Dataset Information

Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for post mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen PMRT patients previously treated at our clinic with helical tomotherapy (HT) were identified for the study. Planning target volumes (PTV) included the chest wall and regional lymph nodes. A systematic approach to constructing VMAT that met the clinical goals was devised. VMAT plans were then constructed for each patient and compared with HT plans with which they had been treated. The resulting plans were compared on the basis of PTV coverage; dose homogeneity index (DHI) and conformity index (CI); dose to organs at risk (OAR); tumor control probability (TCP), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and secondary cancer complication probability (SCCP); and treatment delivery time. Differences were tested for significance using the paired Student's t-test. RESULTS: Both modalities produced clinically acceptable PMRT plans. VMAT plans showed better CI (p<0.01) and better OAR sparing at low doses than HT plans, particularly at doses less than 5 Gy. On the other hand, HT plans showed better DHI (p<0.01) and showed better OAR sparing at higher doses. Both modalities achieved nearly 100% tumor control probability and approximately 1% NTCP in the lungs and heart. VMAT showed lower SCCP than HT (p<0.01), though both plans showed higher SCCP values than conventional mixed beam (electron-photon) plans reported by our group previously. VMAT plans required 66.2% less time to deliver than HT. CONCLUSIONS: Both VMAT and HT provide acceptable treatment plans for PMRT. Both techniques are currently utilized at our institution.

SUBMITTER: Nichols GP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3984750 | biostudies-other | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment.

Nichols Geoffrey P GP Fontenot Jonas D JD Gibbons John P JP Sanders Mary Ella ME

Radiation oncology (London, England) 20140226

<h4>Purpose</h4>To examine the feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for post mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT).<h4>Methods and materials</h4>Fifteen PMRT patients previously treated at our clinic with helical tomotherapy (HT) were identified for the study. Planning target volumes (PTV) included the chest wall and regional lymph nodes. A systematic approach to constructing VMAT that met the clinical goals was devised. VMAT plans were then constructed for each patient and compared w ...[more]

PMID: 24571913

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo create and to validate knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) models for breast cancer treatments without lymph node irradiation.Materials and methodsOne hundred VMAT-based breast plans (manual plans [MP]) were selected to create two knowledge-based VMAT models (breast left and breast right) using RapidPlan™. The plans were generated on Eclipse v15.5 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with 6 MV of a Novalis Tx equipped with a high-resolution multileaf collimator. The models were verified based on goodness-of-fit statistics using the coefficients of determination (R 2) and Chi-square (χ2), and the goodness-of-estimation statistics through the mean square error (MSE). Geometrical and dosimetrical constraints were identified and removed from the RP models using statistical evaluation metrics and plots. For validation, 20 plans that integrate the models and 20 plans that do not were reoptimized with RP (closed and opened validation). Dosimetrical parameters of interest were used to compare MP versus RP plans for the Heart, Homolateral_Lung, Contralateral_Lung, and Contralateral_Breast. Optimization planning time and user independency were also analyzed.ResultsThe most unfavorable results of R2 in both models for the organs at risk were as follows: for Contralateral_Lung 0.51 in RP right breast (RP_RB) and for Heart 0.60 in RP left breast (RP_LB). The most unfavorable results of χ2 test were: for Contralateral_Breast 1.02 in RP_RB and for Heart 1.03 in RP_LB. These goodness-of-fit results show that no overfitting occurred in either of the models. There were no unfavorable results of mean square error (MSE, all < 0.05) in any of the two models. These goodness-of-estimation results show that the models have good estimation power. For closed validation, significant differences were found in RP_RB for Homolateral_Lung (all P ≤ 0.001), and in the RP_LB differences were found for the heart (all P ≤ 0.04) and for Homolateral_Lung (all P ≤ 0.022). For open validation, no statistically significant differences were obtained in either of the models. RP models had little impact on reducing optimization planning times for expert planners; nevertheless, the result showed a 30% reduction time for beginner planners. The use of RP models generates high-quality plans, without differences from the planner experience.ConclusionTwo RP models for breast cancer treatment using VMAT were successfully implemented. The use of RP models for breast cancer reduces the optimization planning time and improves the efficiency of the treatment planning process while ensuring high-quality plans.

Project description:It is crucial to spare lung when treating early stage lung carcinoma with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for minimizing the radiation induced toxicities, such as radiation pneumonitis and late fibrosis. A retrospective study was performed with a combination of approaches to determine the optimal range of prescription isodose line (P-IDL) within which lung tissue was best spared in SBRT plans with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Monte-Carlo-like dose calculation algorithm. Twenty clinically-delivered SBRT lung plans were optimized using traditional LINAC MLC based approaches: an average P-IDL of (88.8 ± 0.5)% (the error bar of all the data is the 95% confidence interval (CI)). The plans were then re-optimized using a new combination of approaches with variation of P-IDL from 60% to 90% for each case. The combination of approaches included finding and utilizing an optimal P-IDL, implementing tuning ring structures internal and external to the target, as well as normal tissue objective and equivalent. The plans were evaluated with the following indexes: 1. R50%, the ratio of 50% prescription isodose volume to the plan target volume (PTV); 2. V20 and V5, the volume of lung within 20Gy and 5Gy, respectively; 3. PCI, the Paddick comformity index; 4. D2cm, the maximum dose at 2 cm from PTV in any direction; 5. MLD, the mean dose in total lung volume; 6. Focal Index (FI), an indicator of dose in the core of the target. The optimal P-IDL was found to be in the range of 75-80%. The average optimal P-IDL for the 20 cases was (77.9 ± 0.9)%. With the optimization strategies the average PCI was increased by (10.3 ± 2.1)%; the average R50%, V20, V5, D2cm and MLD were decreased by (29.1 ± 4.1)%, (26.9 ± 5.4)%, (13.9 ± 3.5)%, (13.4 ± 4.3)% and (16.7 ± 2.3)%, respectively. The FI was increased by (23.7 ± 1.3)%. The optimal P-IDL range was 75-80% for SBRT VMAT lung treatment plans. The application of the set of optimization approaches can significantly improve the lung sparing in SBRT VMAT plans with AXB dose calculation algorithm and makes treatment plans more conformal in high, intermediate and low dose regions, while higher dose is delivered to the target.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment.

Publications

Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for postmastectomy treatment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets