Implementation of a nurse-delivered intravitreal injection service.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: DaCosta J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4058629 | biostudies-other | 2014 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundTo describe the design, implementation, and evaluation of a nurse-led intravitreal injection (NL-IVT) programme in a Singapore tertiary eye hospital.MethodsPatients requiring anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) IVT were recruited. Implementation and evaluation were done in the Singapore National Eye Centre, a tertiary centre. To assess safety, nurse injectors recorded details of procedures performed and complications for an 8-month period from February 2019. To evaluate patient experience, we used a modified patient questionnaire and recorded both patients' waiting time and IVT procedure duration. A retrospective audit of IVTs before and after the introduction of NL-IVT was performed from January 2017 to September 2019. Cost difference between NL-IVT and standard doctor-led (DL) IVT was evaluated.ResultsA total of 8599 NL-IVTs were performed. No cases of severe complication were detected in the follow-up. A total of 135 patients who received NL-IVT and DL-IVT were surveyed. General satisfaction, interpersonal manner, financial aspect, time spent with injector, and staff competence were higher in NL-IVTs than in DL-IVTs (p < 0.05). There were no differences in terms of technical quality and communication. For 934 patients, waiting time was significantly shorter in NL-IVT (3.6 ± 10.3 min) compared with DL-IVTs (35.3 ± 32.3 min); on average, 19.7 min were saved through NL-IVT (p < 0.01). The cost difference per IVT between NL-IVT and DL-IVT is estimated at 286 SGD (163 GBP).ConclusionWith a well-designed training programme, NL-IVT is a safe, acceptable, and cost savings procedure. With increasing demand for IVT, NL-IVT provides an alternative model of care for healthcare systems globally.
| S-EPMC7784933 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionIntravitreal injection of therapeutic medications has become one of the most commonly performed procedures in ophthalmology. Over the past decade, a number of guidelines have been published that recommend proper techniques to increase the safety of intravitreal injections. In this course, we teach and practice the skills necessary to perform safe intravitreal injections.MethodsThe course was developed for first-year ophthalmology residents and was designed to be delivered in one 2-hour session. Associated materials include guidelines for faculty facilitators and residents to prepare them for safe intravitreal injection of therapeutic medications. Also included are a slide presentation, wet-lab practice guidelines, and an evaluation form.ResultsLearner response has been universally very positive. Residents (N = 15) have reported that structured lectures with practice in the wet lab improved their skill for intravitreal injection of therapeutic medication.DiscussionOverall, we found that our curriculum improved learner knowledge about safe intravitreal injections and learners' self-assessed confidence in the three objectives of the curriculum.
| S-EPMC6440421 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of Teach-Back on communication quality in a national telephone-based telehealth service, for callers varying in health literacy.DesignCross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trial with continuous recruitment, short (fixed) exposure and blinded outcome assessors. Nurses were stratified by hours worked and randomised into training groups using a computer generated sequence.SettingAn Australian national pregnancy and parenting telephone helpline.InterventionComplex intervention involving a single 2-hour group Teach-Back training session, combined with ongoing nurse self-reflection on their communication following each call and each shift.ParticipantsParticipants were 637 callers to the telephone helpline aged 18-75 (87% female), of whom 127 (13%) had inadequate health literacy (measured with the Single Item Literacy Screener); and 15 maternal and child health nurses with 15 years' experience on average.MeasuresPrimary outcome was a modified subscale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire, 'having sufficient information to manage health'. Secondary caller outcomes included caller confidence, perceived actionability of information and nurse effort to listen and understand. Nurse outcomes were perceptions of their communication effectiveness.ResultsOver a 7 week period, 376 surveyed callers received usual care and 261 Teach-Back. Ratings on the primary outcome increased over time (OR 1.17, CI 1.01 to 1.32, p = 0.03) but no independent Teach-Back effect was observed. A consistent pattern suggests that, compared with usual care, Teach-Back helps callers with inadequate health literacy feel listened to (OR 2.3, CI 0.98 to 5.42, p = 0.06), confident to act (OR 2.44, CI 1.00 to 5.98, p = 0.06), and know what steps to take (OR 2.68, CI 1.00 to 7.17, p = 0.06). Nurse perceptions of both their own communication effectiveness (OR = 2.31; CI 1.38 to 3.86, p<0.0001), and caller understanding (OR = 2.56; CI 1.52 to 4.30, p<0.001) both increased with Teach-Back. No harms were reported.ConclusionsTeach-Back appears to benefit telephone health service users with inadequate health literacy, but the extent of this is unclear due to smaller numbers of lower literacy participants. Improving caller ratings over time are likely due to increasing nurse communication competence.
| S-EPMC6209310 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness, procedure time and safety outcomes of two different intravitreal injections (IVI) techniques.MethodsThis was a prospective, single-center, randomized clinical trial of 200 adult eyes receiving intravitreal medications for various indications. Eyes were assigned (1:1) to undergo IVI using either an intravitreal injection guide (IIG) (n= 100) or conventional dual blade speculum plus surgical caliper (DBS) (n=100). All IVI were administered using a 30-gauge needle placed 4 mm posterior to the inferior limbus. The main outcome measures were rate of successful IVI administration, procedure time (seconds) as measured by a stopwatch from application to removal of IIG or DBS, patient preference for IVI technique and adverse events.ResultsThe two groups were similar in terms of mean age (P=0.398), laterality (P=0.671), indication for treatment (P=0.175) and medication type (P=0.489). All IVI procedures were successfully completed in both groups. The mean procedure time was shorter using the IIG (9.94 ± 2.87 seconds) versus DBS (21.85 ± 7.25 seconds) technique (P ≤ 0.01). The incidence of post-injection subconjunctival hemorrhage was higher when the DBS was applied (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.22-4.53). Patients with previous history of IVI preferred the IIG over the DBS. No other injection-related adverse events were observed in both groups.ConclusionDBS and IIG techniques are similarly effective and safe for the administration of intravitreal medications. The IIG appears to significantly reduce procedure time, be associated with a lower incidence of subconjunctival hemorrhage and engender better patient acceptance.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04455399).
| S-EPMC8197588 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PURPOSE: The use of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor medications has widened considerably to include indications affecting females of reproductive age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present our experiences following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab during the first trimester of unrecognised pregnancies in four women. RESULTS: All our patients were inadvertently exposed to bevacizumab within the first trimester when placental growth and fetal organogenesis take place. There were three cases of pregnancy without complication and one case of complicated pregnancy in which there was a significant past obstetric history. CONCLUSION: This case series provides further insights into intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in early pregnancy. There is insufficient information to suggest that such use is safe, nor is there definitive evidence to suggest that it causes harm. We advise that ophthalmologists discuss pregnancy with women of childbearing age undergoing intraocular anti-VEGF injections. Should a woman become pregnant, counselling is needed to explain the potential risks and benefits, and the limited available data relating to the use of these agents in early pregnancy.
| S-EPMC3983635 | biostudies-other
Project description:PurposeAdeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2) has been shown to be effective in transducing inner retinal neurons after intravitreal injection in several species. However, results in nonprimates may not be predictive of transduction in the human inner retina, because of differences in eye size and the specialized morphology of the high-acuity human fovea. This was a study of inner retina transduction in the macaque, a primate with ocular characteristics most similar to that of humans.MethodsIn vivo imaging and histology were used to examine GFP expression in the macaque inner retina after intravitreal injection of AAV vectors containing five distinct promoters.ResultsAAV2 produced pronounced GFP expression in inner retinal cells of the fovea, no expression in the central retina beyond the fovea, and variable expression in the peripheral retina. AAV2 vector incorporating the neuronal promoter human connexin 36 (hCx36) transduced ganglion cells within a dense annulus around the fovea center, whereas AAV2 containing the ubiquitous promoter hybrid cytomegalovirus (CMV) enhancer/chicken-?-actin (CBA) transduced both Müller and ganglion cells in a dense circular disc centered on the fovea. With three shorter promoters--human synapsin (hSYN) and the shortened CBA and hCx36 promoters (smCBA and hCx36sh)--AAV2 produced visible transduction, as seen in fundus images, only when the retina was altered by ganglion cell loss or enzymatic vitreolysis.ConclusionsThe results in the macaque suggest that intravitreal injection of AAV2 would produce high levels of gene expression at the human fovea, important in retinal gene therapy, but not in the central retina beyond the fovea.
| S-EPMC3088562 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The intravitreal (IVT) injection method is a choice when targeting the inner retina for gene therapy. However, the transduction efficiency of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors administered by the IVT route is usually low and may be affected by several factors. To improve the transduction efficiency, we developed a novel illuminated long-needle attached injection system and injected AAV2-CMV (cytomegalovirus)-EGFP in front of the retina in rabbit eyes. Ophthalmological examinations were performed and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humor were assessed at the baseline and 1 month, and the results were compared with those of the conventional injection method. Retinal tissues were used for immunohistochemistry. In the ophthalmological examinations, no significant inflammatory signs were detected in both groups, except for transient, mild hyperemia. In the tissues of the rabbits in the peripapillary injection group, significantly increased GFP expression was detected at the ganglion cell and the inner nuclear layers (p < 0.01). There were no differences between groups in glial activation and expressions of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8. These results suggest that peripapillary IVT injection in front of the retina would be safe and efficiently transduce viral vectors into the retina of large animals and is considered as a potential method for use in clinical trials.
| S-EPMC7152690 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10645462 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gene and drug delivery to the retina is a critical therapeutic goal. While the majority of inherited forms of retinal degeneration affect the outer retina, specifically the photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium, effective targeted delivery to this region requires invasive subretinal delivery. Our goal in this work was to evaluate two innovative approaches for increasing both the persistence of delivered nanospheres and their penetration into the outer retina while using the much less invasive intravitreal delivery method. We formulated novel hyaluronic acid nanospheres (HA-NS, 250 nm and 500 nm in diameter) conjugated to fluorescent reporters and delivered them intravitreally to the adult Balb/C mouse retina. They exhibited persistence in the vitreous and along the inner limiting membrane (ILM) for up to 30 days (longest timepoint examined) but little retinal penetration. We thus evaluated the ability of the small molecule, sulfotyrosine, to disrupt the ILM, and found that 3.2 µg/µL sulfotyrosine led to significant improvement in delivery to the outer retina following intravitreal injections without causing retinal inflammation, degeneration, or loss of function. Co-delivery of sulfotyrosine and HA-NS led to robust improvements in penetration of HA-NS into the retina and accumulation along the interface between the photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium. These exciting findings suggest that sulfotyrosine and HA-NS may be an effective strategy for outer retinal targeting after intravitreal injection.
| S-EPMC8469555 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeRanibizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, and dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, have been shown to be effective in treating macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) (central RVO (CRVO) and branch RVO (BRVO)). Their real-world usage, however, has yet to be compared. We therefore evaluated ophthalmology visits for both drugs using US patient-level data.MethodsThe IMS Health Real-World Data Medical Claims database was used to identify treatment-naive patients receiving ranibizumab intravitreal injections or dexamethasone intravitreal implants between June 2010 and February 2014 who had 12 months of follow-up data. The primary outcome measure was the mean number of all ophthalmology visits for the two drugs in patients with CRVO and BRVO. Secondary outcome measures included a comparison of treatment visits, non-treatment visits, and time intervals between visits.ResultsOverall, 2822 patients received ranibizumab injections (CRVO, 1178; BRVO, 1644) and 365 received dexamethasone implants (CRVO, 191; BRVO, 174). The mean number (SD) of all ophthalmology visits was higher for patients receiving ranibizumab injections than for those receiving dexamethasone implants (CRVO: 7.2 (3.6) vs 6.2 (3.1), P<0.001; BRVO: 7.1 (3.4) vs 6.3 (3.1), P=0.016).ConclusionsPatients with RVO receiving ranibizumab injections had a mean of approximately one more visit to their ophthalmologist in the first 12 months of treatment than those treated with dexamethasone implants. The visit burden is therefore not substantially different and physicians should focus on the clinical benefits of these drugs when evaluating treatment options for RVO.
| S-EPMC5395996 | biostudies-literature