Dataset Information

(18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: a longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: (18)F-FDG PET is a widely used tool for molecular imaging of oncological, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders. We evaluated (18)F-FDG microPET as an implant osteomyelitis imaging tool using a Staphylococcus aureus-induced peroperative implant infection in rabbits. METHODS: Intramedullary titanium nails were implanted in contaminated and uncontaminated (control) proximal right tibiae of rabbits. Tibiae were quantitatively assessed with microPET for (18)F-FDG uptake before and sequentially at 1, 3, and 6 weeks after surgery. Tracer uptake was assessed in soft tissue and bone in both treatment groups with an additional comparison between the operated and unoperated limb. MicroPET analysis was combined with radiographic assessment and complementary histology of the tibiae. RESULTS: At the first postoperative week, the (18)F-FDG uptake in the contaminated implant group was significantly higher than the preoperative measurement, without a significant difference between the contaminated and uncontaminated tibiae. From the third postoperative week onward, (18)F-FDG uptake allowed discrimination between osteomyelitis and postoperative aseptic bone healing, as well as quantification of the infection at distinct locations around the implant. INTERPRETATION: (18)F-FDG-based microPET imaging allows differentiation between deep infection and undisturbed wound healing after implantation of a titanium intramedullary nail in this rabbit model. Furthermore, our results indicate that (18)F-FDG PET may provide a tool in human clinical diagnostics and for the evaluation of antimicrobial strategies in animal models of orthopedic implant infection.

SUBMITTER: Odekerken JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4062800 | biostudies-other | 2014 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

(18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: a longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia.

Odekerken Jim C E JC Brans Boudewijn T BT Welting Tim J M TJ Walenkamp Geert H I M GH

Acta orthopaedica 20140327 3

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>(18)F-FDG PET is a widely used tool for molecular imaging of oncological, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders. We evaluated (18)F-FDG microPET as an implant osteomyelitis imaging tool using a Staphylococcus aureus-induced peroperative implant infection in rabbits.<h4>Methods</h4>Intramedullary titanium nails were implanted in contaminated and uncontaminated (control) proximal right tibiae of rabbits. Tibiae were quantitatively assessed with microPET for (18) ...[more]

PMID: 24673540

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAseptic loosening (AL) of hip prosthesis presents inflammation and pain as sign and symptom similarly to arthritis pathologies. Still, the immune and innervation profiles in hip AL remain unclear and their interplay is poorly explored. Herein, local tissue inflammatory response, sensory and sympathetic innervation as well as associated local mediators were assessed in hip joint microenvironment underlying AL and compared to osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsHistopathological analysis, immune cells (macrophages, T, B cells and PMNs) as well as sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers (SP(+), CGRP(+), TH(+)) distribution and profiles were analyzed on tissues retrieved from patients with failed hip prostheses due to AL (n = 20) and hip OA (n = 15) by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, transcriptional levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12a, iNOS), anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10), osteoclastic factor (RANKL) and bone remodeling factor (TGF-β1) were locally evaluated by qRT-PCR. Serum TGF-β1 levels were assessed preoperatively by ELISA.ResultsHistopathological analysis revealed that tissues, aseptic interface membranes of AL patients had distinct tissue architecture and immune cells profile when compared to OA synovial tissues. Macrophages, T cells and B cells showed significant differences in tissue distribution. In OA, inflammation is mostly confined to the vicinity of synovial membrane while in AL macrophages infiltrated throughout the tissue. This differential immune profile is also accompanied with a distinct pattern of sensory and sympathetic innervation. Importantly, in AL patients, a lack of sympathetic innervation aseptic interface membranes without compensation mechanisms at cellular levels was observed with simultaneous reorganization of sensorial innervation. Despite the different histopathological portrait, AL and OA patients exhibited similar transcriptional levels of genes encoding key proteins in local immune response. Nevertheless, in both pathologies, TGF-β1 expression was prominent in sites where the inflammation is occurring. However, at systemic level no differences were found.ConclusionThese findings indicate that AL patients exhibit different local inflammatory response and innervation signatures from OA patients in hip joint. These insights shed the light on neuro-immune interplay in AL and highlight the need to better understand this crosstalk to unravel potential mechanisms for targeted-therapies to improve hip joint lifetime and treatment.

Dataset Information

(18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: a longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia.

Publications

(18)F-FDG microPET imaging differentiates between septic and aseptic wound healing after orthopedic implant placement: a longitudinal study of an implant osteomyelitis in the rabbit tibia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets