Care needs and clinical outcomes of older people with dementia: a population-based propensity score-matched cohort study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Hsiao FY
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4425532 | biostudies-other | 2015
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:In this population-based propensity score matched (PSM) cohort study, we aimed to investigate the risk of developing dementia with the use of acid suppressants, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2 antagonists). Cohorts of PPI users (n = 2,778), H2 antagonist users (n = 6,165), and non-users (n = 86,238) were selected from a dataset covering the years 2000 to 2010 in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients in the three groups were PSM at a ratio of 1:1 within each comparison cohort (CC). Three CCs were created: (1) PPI users compared to non-users (CC1, n = 2,583 pairs); (2) H2 antagonist users compared to non-users (CC2, n = 5,955 pairs); and (3) PPI users compared to H2 antagonist users (CC3, n = 2,765 pairs). A multivariable robust Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the risk of developing dementia. The multivariable analysis results show that the aHR of developing dementia during the follow-up period was 0.72 (CC1: 95% CI = 0.51-1.03, P = 0.07) for PPI users and 0.95 (CC2: 95% CI = 0.74-1.22, P = 0.69) for H2 antagonist users, when compared to non-users. Between the patients using acid suppressants, there was no difference between PPI and H2 antagonist users in the risk of developing dementia (CC3: aHR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.58-1.17, P = 0.28). In conclusion, no association was observed between the use of acid suppressants and the risk of developing dementia in any of the three CCs. Further, randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm this relationship.
| S-EPMC7703973 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWhether the route of anaesthesia is an independent risk factor for dementia remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a propensity score-matched (PSM) population-based cohort study to compare dementia incidence among surgical patients undergoing different routes of anaesthesia.MethodsThe inclusion criteria were being an inpatient >20 years of age who underwent major elective surgery, defined as those requiring GA without or with inhalation anaesthetics or regional anaesthesia, and being hospitalised for >1 day between Jan 1, 2008 and Dec 31, 2019 in Taiwan. Patients undergoing major elective surgery were categorised into three groups according to the type of anaesthesia administered: noninhalation anaesthesia, inhalation anaesthesia, and regional anaesthesia, matched at a 1:1 ratio. The incidence rate (IR) of dementia was determined.FindingsPSM yielded 63,750 patients (21,250 in the noninhalation anaesthesia group, 21,250 in the inhalation anaesthesia group, and 21,250 in the regional anaesthesia group). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; 95% confidence intervals) of dementia for the inhalation and noninhalation anaesthesia groups compared with the regional anaesthesia group were 20.16 (15.40-26.35; p < 0.001) and 18.33 (14.03-24.04; p < 0.001), respectively. The aHR of dementia for inhalation anaesthesia compared with noninhalation anaesthesia was 1.13 (1.03-1.22; p = 0.028). The IRs of dementia for the inhalation, noninhalation, and regional anaesthesia groups were 3647.90, 3492.00, and 272.99 per 100,000 person-years, respectively.InterpretationIn this population based cohort study, the incidence of dementia among surgical patients undergoing general anaesthesia was higher than among those undergoing regional anaesthesia. Among patients undergoing general anaesthesia, inhalation anaesthesia was associated with a higher risk of dementia than noninhalation anaesthesia. Our results should be confirmed in a randomised controlled trial.FundingThe study was partially supported by Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital (Funding Number: 10908, 10909, 11001, 11002, 11003, 11006, and 11013).
