Dataset Information

L4 and L5 spondylectomy for en bloc resection of giant cell tumor and review of the literature.

ABSTRACT: Study Design?Case report and review of the literature. Objective?We present the case of a two-level lumbar spondylectomy at L4 and L5 for en bloc resection of a giant cell tumor (GCT) and lumbopelvic reconstruction. Methods?A 58-year-old woman presented with a 7-month history of progressive intractable back and leg pain secondary to a biopsy-proven Enneking stage III GCT of the L4 and L5 vertebrae. The patient underwent a successful L4-L5 spondylectomy and lumbopelvic reconstruction using a combined posterior and anterior approach over two operative stages. Results?Postoperative complications included a deep wound infection and a cerebrospinal fluid leak; however, following surgical debridement and long-term antibiotic treatment, the patient was neurologically intact with minimal pain and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence or instrumentation failure at more than 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion?Spondylectomy that achieves en bloc resection is a viable and effective treatment option that can be curative for Enneking stage III GCTs involving the lower lumbar spine. The lumbosacral junction represents a challenging anatomic location for spinal reconstruction after spondylectomy with unique technical considerations.

SUBMITTER: Santiago-Dieppa DR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4212699 | biostudies-other | 2014 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

L4 and L5 spondylectomy for en bloc resection of giant cell tumor and review of the literature.

Santiago-Dieppa David R DR Hwang Lee S LS Bydon Ali A Gokaslan Ziya L ZL McCarthy Edward F EF Witham Timothy F TF

Evidence-based spine-care journal 20141001 2

Study Design Case report and review of the literature. Objective We present the case of a two-level lumbar spondylectomy at L4 and L5 for en bloc resection of a giant cell tumor (GCT) and lumbopelvic reconstruction. Methods A 58-year-old woman presented with a 7-month history of progressive intractable back and leg pain secondary to a biopsy-proven Enneking stage III GCT of the L4 and L5 vertebrae. The patient underwent a successful L4-L5 spondylectomy and lumbopelvic reconstruction using a comb ...[more]

PMID: 25364329

Similar Datasets

Project description:This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate the existing evidence regarding the comparison between en-bloc resection surgery and debulking surgery for spinal tumors, including both primary and metastatic tumors. The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, Web of Science, Scopus, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Database (VIP), and Wan Fang Database was carried out and included all studies that directly compared en-bloc resection surgery with debulking surgery for spinal tumors in patients through March 2024. The primary outcomes included recurrence rate, postoperative metastasis rate, mortality rate, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), complication, and so on. The statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3. We systematically reviewed 868 articles and included 27 studies involving 1135 patients who underwent either en-bloc resection surgery (37.89%) or debulking surgery (62.11%). Our meta-analysis demonstrated significant advantages of en-bloc resection over debulking surgery. Specifically, the en-bloc resection group had a lower recurrence rate (OR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.13-0.28, P < 0.00001), lower postoperative metastasis rate (P = 0.002), and lower mortality rate (P < 0.00001). Additionally, en-bloc resection could improve OS and RFS (HR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.32-0.62, P < 0.00001 and HR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.17-0.80, P = 0.01, respectively). However, en-bloc resection required longer operative times and was associated with a higher overall complication rate compared to debulking surgery (P = 0.0005 and P < 0.00001, respectively). The current evidence indicates that en-bloc surgical resection can effectively control tumor recurrence and mortality, as well as improve RFS and OS for patients with spinal tumors. However, it is crucial not to overlook the potential risks of perioperative complications. Ultimately, these findings should undergo additional validation through multi-center, double-blind, and large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Project description:ObjectiveThe wrist is the second most commonly involved location for GCTB, while distal ulna is a relatively rare location and limited evidence exists on which surgical approaches and reconstruction techniques are optimal. We carried out a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the recurrence rate of distal ulna GCTB and the long-term functional outcomes of different surgery options.MethodsAll 28 patients received surgical treatment for distal ulna GCTB in one of three tertiary bone tumor centers between May 2007 and January 2021 with a minimum two-year follow-up. Surgical options included intralesional curettage or en bloc resection (one of 3 types). Functional outcomes were assessed by the MSTS score, the QuickDASH instrument, MWS, and MHQ according to the latest treatment.ResultsOverall recurrence rate was 14.2%. The curettage group (N = 7) had a significantly higher recurrence rate compared to en bloc resection (N = 21) (42.9% vs 4.8%) (mean follow-up: 88.8 mo). Seven patients received the Darrach procedure, 5 received the original Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, and 9 received the modified Sauvé-Kapandji procedure with extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tenodesis. Of the 4 patients having a recurrence, 1 received the Darrach EBR, 2 received the modified Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, and 1 received resection for soft tissue recurrence. Only MWS and esthetics in the MHQ scores were different (curettage, Darrach, Sauvé-Kapandji, and Sauvé-Kapandji with ECU tenodesis [MWS: 96.5 ± 1.3 vs 91.5 ± 4.7 vs 90.8 ± 2.8 vs 91.5 ± 3.6; esthetics in MHQ: 98.5 ± 3.1 vs 89.9 ± 4.7 vs 93.8 ± 4.4 vs 92.6 ± 3.8], respectively).ConclusionsEn bloc resection for distal ulna GCTB had a significantly lower recurrence rate compared with curettage and achieved favorable functional outcome scores. Given the higher recurrence rate after curettage, patients should be well informed of the potential benefits and risks of selecting the distal radioulnar joint-preserving procedure. Moreover, reconstructions after tumor resection of the ulna head do not appear to be necessary.

Project description:IntroductionTomita En-bloc spondylectomy of L5 is one of the most challenging techniques in radical oncological spine surgery. A 42-year-old female was referred with lower back pain and L5 radiculopathy with a background of right shoulder liposarcoma excision. CT-PET confirmed a solitary L5 oligometastasis. MRI showed thecal sac indentation hence wasn't suitable for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) alone. The seeding nature of sarcoma prevents the indication of separation surgery hence excisional surgery is considered for radical curative treatment. This case report demonstrates dual-staged modified TES including the utilisation of novel techniques to allow for maximum radical oncological control in the era of SABR and lesser invasive surgery.MethodsFirst-stage: Carbonfibre pedicle screws planned from L2 to S2AI-Pelvis, aligned, to her patient-specific rods. Radiofrequency ablation of L5 pedicles prior to osteotomy was performed to prevent sarcoma cell seeding. Microscope-assisted thecal sac tumour separation and L5 nerve root dissection was performed. Novel surgical navigation of the ultrasonic bone-cutter assisted inferior L4 and superior S1 endplate osteotomies. Second-stage: Vascular-assisted retroperitoneal approach at L4-S1 was undertaken protecting the great vessels. Completion of osteotomies at L4 and S1 to En-bloc L5: (L4 inferior endplate, L4/5 disc, L5 body, L5/S1 disc and S1 superior endplate). Anterior reconstruction used an expandable PEEK cage obviating the need for a third posterior stage. Reinforced with a patient-specific carbon plate L4-S1 promontory.ResultsPatient rehabilitated well and was discharged after 42 days. Cyberknife of 30Gy in 5 fractions was delivered two months post-op. Despite left foot drop, she's walking independently 9 months post-op.ConclusionThese are challenging cases require a truly multi-disciplinary team approach. We share this technique for a dual stage TES and metal-free construct with post adjuvant SABR to achieve maximum local control in spinal oligometastatic disease. This case promotes our modified TES technique in the era of SABR and separation surgery in carefully selected cases.

Dataset Information

L4 and L5 spondylectomy for en bloc resection of giant cell tumor and review of the literature.

Publications

L4 and L5 spondylectomy for en bloc resection of giant cell tumor and review of the literature.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets