Dataset Information

Thin-beam ultrasound overestimation of blood flow: how wide is your beam?

ABSTRACT: It has been predicted that the development of thin-beam ultrasound could lead to an overestimation of mean blood velocity by up to 33% as beam width approaches 0% of vessel diameter. If both beam and vessel widths are known, in theory, this overestimation may be correctable. Therefore, we updated a method for determining the beam width of a Doppler ultrasound system, tested the utility of this technique and the information it provides to reliably correct for the error in velocity measurements, and explored how error-corrected velocity estimates impact the interpretation of in vivo data. Using a string phantom, we found the average beam width of four different probes varied across probes from 2.93 ± 0.05 to 4.41 ± 0.06 mm (mean ± SD) and with depth of insonation. Using this information, we tested the validity of a calculated correction factor to minimize the thin-beam error in mean velocity observed in a flow phantom with known diameter. Use of a correction factor reduced the overestimation from 39 ± 11 to 7 ± 9% (P < 0.05). Lastly, in vivo we explored how knowledge of beam width improves understanding of physiological flow conditions. In vivo, use of a correction factor reduced the overestimation of mean velocity from 23 ± 11 to -4 ± 9% (P < 0.05). Thus this large source of error is real, has been largely ignored by the early adaptors of Doppler ultrasound for vascular physiology studies in humans, and is correctable by the described techniques.

SUBMITTER: Buck TM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4035793 | biostudies-other | 2014 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Thin-beam ultrasound overestimation of blood flow: how wide is your beam?

Buck Tahisha M TM Sieck Dylan C DC Halliwill John R JR

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 20140220 8

It has been predicted that the development of thin-beam ultrasound could lead to an overestimation of mean blood velocity by up to 33% as beam width approaches 0% of vessel diameter. If both beam and vessel widths are known, in theory, this overestimation may be correctable. Therefore, we updated a method for determining the beam width of a Doppler ultrasound system, tested the utility of this technique and the information it provides to reliably correct for the error in velocity measurements, a ...[more]

PMID: 24557801

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDual-venc 4D flow MRI, recently introduced for the assessment of intracranial hemodynamics, may provide a promising complementary approach to well-established tools such as transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and overcome some of their disadvantages. However, data comparing intracranial flow measures from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD are lacking.PurposeTo compare cerebral blood flow velocity measures derived from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD.Study typeProspective cohort.SubjectsA total of 25 healthy participants (56 ± 4 years old, 44% female).Field strength/sequenceA 3 T/dual-venc 4D flow MRI using a time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast sequence with three-dimensional velocity encoding.AssessmentPeak velocity measurements in bilateral middle cerebral arteries (MCA) were quantified from dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD. The MRI data were quantified by two independent observers (S.M and Y.M.) and TCD was performed by a trained technician (A.L.M.). We assessed the agreement between 4D flow MRI and TCD measures, and the interobserver agreement of 4D flow MRI measurements.Statistical testsPeak velocity from MRI and TCD was compared using Bland-Altman analysis and coefficient of variance. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess MRI interobserver agreement. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThere was excellent interobserver agreement in dual-venc 4D flow MRI-based measurements of peak velocity in bilateral MCA (ICC = 0.97 and 0.96 for the left and right MCA, respectively). Dual-venc 4D flow MRI significantly underestimated peak velocity in the left and right MCA compared to TCD (bias = 0.13 [0.59, -0.33] m/sec and 0.15 [0.47, -0.17] m/sec, respectively). The coefficient of variance between dual-venc 4D flow MRI and TCD measurements was 26% for the left MCA and 22% for the right MCA.Data conclusionThere was excellent interobserver agreement for the assessment of MCA peak velocity using dual-venc 4D flow MRI, and ≤20% under-estimation compared with TCD.Evidence level3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Project description:New findingsWhat is the central question of this study? Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be used to directly assess skeletal muscle perfusion but its day-to-day repeatability over time has not yet been validated: is CEUS a repeatable method for the measurement of skeletal muscle microvascular blood flow (MBF) at rest and in response to exercise, across independent assessment sessions? What is the main finding and its importance? A strong agreement between CEUS MBF measures across sessions suggests it is a repeatable method for assessing skeletal muscle perfusion over time. This validation provides confidence for incorporating these measures into longitudinal studies such as a chronic intervention or disease progression to gain further knowledge of skeletal muscle microvascular function.AbstractContrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be used to directly assess skeletal muscle perfusion. However, its repeatability over time has not yet been validated and therefore its use in longitudinal measures (i.e., exploring the impact of a chronic intervention or disease progression) is limited. This study aimed to determine the repeatability of CEUS for the measurement of skeletal muscle microvascular blood flow (MBF) at baseline and in response to exercise, across independent assessment sessions. Ten healthy volunteers (five female; 30 ± 6 years) had CEUS of the right vastus lateralis recorded in two separate sessions, 14 days apart. Measurements were taken at baseline, during an isometric leg extension and during recovery. Acoustic intensity data from a region of interest were plotted as a replenishment curve to obtain blood volume (A) and flow velocity (β) values from a one-phase association non-linear regression of mean tissue echogenicity. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses of A and β values were performed, with significance assumed as P < 0.05. Strong positive correlations were observed across sessions for all A and β values (both P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias (SD) of -0.013 ± 1.24 for A and -0.014 ± 0.31 for β. A bias of 0.201 ± 0.770 at baseline, 0.527 ± 1.29 during contraction and -0.203 ± 1.29 at recovery was observed for A, and -0.0328 ± 0.0853 (baseline), -0.0446 ± 0.206 (contraction) and 0.0382 ± 0.233 (recovery) for β. A strong agreement between CEUS MBF measures across independent sessions suggests it to be a repeatable method for assessing skeletal muscle perfusion over time, and therefore facilitates wider use in longitudinal studies.

Project description:Being able to map accurately placental blood flow in clinics could have major implications in the diagnosis and follow-up of pregnancy complications such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Moreover, the impact of such an imaging modality for a better diagnosis of placental dysfunction would require to solve the unsolved problem of discriminating the strongly intricated maternal and fetal vascular networks. However, no current imaging modality allows both to achieve sufficient sensitivity and selectivity to tell these entangled flows apart. Although ultrasound imaging would be the clinical modality of choice for such a problem, conventional Doppler echography both lacks of sensibility to detect and map the placenta microvascularization and a concept to discriminate both entangled flows. In this work, we propose to use an ultrafast Doppler imaging approach both to map with an enhanced sensitivity the small vessels of the placenta (~100 μm) and to assess the variation of the Doppler frequency simultaneously in all pixels of the image within a cardiac cycle. This approach is evaluated in vivo in the placenta of pregnant rabbits: By studying the local flow pulsatility pixel per pixel, it becomes possible to separate maternal and fetal blood in 2D from their pulsatile behavior. Significance Statement: The in vivo ability to image and discriminate maternal and fetal blood flow within the placenta is an unsolved problem which could improve the diagnosis of pregnancy complications such as intrauterine growth restriction or preeclampsia. To date, no imaging modality has both sufficient sensitivity and selectivity to discriminate these intimately entangled flows. We demonstrate that Ultrafast Doppler ultrasound method with a frame rate 100x faster than conventional imaging solves this issue. It permits the mapping of small vessels of the placenta (~100 μm) in 2D with an enhanced sensitivity. By assessing pixel-per-pixel pulsatility within single cardiac cycles, it achieves maternal and fetal blood flow discrimination.

Dataset Information

Thin-beam ultrasound overestimation of blood flow: how wide is your beam?

Publications

Thin-beam ultrasound overestimation of blood flow: how wide is your beam?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets