Dataset Information

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis after a hepatic resection: patterns of care among liver surgeons.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: No consensus exists for post-hepatectomy venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis. Factors impacting VTE prophylaxis patterns among hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons were defined. METHOD: Surgeons were invited to complete a web-based survey on VTE prophylaxis. The impact of physician and clinical factors was analysed. RESULTS: Two hundred responses were received. Most respondents were male (91%) and practiced at academic centres (88%) in the United States (80%). Surgical training varied: HPB (24%), transplantation (24%), surgical oncology (34%), HPB/transplantation (13%), or no specialty (5%). Respondents estimated VTE risk was higher after major (6%) versus minor (3%) resections. Although 98% use VTE prophylaxis, there was considerable variability: sequential compression devices (SCD) (91%), unfractionated heparin Q12h (31%) and Q8h (32%), and low-molecular weight heparin (39%). While 88% noted VTE prophylaxis was not impacted by operative indication, 16% stated major resections reduced their VTE prophylaxis. Factors associated with the decreased use of pharmacologic prophylaxis included: elevated international normalized ratio (INR) (74%), thrombocytopaenia (63%), liver insufficiency (58%), large EBL (46%) and complications (8%). Forty-seven per cent of respondents wait until ?post-operative day 1 (POD1) and 35% hold pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis until no signs of coagulopathy. A minority (14%) discharge patients on pharmacologic prophylaxis. While 81% have institutional VTE guidelines, 79% believe hepatectomy-specific guidelines would be helpful. CONCLUSION: There is considerable variation regarding VTE prophylaxis among liver surgeons. While most HPB surgeons employ VTE prophylaxis, the methods, timing and purported contraindications differ significantly.

SUBMITTER: Weiss MJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4238855 | biostudies-other | 2014 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis after a hepatic resection: patterns of care among liver surgeons.

Weiss Matthew J MJ Kim Yuhree Y Ejaz Aslam A Spolverato Gaya G Haut Elliott R ER Hirose Kenzo K Wolfgang Christopher L CL Choti Michael A MA Pawlik Timothy M TM

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 20140528 10

<h4>Introduction</h4>No consensus exists for post-hepatectomy venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis. Factors impacting VTE prophylaxis patterns among hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons were defined.<h4>Method</h4>Surgeons were invited to complete a web-based survey on VTE prophylaxis. The impact of physician and clinical factors was analysed.<h4>Results</h4>Two hundred responses were received. Most respondents were male (91%) and practiced at academic centres (88%) in the United States (8 ...[more]

PMID: 24888461

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSurgical prophylaxis for venous thrombo-embolic disease (VTE) includes risk assessment, chemical prophylaxis and mechanical prophylaxis (graduated compression stockings [GCS] and/or intermittent pneumatic compression devices [IPCD]). Although there is overwhelming evidence for the need and efficacy of VTE prophylaxis in patients at risk, only about a third of those who are at risk of VTE receive appropriate prophylaxis.ObjectiveThere is debate as to the best combination of VTE prophylaxis following abdominal surgery due to lack of evidence. The aim of this survey was to understand this gap between knowledge and practice.MethodsIn 2019 and 2020, a survey was conducted to investigate the current practice of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for major abdominal surgery, with a focus on colorectal resections. The study received ethics approval and involved distributing an 11-item questionnaire to members of two professional surgical societies: the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) and the General Surgeons Australia (GSA).ResultsFrom 214 surgeons: 100% use chemical prophylaxis, 68% do not use a risk assessment tool, 27% do not vary practice according to patient risk factors while > 90% use all three forms of VTE prophylaxis at some stage of treatment. Most surgeons do not vary practice between laparoscopic and open colectomy/major abdominal surgery and only 33% prescribe post-discharge chemical prophylaxis. 42% of surgeons surveyed had equipoise for a clinical trial on the use of IPCDs and the vast majority (> 95%) feel that IPCDs should provide at least a 2% improvement in VTE event rate in order to justify their routine use.ConclusionMost surgeons in Australia and New Zealand do not use risk assessment tools and use all three forms of prophylaxis regardless. Therfore there is a gap between practice and VTE prophylaxis for the use of mechanical prophylaxis options. Further research is required to determine whether dual modality mechanical prophylaxis is incrementally efficacious. Trial Registration- Not Applicable.

Project description:BackgroundDespite curative hepatectomy, most colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients relapse locally within 2 years. Genomic predictors for hepatic recurrence are poorly understood. This study was designed to identify genomic signatures for recurrence in resected CRLM patients treated with adjuvant hepatic artery infusion (HAI) and/or systemic (SYS) chemotherapy.MethodsPatients undergoing curative hepatectomy and adjuvant HAI+SYS or SYS between January 2000 and October 2017 with next-generation sequencing data were catalogued. Gene and signaling-level alterations were checked for association with time to any (AR), liver (LR), and extrahepatic recurrence (ER) by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsOf 172 receiving HAI+SYS, 100 patients recurred, with 69 LR and 83 ER. Five- and ten-year LR-free rates were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-65%) and 51% (95% CI 41-60%), respectively. Five- and 10-year ER-free, rates were 51% (95% CI 43-58%) and 45% (95% CI 36-54%), respectively. More ER was observed with tumors harboring altered KRAS (38% [95% CI 25-50%] vs. 63% [95% CI 53-71%], p-adj = 0.003) and RAS/RAF (36% [95% CI 25-48%] vs. 66% [95% CI 56-74%], p-adj < 0.001) than wild-type. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with worse AR (26% [95% CI 14-40%] vs. 48% [95% CI 39-57%], p-unadj < 0.001), ER (30% [95% CI 17-45%] vs. 62% [95% CI 53-70%], p-unadj < 0.001), and LR rate (40% [95% CI 24-57%] vs. 70% [95% CI 60-77%], p-unadj = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, controlling for clinical risk score, ablation, margin status, and primary T-stage, co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with increased risk for AR (HR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.38-3.31, p-unadj < 0.001), LR (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.06-3.02, p-unadj = 0.029), and ER (HR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.78-4.44, p-unadj < 0.001).ConclusionsAltered KRAS, RAS/RAF, and RAS/RAF-TP53 associated with earlier local and distant recurrence in resected CRLM patients receiving adjuvant HAI+SYS. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was a novel predictor of LR warranting investigation of whether genomic cooperativity is associated with this relapsing phenotype. Systemic therapies tailored to high-risk tumor biology are needed to reduce distant relapse after hepatectomy.

Project description:ImportanceThere is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among patients who undergo neurosurgical interventions for traumatic brain injury (TBI).ObjectiveTo measure the association between timing of VTE prophylaxis after urgent neurosurgical intervention for TBI and thromboembolic and intracranial complications.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study included adult patients (aged ≥16 years) who underwent urgent neurosurgical interventions (craniotomy/craniectomy or intracranial monitor/drain insertion within 24 hours after admission) for TBI at level 1 and 2 trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from January to August 2020.ExposuresTiming of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis initiation after urgent neurosurgical intervention (prophylaxis delay) measured in days (24-hour periods).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was VTE (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism). Secondary outcomes were repeated neurosurgery (neurosurgical reintervention after initiation of VTE prophylaxis) and mortality. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between prophylaxis delay and each outcome at the patient level and were adjusted for patient baseline and injury characteristics.ResultsThe study included 4951 patients (3676 [74%] male; median age, 50 years [IQR, 31-64 years]) who underwent urgent neurosurgical intervention for TBI at 304 trauma centers. The median prophylaxis delay was 3 days (IQR, 1-5 days). After adjustment for patient baseline and injury characteristics, prophylaxis delay was associated with increased odds of VTE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.08 per day; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12). Earlier initiation of prophylaxis was associated with increased risk of repeated neurosurgery. During the first 3 days, each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with a 28% decrease in odds of repeated neurosurgery (aOR, 0.72 per day; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88). After 3 days, each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with an additional 15% decrease in odds of repeated neurosurgery (aOR, 0.85 per day; 95% CI, 0.80-0.90). Earlier prophylaxis was associated with greater mortality among patients who initially underwent intracranial monitor/drain procedures, such that each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with decreased odds of death (aOR, 0.94 per day; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of patients who underwent urgent neurosurgical interventions for TBI, early pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was associated with reduced risk of thromboembolism. However, earlier initiation of prophylaxis was associated with increased risk of repeated neurosurgery. These findings suggest that although timely initiation of prophylaxis should be prioritized, caution should be used particularly during the first 3 days after the index procedure, when this risk appears to be highest.

Dataset Information

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis after a hepatic resection: patterns of care among liver surgeons.

Publications

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis after a hepatic resection: patterns of care among liver surgeons.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets