Dataset Information

EM reconstruction of dual isotope PET using staggered injections and prompt gamma positron emitters.

ABSTRACT: The aim of dual isotope positron emission tomography (DIPET) is to create two separate images of two coinjected PET radiotracers. DIPET shortens the duration of the study, reduces patient discomfort, and produces perfectly coregistered images compared to the case when two radiotracers would be imaged independently (sequential PET studies). Reconstruction of data from such simultaneous acquisition of two PET radiotracers is difficult because positron decay of any isotope creates only 511 keV photons; therefore, the isotopes cannot be differentiated based on the detected energy.Recently, the authors have proposed a DIPET technique that uses a combination of radiotracer A which is a pure positron emitter (such as(18)F or (11)C) and radiotracer B in which positron decay is accompanied by the emission of a high-energy (HE) prompt gamma (such as (38)K or (60)Cu). Events that are detected as triple coincidences of HE gammas with the corresponding two 511 keV photons allow the authors to identify the lines-of-response (LORs) of isotope B. These LORs are used to separate the two intertwined distributions, using a dedicated image reconstruction algorithm. In this work the authors propose a new version of the DIPET EM-based reconstruction algorithm that allows the authors to include an additional, independent estimate of radiotracer A distribution which may be obtained if radioisotopes are administered using a staggered injections method. In this work the method is tested on simple simulations of static PET acquisitions.The authors' experiments performed using Monte-Carlo simulations with static acquisitions demonstrate that the combined method provides better results (crosstalk errors decrease by up to 50%) than the positron-gamma DIPET method or staggered injections alone.The authors demonstrate that the authors' new EM algorithm which combines information from triple coincidences with prompt gammas and staggered injections improves the accuracy of DIPET reconstructions for static acquisitions so they reach almost the benchmark level calculated for perfectly separated tracers.

SUBMITTER: Andreyev A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3987693 | biostudies-other | 2014 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Infiltrations of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) injections affect positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) image quality and quantification. A device using scintillation sensors (Lucerno Dynamics, Cary, NC) provides dynamic measurements acquired during FDG uptake to identify and characterize radioactivity near the injection site prior to patient imaging. Our aim was to compare sensor measurements against dynamic PET image acquisition, our proposed reference in assessing injection quality during the uptake period. Methods: Subjects undergoing routine FDG PET/CT imaging were eligible for this Institutional Review Board approved prospective study. After providing informed consent, subjects had sensors topically placed on their arms. FDG was injected into subjects' veins directly on the PET imaging table. Dynamic images of the injection site were acquired during 45 min of the uptake period. These dynamic image acquisitions and subjects' routine standard static images were evaluated by nuclear medicine physicians for abnormal FDG accumulation near the injection site. Sensor measurements were interpreted independently by Lucerno staff. Dynamic image acquisition interpretation results were compared to the sensor measurement interpretations and to static image interpretations. Results: Twenty-four subjects were consented and enrolled. Data from 21 subjects were gathered. During dynamic image acquisition review, physicians interpreted 4 subjects with no FDG accumulation at the injection site, whereas 17 showed evidence of accumulation. In 10 of the 17 cases that showed FDG accumulation, the FDG presence at the injection site resolved completely during uptake corresponding to venous stasis, the temporary sequestration of blood from circulation. Static image interpretation agreed with dynamic images interpretation in 11/21 (52%) subjects. Sensor measurement interpretations agreed with the dynamic images interpretations in 18/21 (86%) subjects. Conclusions: Sensor measurements can be an effective way to identify and characterize infiltrations and venous stasis. Comparable to an infiltration, venous stasis may produce spurious and clinically meaningful measurement bias and possibly even scan misinterpretation. Since the quality and quantification of PET/CT studies are of clinical importance, sensor measurements acquired during the FDG uptake may prove to be a useful quality control measure to reduce infiltration rates and potentially improve patient care. Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03041090.

Project description:BackgroundPositron-emission tomography (PET) simulators are frequently used for development and performance evaluation of segmentation methods or quantitative uptake metrics. To date, most PET simulation tools are based on Monte Carlo simulations, which are computationally demanding. Other analytical simulation tools lack the implementation of time of flight (TOF) or resolution modelling (RM). In this study, a fast and easy-to-use PET simulation-reconstruction package, SiMulAtion and ReconsTruction (SMART)-PET, is developed and validated, which includes both TOF and RM. SMART-PET, its documentation and instructions to calibrate the tool to a specific PET/CT system are available on Zenodo. SMART-PET allows the fast generation of 3D PET images. As input, it requires one image representing the activity distribution and one representing the corresponding CT image/attenuation map. It allows the user to adjust different parameters, such as reconstruction settings (TOF/RM), noise level or scan duration. Furthermore, a random spatial shift can be included, representing patient repositioning. To evaluate the tool, simulated images were compared with real scan data of the NEMA NU 2 image quality phantom. The scan was acquired as a 60-min list-mode scan and reconstructed with and without TOF and/or RM. For every reconstruction setting, ten statistically equivalent images, representing 30, 60, 120 and 300 s scan duration, were generated. Simulated and real-scan data were compared regarding coefficient of variation in the phantom background and activity recovery coefficients (RCs) of the spheres. Furthermore, standard deviation images of each of the ten statistically equivalent images were compared.ResultsSMART-PET produces images comparable to actual phantom data. The image characteristics of simulated and real PET images varied in similar ways as function of reconstruction protocols and noise levels. The change in image noise with variation of simulated TOF settings followed the theoretically expected behaviour. RC as function of sphere size agreed within 0.3-11% between simulated and actual phantom data.ConclusionsSMART-PET allows for rapid and easy simulation of PET data. The user can change various acquisition and reconstruction settings (including RM and TOF) and noise levels. The images obtained show similar image characteristics as those seen in actual phantom data.

Dataset Information

EM reconstruction of dual isotope PET using staggered injections and prompt gamma positron emitters.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure