Dataset Information

A comparison of surfactant administration through i-gel and ET-tube in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in newborns weighing more than 2000 grams.

ABSTRACT: Surfactant administration together with nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) administration is considered to be the basis for Newborn's Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) management. This study evaluated the method of directing the surfactant to the lungs in newborns affiliated with RDS through i-gel (i-gel surfactant administration/i-gelSA) compared to the standard care INSURE method, in a clinical trial.This randomized control trial (RCT) was done on newborns weighing ?2000 g, with RDS, while being supported with Bubble-CPAP. Newborns, which required FiO2 ?0.3 under Continuous Distending Pressure (CDP) ?5 cm H2O for more than 30 minutes to maintain SpO2 in the range of 89 - 95%, were given 100 mg/kg of Survanta. In the interventional group or the i-gelSA (i-gel Surfactant Administration) group, 35 newborns experienced surfactant administration with i-gel and 35 newborns in the control or INSURE group. The average a/APO2 before and after surfactant administration, repeated need for surfactant administration, average nCPAP duration, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, and the average duration of hospitalization in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) were compared.Although the average a/APO2 showed no significant difference before the procedure; in the i-gelSA group, this average was meaningfully higher after the administration of the surfactant (P = 0.001). The other factors showed no significant difference.According to the results of this study, the surfactant administration using i-gel was more successful in oxygenation improvement than the INSURE method, and the i-gel method could even be promoted to the standard care position. However, more research is needed in this area.

SUBMITTER: Sadeghnia A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4162081 | biostudies-other | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comparison of surfactant administration through i-gel and ET-tube in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in newborns weighing more than 2000 grams.

Sadeghnia Alireza A Tanhaei Mozhgan M Mohammadizadeh Majid M Nemati Mohammad M

Advanced biomedical research 20140731

<h4>Background</h4>Surfactant administration together with nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) administration is considered to be the basis for Newborn's Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) management. This study evaluated the method of directing the surfactant to the lungs in newborns affiliated with RDS through i-gel (i-gel surfactant administration/i-gelSA) compared to the standard care INSURE method, in a clinical trial.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This randomized control tria ...[more]

PMID: 25221763

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background/Aims: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) was recommended as the initial respiratory support for spontaneous breathing in infants with very low birth weight and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) have been reported to reduce the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). This study aimed to explore the applicability of minimally invasive surfactant administration (MISA) in China. Materials and Methods: MISA was a randomized controlled study conducted at eight level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in China. Spontaneously breathing infants born at 25+0 to 31+6 weeks' gestation who progressively developed respiratory distress during the first 6 h after birth were randomly assigned to receive MISA or endotracheal intubation surfactant administration (EISA). The primary outcome was the difference in the morbidity of BPD between two groups of infants with MISA and EISA at 36 weeks corrected gestational age. Results: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the 151 infants in the MISA group were similar to the 147 infants in the EISA group. The comparison showed no clear benefits in the MISA group in the incidence of BPD, while infants from the EISA group had higher rates of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) (60.5 vs. 41.1%, p = 0.001). The duration of surfactant infusion and the total time of surfactant administration in the MISA group were significantly longer than in the EISA group. A slightly increased heart rate was noted 1 h post surfactant administration in the EISA group. In subgroup analysis, the comparison of 51 smaller (<30 weeks) preterm infants, named MISAs (n = 31) and EISAs (n = 20), showed a significant reduction of BPD (29.0 vs. 70.0%, p = 0.004) and PDA (29.0 vs. 65.0%, p = 0.011). In the subgroup analysis of blood gas, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) value at 1 and 12 h and partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) at 12 h were all higher in the EISA group compared to the MISA group. Conclusion: MISA had no clear benefit on the incidence of BPD, but it was related to a reduction in PDA. It is an appropriate therapy for spontaneous breathing in infants with extremely low birth weight and NRDS.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Surfactant is usually deficiency in adult acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) patients and surfactant administration may be a useful therapy. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the effect of surfactant administration on outcomes of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS:PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane database, Elsevier, Web of Science and http://clinicaltrials.gov were searched and investigated until December 2017. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing surfactant administration with general therapy in adult patients with ARDS were enrolled. The primary outcome was mortality (7-10-day, 28-30-day and 90-180-day). Secondary outcome included oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio). Demographic variables, surfactant administration, and outcomes were retrieved. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the impact of study quality issues on the overall effect. Funnel plot inspection, Egger's and Begger's test were applied to investigate the publication bias. Internal validity was assessed with the risk of bias tool. Random errors were evaluated with trial sequential analysis(TSA). Quality levels were assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology(GRADE). RESULTS:Eleven RCTs with 3038 patients were identified. Surfactant administration could not improve mortality of adult patients [Risk ratio (RR) (95%CI))?=?1.02(0.93-1.12), p?=?0.65]. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference of 7-10-day mortality [RR(95%CI))?=?0.89(0.54-1.49), p?=?0.66], 28-30-day mortality[RR(95%CI)?=?1.00(0.89-1.12), p?=?0.98] and 90-180-day mortality [RR(95%CI)?=?1.11(0.94-1.32), p?=?0.22] between surfactant group and control group. The change of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in adult ARDS patients had no difference [MD(95%CI)?=?0.06(-?0.12-0.24), p?=?0.5] after surfactant administration. Finally, TSA and GRADE indicated lack of firm evidence for a beneficial effect. CONCLUSIONS:Surfactant administration has not been shown to improve mortality and improve oxygenation for adult ARDS patients. Large rigorous randomized trials are needed to explore the effect of surfactant to adult ARDS patients.

Project description:BackgroundLess invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is a way of giving surfactant without endotracheal intubation and has shown to be promising in reducing the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. However, the mechanism underlying its beneficial effect and variations in the technique of administration may prevent its widespread use. This trial aims to evaluate the effects of two methods of surfactant administration, LISA or endotracheal surfactant administration followed by low peak pressure (LPPSA) ventilation, in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).MethodsThe LISA Or Low Peak Pressure trial is to be conducted in 14 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in China. A total of 600 preterm infants born with gestational age between 250/7 and 316/7 weeks and with a primary diagnosis of RDS will be involved in the study. Infants will be randomized to the LISA or LPPSA group when surfactant therapy is indicated. Primary outcomes include mortality, severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA), and mechanical ventilation (MV) in the first 72 h of life. Secondary outcomes include the days of MV, duration of all sorts of non-invasive respiratory support, fraction of inspired oxygen, oxygen saturation before and after surfactant administration, and time required to perform the procedure for surfactant administration. The incidence of comorbidities, including retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA), pneumothorax, and massive pulmonary hemorrhage within 48 h of surfactant administration, and the failure rates of each technique will be determined.DiscussionData from recent systematic review and meta-analysis have suggested a possible improvement in outcomes of preterm infants with RDS by the LISA technique. However, robust evidence is lacking. Why LISA plays a potential role in reducing respiratory morbidity, mainly BPD in preterm infants, remains unclear. The possible explanations are the active and uninterrupted delivery of continuous positive airway pressure during the LISA procedure and the avoidance of complications caused by intubation and relatively high pressure/volume ventilation following surfactant administration. We hypothesized that LISA's effectiveness lies mainly in avoiding relatively high-pressure positive ventilation immediately following surfactant administration. Thus, this multicenter randomized controlled trial will focus on issues of endotracheal intubation and the pressure/volume used during conventional surfactant administration. The effectiveness, safety and comorbidities of preterm infants following LISA or LPPSA will be evaluated.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900020970. Registered on 23 January 2019.

Dataset Information

A comparison of surfactant administration through i-gel and ET-tube in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in newborns weighing more than 2000 grams.

Publications

A comparison of surfactant administration through i-gel and ET-tube in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in newborns weighing more than 2000 grams.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets