Dataset Information

Impact of treatment site in adolescents and young adults with central nervous system tumors.

ABSTRACT: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; aged 15-39 years) have inferior survival in comparison with younger (aged 0-14 years) cancer patients. Impact of care at specialized centers such as National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCICCC) for AYAs of all ages or the Children's Oncology Group (COG) for AYAs aged 15 to 21 years with central nervous system (CNS) tumors remains unstudied.We constructed a cohort of 560 children and 784 AYAs with CNS tumors reported to the Los Angeles cancer registry from 1998 to 2008. Cox and logistic regression models were used, with two-sided P values from Wald ?(2) tests.In Cox regression analysis restricted to World Health Organization (WHO) grade II tumors, patients of all ages saw worse outcome if not treated at NCICCC/COG sites (non-NCICCC/COG vs NCICCC/COG: hazard ratio [HR] =1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09 to 2.72). Furthermore, the worse outcome for AYAs compared with children (HR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.98; P = .005) was abrogated (HR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.79 to 2.29; P = .27) by care at NCICCC/COGs. Those less likely to receive care at NCICCC/COG sites included young AYAs (aged 15-21 years vs children: odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.48; P < .001) and older AYAs (aged 22-39 years) with low socioeconomic status (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.89; P = .02), public/no insurance (OR = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.71; P < .01), and distance to care greater than 5 miles (OR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.57; P < .001).Population-based data reveal that care at NCICCC/COG sites mitigates inferior outcome in AYAs with WHO grade II CNS tumors compared with children. Compared with children, AYAs are less likely to receive care at NCICCC/COGs. Insurance, socioeconomic status, and distance serve as barriers to care at NCICCCs for older AYAs.

SUBMITTER: Wolfson J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4207868 | biostudies-other | 2014 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of treatment site in adolescents and young adults with central nervous system tumors.

Wolfson Julie J Sun Can-Lan CL Kang Tongjun T Wyatt Laura L D'Appuzzo Massimo M Bhatia Smita S

Journal of the National Cancer Institute 20140801 8

<h4>Background</h4>Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; aged 15-39 years) have inferior survival in comparison with younger (aged 0-14 years) cancer patients. Impact of care at specialized centers such as National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCICCC) for AYAs of all ages or the Children's Oncology Group (COG) for AYAs aged 15 to 21 years with central nervous system (CNS) tumors remains unstudied.<h4>Methods</h4>We constructed a cohort of 560 children and 784 AYAs with ...[more]

PMID: 25178694

Similar Datasets

Project description:Overall, tumors of primary central nervous system (CNS) are quite common in adults with an incidence rate close to 30 new cases/100,000 inhabitants per year. Significant clinical and biological advances have been accomplished in the most common adult primary CNS tumors (i.e., diffuse gliomas). However, most CNS tumor subtypes are rare with an incidence rate below the threshold defining rare disease of 6.0 new cases/100,000 inhabitants per year. Close to 150 entities of primary CNS tumors have now been identified by the novel integrated histomolecular classification published by the World Health Organization (WHO) and its updates by the c-IMPACT NOW consortium (the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy). While these entities can be better classified into smaller groups either by their histomolecular features and/or by their location, assessing their treatment by clinical trials and improving the survival of patients remain challenging. Despite these tumors are rare, research, and advances remain slower compared to diffuse gliomas for instance. In some cases (i.e., ependymoma, medulloblastoma) the understanding is high because single or few driver mutations have been defined. The European Union has launched European Reference Networks (ERNs) dedicated to support advances on the clinical side of rare diseases including rare cancers. The ERN for rare solid adult tumors is termed EURACAN. Within EURACAN, Domain 10 brings together the European patient advocacy groups (ePAGs) and physicians dedicated to improving outcomes in rare primary CNS tumors and also aims at supporting research, care and teaching in the field. In this review, we discuss the relevant biological and clinical characteristics, clinical management of patients, and research directions for the following types of rare primary CNS tumors: medulloblastoma, pineal region tumors, glioneuronal and rare glial tumors, ependymal tumors, grade III meningioma and mesenchymal tumors, primary central nervous system lymphoma, germ cell tumors, spinal cord tumors and rare pituitary tumors.

Project description:Abstract Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized clinical management of malignancies by generating long-term, durable control of tumors. Unfortunately, these therapies often cause serious immune-related adverse events. In addition, only a small percentage of solid tumors respond to these therapies and there is little efficacy in CNS tumors. Our research is focused on the CD200 immune checkpoint, which modulates the immune system through the inhibitory receptor (CD200R1) and activation receptors (CD200AR). We demonstrated that targeting the CD200AR with a checkpoint peptide ligand (CD200AR-L) activates the immune system and renders it impervious to the inhibitory effects of CD200. In a pre-clinical canine spontaneous high-grade glioma trial, CD200AR-L, with autologous tumor lysate vaccination, resulted in a 20% two-year progression-free survival; no toxicities or adverse effects were observed. We suggest this result was due to the ability of the CD200AR-L to modulate multiple immune checkpoints. During the characterization of the CD200AR-L, we discovered signaling molecules are shared by the CD200 and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint pathways, suggesting these immune checkpoints are connected. Our preliminary studies demonstrated that the inhibitory CD200R1 and PD-1 mediate immune checkpoint signaling activities through the SHIP1/2. Moreover, CD200AR-L overpowers the suppressive effects of CD200 and PD-L1, which are both shed by tumors, by downregulating the inhibitory CD200R1 and PD-1 on both antigen-presenting cells (APC) and T-cells. In addition, CD200AR-L downregulates PD-1 on APCs and inhibits the upregulation of PD-L1 and CTLA4. These studies led to the discovery that the novel peptide modulates the CD200, PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways, providing the basis for the translatable development of a CD200-directed peptide for clinical use against multiple tumors including gliomas. These studies led to FDA approval of this peptide for the first in human phase I single center, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial (NCT04642937) in adult and pediatric trial for children with recurrent malignant brain tumors.

Dataset Information

Impact of treatment site in adolescents and young adults with central nervous system tumors.

Publications

Impact of treatment site in adolescents and young adults with central nervous system tumors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets