Dataset Information

Angina Relief by Ranolazine Identifies False-Negative SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Scans in Patients with Coronary Disease Demonstrated by Coronary Angiography.

ABSTRACT: Normal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) reduces intermediate- or high-risk pretest probability patients to low- or intermediate-risk posttest probability, respectively, for coronary disease (CD). Since ranolazine (RAN) relieves only angina, anginal patients with normal MPI whose angina is relieved by RAN present a significant dilemma. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to confirm the impression that coronary angiography (CA) is indicated in patients whose class 3 to 4 angina is relieved by RAN, but have normal myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPIs. Charts of patients with stable class 3 to 4 angina (typical and atypical) and normal MPIs (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥50% and segmental score = 0) were reviewed. CA was done on all the patients with complete angina relief taking RAN, as well as nonresponders whose anginal etiology could not be explained. Stenoses were considered flow-restrictive when more than 70% diameter stenosis is observed by quantitative CA, or, when 50 to 70%, fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured ≤0.80. RAN relieved angina in 36 of 54 (67%) patients. Of the known cases, 25 of these 36 (69%) had 43 stenoses ≥50% (mean = 66%): 15 (60%) had 1 vessel disease; 9 (36%) had multivessel disease; 18 (72%) had left anterior descending (LAD) disease; 1 (4%) had left main disease. Twenty one of 43 (49%) stenosis were > 70%; 22 (51%) stenoses were 50 to 70% and required FFR measurement. Twenty nine of 43 stenoses (67%) were considered flow-restrictive in 18 of these 25 (72%) patients. Eight RAN nonresponders with no explanation for angina had no CD at CA. RAN angina relief is invaluable in identifying falsely negative SPECT MPI, and 50% of these patients have flow-restrictive stenoses.

SUBMITTER: Murray GL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4169097 | biostudies-other | 2014 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of stress myocardial computed tomography (CT) perfusion with that of stress myocardial magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and Methods All patients gave written informed consent prior to inclusion in this institutional review board-approved study. This two-center substudy of the prospective Combined Noninvasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320-Detector Row Computed Tomography (CORE320) multicenter trial included 92 patients (mean age, 63.1 years ± 8.1 [standard deviation]; 73% male). All patients underwent perfusion CT and perfusion MR imaging with either adenosine or regadenoson stress. The predefined reference standards were combined quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and single-photon emission CT (SPECT) or QCA alone. Results from coronary CT angiography were not included, and diagnostic performance was evaluated with the Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by disease status. Results The prevalence of CAD was 39% (36 of 92) according to QCA and SPECT and 64% (59 of 92) according to QCA alone. When compared with QCA and SPECT, per-patient diagnostic accuracy of perfusion CT and perfusion MR imaging was 63% (58 of 92) and 75% (69 of 92), respectively (P = .11); sensitivity was 92% (33 of 36) and 83% (30 of 36), respectively (P = .45); and specificity was 45% (25 of 56) and 70% (39 of 56), respectively (P < .01). When compared with QCA alone, diagnostic accuracy of CT perfusion and MR perfusion imaging was 82% (75 of 92) and 74% (68 of 92), respectively (P = .27); sensitivity was 90% (53 of 59) and 69% (41 of 59), respectively (P < .01); and specificity was 67% (22 of 33) and 82% (27 of 33), respectively (P = .27). Conclusion This multicenter study shows that the diagnostic performance of perfusion CT is similar to that of perfusion MR imaging in the detection of CAD. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:PurposeTo determine the impact of low tube voltage coronary CT angiography on detection of subclinical atherosclerosis.Materials and methodsRetrospective sampling of an emergency department coronary CT angiography registry was performed. All patients in the registry underwent a noncontrast coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring scan at 120 kV before coronary CT angiography. The study sample (n = 264) constituted patients with subclinical atherosclerosis (Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System™ [CAD-RADS] 1 or 2) randomly mixed one-to-one with patients without atherosclerosis (CAD-RADS 0). The patients with coronary CT angiography performed at 70-90 kV were considered the low tube voltage group (n = 159) and patients with coronary CT angiography performed at 100-120 kV were considered the standard tube voltage group (n = 105). The number of coronary plaques and overall CAD-RADS classification (per patient) were evaluated twice: initially, by reading coronary CT angiography alone, and then, by coronary CT angiography in combination with a CAC scan. Considering the combined reading (CT angiography plus CAC scan) as the reference standard, the performance of coronary CT angiography alone was assessed for plaque detection and appropriate CAD-RADS (per patient) classification. The comparisons were made between the low tube voltage and standard tube voltage groups by using a Fisher exact test and χ2 test for proportions and a Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test for means.ResultsIn total, 455 plaques were identified in 118 patients (70 of 159 patients in the low tube voltage group; 48 of 105 in the standard tube voltage group). When reading coronary CT angiographic images alone, 97 of 455 (21%) plaques were missed that led to an incorrect CAD-RADS classification in 16 of 264 (6%) studies (interpreted as CAD-RADS 0 instead of CAD-RADS 1 or 2). Missed plaques were significantly more frequent in the low tube voltage group versus the standard tube voltage group (41% [85 of 206] vs 5% [12 of 249], respectively; P < .001). Incorrect CAD-RADS classification was also seen more commonly in the low tube voltage group (8.8% [14 of 159] vs 2% [two of 105]; P = .01), typically at low plaque burden (median CAC score, 1; range, 1-4). Calcified plaques that appeared isodense to luminal contrast material attenuation were seen more frequently in the low tube voltage group compared with the standard tube voltage group (20% [32 of 159] vs 7.6% [eight of 105], respectively; P = .005).ConclusionCoronary artery plaques may be missed at low tube voltage coronary CT angiographic examination performed without a concomitant CAC scan.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.See also the commentary by Truong in this issue.

Dataset Information

Angina Relief by Ranolazine Identifies False-Negative SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Scans in Patients with Coronary Disease Demonstrated by Coronary Angiography.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets