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION::At a constant dose, low and high kV protocols yield acceptable image quality for a narrow-detector CBCT unit.
| S-EPMC6476352 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patient artefacts in dental cone beam CT scans can happen for various reasons. These range from artefacts from metal restorations to movement. An audit was carried out in the Glasgow Dental Hospital analysing how many scans showed signs of "motion artefact", and then to assess if there was any correlation between patient age and movement artefacts. Specific age demographics were then analysed to see if these cohorts were at a higher risk of "movement artefacts".
| S-EPMC3699018 | biostudies-other
Project description:PurposeTo compare cone-beam computed tomography (CT) navigation vs conventional CT image guidance during biopsies.Materials and methodsPatients scheduled for image-guided biopsies were prospectively and randomly assigned to conventional CT guidance vs cone-beam CT navigation. Radiation dose, accuracy of final needle position, rate of histopathologic diagnosis, and number of needle repositions to reach the target (defined as pullback to adjust position) were compared.ResultsA total of 58 patients (mean age, 57 y; 62.1% men) were randomized: 29 patients underwent 33 biopsies with CT guidance and 29 patients with 33 lesions underwent biopsy with cone-beam CT navigation. The average body mass index (BMI) was similar between groups, at 28.8 kg/m(2) ± 6.55 (P = .18). There was no difference between groups in terms of patient and lesion characteristics (eg, size, depth). The average lesion size was 29.1 ± 12.7mm for CT group vs 32.1mm ±16.8mm for cone-beam CT group (P < 0.59). Location of lesions was equally divided between the 2 groups, 20 lung lesions, 18 renal lesions and 20 other abdominal lesions. Mean number of needle repositions in the cone-beam CT group was 0.3 ± 0.5, compared with 1.9 ± 2.3 with conventional CT (P < .001). The average skin entry dose was 29% lower with cone-beam CT than with conventional CT (P < .04 accounting for BMI). The average estimated effective dose for the planning scan from phantom data was 49% lower with cone-beam CT vs conventional CT (P = .018). Accuracy, defined as the difference between planned and final needle positions, was 4.9 mm ± 4.1 for the cone-beam CT group, compared with 12.2 mm ± 8.1 for conventional CT (P < .001). Histopathologic diagnosis rates were similar between groups, at 90.9% for conventional CT and 93.9% for cone-beam CT (P = .67).ConclusionsCone-beam CT navigation for biopsies improved targeting accuracy with fewer needle repositions, lower skin entry dose, and lower effective dose for planning scan, and a comparable histopathologic diagnosis rate.
| S-EPMC7869923 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the consistency of therapy radiographers performing image registration using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-CT, magnetic resonance (MR)-CT, and MR-MR image guidance for cervix cancer radiotherapy and to assess that MR-based image guidance is not inferior to CBCT standard practice.Methods10 patients receiving cervix radiation therapy underwent daily CBCT guidance and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging weekly during treatment. Offline registration of each MR image, and corresponding CBCT, to planning CT was performed by five radiographers. MR images were also registered to the earliest MR interobserver variation was assessed using modified Bland-Altman analysis with clinically acceptable 95% limits of agreement (LoA) defined as ±5.0 mm.Results30 CBCT-CT, 30 MR-CT and 20 MR-MR registrations were performed by each observer. Registration variations between CBCT-CT and MR-CT were minor and both strategies resulted in 95% LoA over the clinical threshold in the anteroposterior direction (CBCT-CT ±5.8 mm, MR-CT ±5.4 mm). MR-MR registrations achieved a significantly improved 95% LoA in the anteroposterior direction (±4.3 mm). All strategies demonstrated similar results in lateral and longitudinal directions.ConclusionThe magnitude of interobserver variations between CBCT-CT and MR-CT were similar, confirming that MR-CT radiotherapy workflows are comparable to CBCT-CT image-guided radiotherapy. Our results suggest MR-MR radiotherapy workflows may be a superior registration strategy.Advances in knowledgeThis is the first publication quantifying interobserver registration of multimodality image registration strategies for cervix radical radiotherapy patients.
| S-EPMC7446016 | biostudies-literature
Project description:X-ray scatter is a major detriment to image quality in cone-beam CT (CBCT). Existing geometries exhibit strong differences in scatter susceptibility with more compact geometries, e.g., dental or musculoskeletal, benefiting from antiscatter grids, whereas in more extended geometries, e.g., IGRT, grid use carries tradeoffs in image quality per unit dose. This work assesses the tradeoffs in dose and image quality for grids applied in the context of low-dose CBCT on a mobile C-arm for image-guided surgery.Studies were performed on a mobile C-arm equipped with a flat-panel detector for high-quality CBCT. Antiscatter grids of grid ratio (GR) 6:1-12:1, 40 lp∕cm, were tested in "body" surgery, i.e., spine, using protocols for bone and soft-tissue visibility in the thoracic and abdominal spine. Studies focused on grid orientation, CT number accuracy, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in quantitative phantoms at constant dose.There was no effect of grid orientation on possible gridline artifacts, given accurate angle-dependent gain calibration. Incorrect calibration was found to result in gridline shadows in the projection data that imparted high-frequency artifacts in 3D reconstructions. Increasing GR reduced errors in CT number from 31%, thorax, and 37%, abdomen, for gridless operation to 2% and 10%, respectively, with a 12:1 grid, while image noise increased by up to 70%. The CNR of high-contrast objects was largely unaffected by grids, but low-contrast soft-tissues suffered reduction in CNR, 2%-65%, across the investigated GR at constant dose.While grids improved CT number accuracy, soft-tissue CNR was reduced due to attenuation of primary radiation. CNR could be restored by increasing dose by factors of ~1.6-2.5 depending on GR, e.g., increase from 4.6 mGy for the thorax and 12.5 mGy for the abdomen without antiscatter grids to approximately 12 mGy and 30 mGy, respectively, with a high-GR grid. However, increasing the dose poses a significant impediment to repeat intraoperative CBCT and can cause the cumulative intraoperative dose to exceed that of a single diagnostic CT scan. This places the mobile C-arm in the category of extended CBCT geometries with sufficient air gap for which the tradeoffs between CNR and dose typically do not favor incorporation of an antiscatter grid.
| S-EPMC3261054 | biostudies-other
Project description:BACKGROUND:To develop a low-dose cone beam CT (LD-CBCT) reconstruction method named simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique and dual-dictionary learning (SART-DDL) joint algorithm for image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and evaluate its imaging quality and clinical application ability. METHODS:In this retrospective study, 62 CBCT image sets from February 2018 to July 2018 at west china hospital were randomly collected from 42 head and neck patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 49.7 [11.4] years, 12 females and 30 males). All image sets were retrospectively reconstructed by SART-DDL (resultant D-CBCT image sets) with 18% less clinical raw projections. Reconstruction quality was evaluated by quantitative parameters compared with SART and Total Variation minimization (SART-TV) joint reconstruction algorithm with paired t test. Five-grade subjective grading evaluations were done by two oncologists in a blind manner compared with clinically used Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm CBCT images (resultant F-CBCT image sets) and the grading results were compared by paired Wilcoxon rank test. Registration results between D-CBCT and F-CBCT were compared. D-CBCT image geometry fidelity was tested. RESULTS:The mean peak signal to noise ratio of D-CBCT was 1.7?dB higher than SART-TV reconstructions (P?<?.001, SART-DDL vs SART-TV, 36.36?±?0.55?dB vs 34.68?±?0.28?dB). All D-CBCT images were recognized as clinically acceptable without significant difference with F-CBCT in subjective grading (P?>?.05). In clinical registration, the maximum translational and rotational difference was 1.8?mm and 1.7 degree respectively. The horizontal, vertical and sagittal geometry fidelity of D-CBCT were acceptable. CONCLUSIONS:The image quality, geometry fidelity and clinical application ability of D-CBCT are comparable to that of the F-CBCT for head-and-neck patients with 18% less projections by SART-DDL.
| S-EPMC7425566 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recent advances in compressed sensing (CS) enable accurate CT image reconstruction from highly undersampled and noisy projection measurements, due to the sparsifiable feature of most CT images using total variation (TV). These novel reconstruction methods have demonstrated advantages in clinical applications where radiation dose reduction is critical, such as onboard cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging in radiation therapy. The image reconstruction using CS is formulated as either a constrained problem to minimize the TV objective within a small and fixed data fidelity error, or an unconstrained problem to minimize the data fidelity error with TV regularization. However, the conventional solutions to the above two formulations are either computationally inefficient or involved with inconsistent regularization parameter tuning, which significantly limit the clinical use of CS-based iterative reconstruction. In this paper, we propose an optimization algorithm for CS reconstruction which overcomes the above two drawbacks.The data fidelity tolerance of CS reconstruction can be well estimated based on the measured data, as most of the projection errors are from Poisson noise after effective data correction for scatter and beam-hardening effects. We therefore adopt the TV optimization framework with a data fidelity constraint. To accelerate the convergence, we first convert such a constrained optimization using a logarithmic barrier method into a form similar to that of the conventional TV regularization based reconstruction but with an automatically adjusted penalty weight. The problem is then solved efficiently by gradient projection with an adaptive Barzilai-Borwein step-size selection scheme. The proposed algorithm is referred to as accelerated barrier optimization for CS (ABOCS), and evaluated using both digital and physical phantom studies.ABOCS directly estimates the data fidelity tolerance from the raw projection data. Therefore, as demonstrated in both digital Shepp-Logan and physical head phantom studies, consistent reconstruction performances are achieved using the same algorithm parameters on scans with different noise levels and∕or on different objects. On the contrary, the penalty weight in a TV regularization based method needs to be fine-tuned in a large range (up to seven times) to maintain the reconstructed image quality. The improvement of ABOCS on computational efficiency is demonstrated in the comparisons with adaptive-steepest-descent-projection-onto-convex-sets (ASD-POCS), an existing CS reconstruction algorithm also using constrained optimization. ASD-POCS alternatively minimizes the TV objective using adaptive steepest descent (ASD) and the data fidelity error using projection onto convex sets (POCS). For similar image qualities of the Shepp-Logan phantom, ABOCS requires less computation time than ASD-POCS in MATLAB by more than one order of magnitude.We propose ABOCS for CBCT reconstruction. As compared to other published CS-based algorithms, our method has attractive features of fast convergence and consistent parameter settings for different datasets. These advantages have been demonstrated on phantom studies.
| S-EPMC3412436 | biostudies-other
Project description:Cone beam CT (CBCT) in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) offers a tremendous advantage for treatment guidance. The associated imaging dose is a clinical concern. One unique feature of CBCT-based IGRT is that the same patient is repeatedly scanned during a treatment course, and the contents of CBCT images at different fractions are similar. The authors propose a progressive dose control (PDC) scheme to utilize this temporal correlation for imaging dose reduction.A dynamic CBCT scan protocol, as opposed to the static one in the current clinical practice, is proposed to gradually reduce the imaging dose in each treatment fraction. The CBCT image from each fraction is processed by a prior-image based nonlocal means (PINLM) module to enhance its quality. The increasing amount of prior information from previous CBCT images prevents degradation of image quality due to the reduced imaging dose. Two proof-of-principle experiments have been conducted using measured phantom data and Monte Carlo simulated patient data with deformation.In the measured phantom case, utilizing a prior image acquired at 0.4 mAs, PINLM is able to improve the image quality of a CBCT acquired at 0.2 mAs by reducing the noise level from 34.95 to 12.45 HU. In the synthetic patient case, acceptable image quality is maintained at four consecutive fractions with gradually decreasing exposure levels of 0.4, 0.1, 0.07, and 0.05 mAs. When compared with the standard low-dose protocol of 0.4 mAs for each fraction, an overall imaging dose reduction of more than 60% is achieved.PINLM-PDC is able to reduce CBCT imaging dose in IGRT utilizing the temporal correlations among the sequence of CBCT images while maintaining the quality.
| S-EPMC3669143 | biostudies-other
Project description:OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess artefacts and their impact on cone beam CT (CBCT) image quality (IQ) after head motion simulated by a robot skull. METHODS: A fully dentate human skull incorporated into a robot simulated pre-determined patient movements. Ten head motion patterns were selected based on the movement of the C-arm of the CBCT units (no motion as reference). Three CBCT units were used [a three-dimensional eXam (K) (KaVo Dental GmbH, Biberach, Germany), a Promax 3D MAX (P) (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and a Scanora(®) 3D (S) (Soredex Oy, Tuusula, Finland)]. Axial images were qualitatively assessed at three levels: mental foramen (MF), infraorbital foramen and supraorbital foramen, and artefacts characterized as stripe-like, double contours, unsharpness or ring-like. A 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to quantitatively assess IQ. Cross-sectional images of the lower third molar and MF bilaterally were also evaluated by VAS. Four blinded examiners assessed the images. RESULTS: For all units and motion patterns, stripe-like artefacts were the most common. The four observers agreed on the presence of at least one artefact type in 90% of the images. Axial images showed lower overall IQ after motion (VAS = 72.4 ± 24.0 mm) than reference images (VAS = 97.3 ± 2.6 mm). The most severe artefacts were seen at the MF level. For cross-sectional images, IQ was lowest after tremor. The mean IQ range was 74-89 and 57-90 for isolated (tilting, rotation and nodding) and combined (nodding + tilting and rotation + tilting) movements, respectively. IQ for MF was lower than for third molar for any movement except tremor. CONCLUSIONS: Head motion of any type resulted in artefacts in CBCT images. The impact on IQ depended on the region and level in the skull.
| S-EPMC3699011 | biostudies-other
Project description:To demonstrate the feasibility of reconstructing a cone-beam CT (CBCT) image by deformably altering a prior fan-beam CT (FBCT) image such that it matches the anatomy portrayed in the CBCT projection data set.A prior FBCT image of the patient is assumed to be available as a source image. A CBCT projection data set is obtained and used as a target image set. A parametrized deformation model is applied to the source FBCT image, digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) that emulate the CBCT projection image geometry are calculated and compared to the target CBCT projection data, and the deformation model parameters are adjusted iteratively until the DRRs optimally match the CBCT projection data set. The resulting deformed FBCT image is hypothesized to be an accurate representation of the patient's anatomy imaged by the CBCT system. The process is demonstrated via numerical simulation. A known deformation is applied to a prior FBCT image and used to create a synthetic set of CBCT target projections. The iterative projection matching process is then applied to reconstruct the deformation represented in the synthetic target projections; the reconstructed deformation is then compared to the known deformation. The sensitivity of the process to the number of projections and the DRR/CBCT projection mismatch is explored by systematically adding noise to and perturbing the contrast of the target projections relative to the iterated source DRRs and by reducing the number of projections.When there is no noise or contrast mismatch in the CBCT projection images, a set of 64 projections allows the known deformed CT image to be reconstructed to within a nRMS error of 1% and the known deformation to within a nRMS error of 7%. A CT image nRMS error of less than 4% is maintained at noise levels up to 3% of the mean projection intensity, at which the deformation error is 13%. At 1% noise level, the number of projections can be reduced to 8 while maintaining CT image and deformation errors of less than 4% and 13%, respectively. The method is sensitive to contrast mismatch between the simulated projections and the target projections when the soft-tissue contrast in the projections is low.By using prior knowledge available in a FBCT image, the authors show that a CBCT image can be iteratively reconstructed from a comparatively small number of projection images, thus saving acquisition time and reducing imaging dose. This will enable more frequent daily imaging during radiation therapy. Because the process preserves the CT numbers of the FBCT image, the resulting 3D image intensities will be more accurate than a CBCT image reconstructed via conventional backprojection methods. Reconstruction errors are insensitive to noise at levels beyond what would typically be found in CBCT projection data, but are sensitive to contrast mismatch errors between the CBCT projection data and the DRRs.
| S-EPMC2997812 | biostudies-other