| S-EPMC9641180 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsTo characterize comparative risks and benefits of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone in a contemporary cohort where the unregulated drug supply is dominated by fentanyl.Design, setting and participantsPopulation-based propensity-score matched cohort study conducted in Ontario, Canada among people aged 18+ initiating opioid agonist therapy (OAT) for an opioid use disorder between October 2016 and December 2018 (n = 18 880).InterventionInitiation of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was opioid overdose (fatal and non-fatal) while on treatment, with secondary outcomes including opioid overdose (first 30 days of treatment), treatment discontinuation, health-care interactions related to treatment of opioid use disorder, receiving a weekly supply of take-home doses and opioid overdose within 30 days of treatment discontinuation. Outcomes were assessed over 1 year.FindingsOverall, 7517 people initiating buprenorphine were matched to an equal number of methadone-treated individuals. Risk of opioid overdose while on treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.37-0.68] or within the first 30 days of treatment (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.31-0.85) was lower among buprenorphine recipients compared to methadone recipients. In secondary analyses, people initiating buprenorphine had a higher risk of treatment discontinuation within the first year (median time to discontinuation 104 versus 265 days, HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.37-1.49), had lower rates of health-care interactions for OUD (186.4 versus 254.3 per person-year; rate ratio = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.72-0.75), and a higher rate of receiving weekly take-home doses (HR = 2.33; 95% CI = 2.20-2.46). Overdose rates in the period following OAT discontinuation were higher than those observed while on treatment, but did not differ significantly by OAT type.ConclusionsAlthough treatment retention is higher among methadone recipients, overdose risk is also elevated compared to buprenorphine recipients. These findings demonstrate the benefits of any OAT on avoidance of overdose, particularly following treatment discontinuation and with the increasingly unpredictable drug supply in North America.
| S-EPMC9313829 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate whether cancer decedents who received palliative care early (ie, >6 months before death) and not-early had different risk of using hospital care and supportive home care in the last month of life.Design/settingWe identified a population-based cohort of cancer decedents between 2004 and 2014 in Ontario, Canada using linked administrative data. Analysis occurred between August 2017 to March 2019.ParticipantsWe propensity-score matched decedents on receiving early or not-early palliative care using billing claims. We created two groups of matched pairs: one that had Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) home care assessments in the exposure period (Yes-RAI group) and one that did not (No-RAI group) to control for confounders uniquely available in the assessment, such as health instability and pain. The outcomes were the absolute risk difference between matched pairs in receiving hospital care, supportive home care or hospital death.ResultsIn the No-RAI group, we identified 36 238 pairs who received early and not-early palliative care. Those in the early palliative care group versus not-early group had a lower absolute risk difference of dying in hospital (-10.0%) and receiving hospital care (-10.4%) and a higher absolute risk difference of receiving supportive home care (23.3%). In the Yes-RAI group, we identified 3586 pairs, where results were similar in magnitude and direction.ConclusionsCancer decedents who received palliative care earlier than 6 months before death compared with those who did not had a lower absolute risk difference of receiving hospital care and dying in hospital, and an increased absolute risk difference of receiving supportive home care in the last month of life.
| S-EPMC7883853 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesWe examined the relationship between dominant sedation strategy, risk of delirium and patient-centred outcomes in adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs).DesignRetrospective propensity-matched cohort study.SettingMechanically ventilated adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to four Canadian hospital medical/surgical ICUs from 2014 to 2016 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Participants2837 mechanically ventilated adults (≥ 18 years) requiring admission to a medical/surgical ICU were evaluated for the relationship between sedation strategy and delirium.InterventionsNone.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary exposure was dominant sedation strategy, defined as the sedative infusion, including midazolam, propofol or fentanyl, with the longest duration before the first delirium assessment. The primary outcome was 'ever delirium' identified using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), ventilation duration and days with delirium. The cohort was analysed in two propensity score (patient characteristics and therapies received) matched cohorts (propofol vs fentanyl and propofol vs midazolam).Results2837 patients (60.7% male; median age 57 years (IQR 43-68)) were considered for propensity matching. In propensity score-matched cohorts(propofol vs midazolam, n=712; propofol vs fentanyl, n=1732), the odds of delirium were significantly higher with midazolam (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.00)) and fentanyl (OR 1.22 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.48)) compared with propofol dominant sedation strategies. Dominant sedation strategy with midazolam and fentanyl were associated with a longer duration of ventilation compared with propofol. Fentanyl was also associated with increased ICU mortality (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.12)) ICU and hospital LOS compared with a propofol dominant sedation strategy.ConclusionsWe identified a novel association between fentanyl dominant sedation strategies and an increased risk of delirium, a composite outcome of delirium or death, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and hospital LOS. Midazolam dominant sedation strategies were associated with increased delirium risk and mechanical ventilation duration.
| S-EPMC8292822 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a well-known predictor for future cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. However, the relationship between ED and dementia has rarely been examined. This study investigates the longitudinal risk for Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer dementia in patients with ED. We collected a random sample of 1,000,000 individuals from Taiwan's National Health Insurance database. From this sample, we identified 4153 patients with newly diagnosed ED between 2000 and 2009 and compared them with a matched cohort of 20,765 patients without ED. All patients were tracked for 7 years from the index date to identify which of them subsequently developed dementia. During the 7-year follow-up period, the incidence rate of dementia in the ED cohort was 35.33 per 10,000 person-years. In the comparison groups, it was 21.67 per 10,000 person-years. After adjustment for patients characteristics and comorbidities, patients with ED were 1.68-times more likely to develop dementia than patients without ED (95% CI = 1.34-2.10, P < 0.0001). In addition, older patients and those with diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, stroke, depression, and anxiety were found to be at increased risk for dementia. Analyzing the data by dementia type, we found the hazard risk for Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer dementia to be greater in patients with ED (adjusted HR 1.68, 95% CI = 1.31-2.16, P < 0.0001 and 1.63, 95% CI = 1.02-2.62, P = 0.0429, respectively). Log-rank test revealed that patients with ED had significantly higher cumulative incidence rates of dementia than those without (P < 0.0001). Patients with ED are at an increased risk for dementia later in life.
| S-EPMC4616558 | biostudies-other
Project description:Objectives The aim of this study was to analyze long-term outcomes of Chinese coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with (and without) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a chronic condition which often develops in conjunction with CAD. PCI is a core therapy for CAD, although we still need to understand CAD-COPD outcomes and to identify factors that influence prognoses, across ethnicities. Methods This double-cohort study involved 12,343 Chinese CAD patients who received PCI. Baseline characteristics were collected in two independent, specialty centers. Propensity-score matching was performed to control confounding factors, using a nearest neighbor matching method within a 0.02 caliper and on a propensity score scale of 0.1 for each center. Comorbid CAD-COPD cases were compared to non-COPD patients in terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Results Patients with COPD were generally older than those without COPD (65.4 ± 9.2 vs. 58.2 ± 10.3, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the end points between COPD and non-COPD groups after PCI (All p > 0.05); however, the incidence of MACEs increased after 450 days. Further subgroup analysis suggests that COPD is approximately four times more prevalent among those aged over 75 years (HR, 3.818; 95%CI, 1.10–13.29; p = 0.027) and those aged below 55 years (HR = 4.254; 95% CI, 1.55–11.72; p = 0.003). Conclusion Having COPD does not appear to have a significant impact on CAD outcomes 2 years after PCI, and beyond. However, an increasing number of MACEs was observed after 450 days, which suggests that there may be a double-stage effect of COPD on PCI prognosis. There is a need for focused comorbidity management, specifically for those aged below 55 years and above 75 years.
| S-EPMC9218100 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hematological malignancies is heavily dependent on the availability of suitable donors. Haploidentical donor (HID) and matched sibling donor (MSD) are two important donor options providing faster and easier sources of stem cells, however, due to confounding factors present in most retrospective studies, the validity of comparing outcomes between these two donor types remains uncertain. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial (trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; #ChiCTR-OCH-12002490; registered 22 February 2012; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=7061 ) to compare outcomes of HID versus MSD peripheral blood stem cell-derived transplants in patients with hematologic malignancies between 2015 and 2022. All HID-receiving patients had antithymocyte globulin-based conditioning. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential confounding factors between the two cohorts. A total of 1060 patients were initially reviewed and then 663 patients were ultimately included in the analysis after propensity score matching. The overall survival, relapse-free survival, non-relapse mortality rate and cumulative incidence of relapse were similar between HID and MSD cohorts. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission may have better overall survival with an HID transplant. The present demonstrated that haploidentical transplants can provide outcomes comparable to conventional MSD transplants, and HID should be recommended as one of the optimal donor choices for patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission.
| S-EPMC10193779 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionOver recent years there has been growing evidence of increased risk of mortality associated with antipsychotic use in older people with dementia. Although this concern combined with limited evidence of efficacy has informed guidelines restricting antipsychotic prescription in this population, the use of antipsycotics remains common. Many published studies only report short-term outcomes, are restricted to examining mortality and stroke risk or have other limitations. The aim of this study was to assess adverse outcomes associated with the use of antipsychotics in older people living with dementia in Wales (UK).MethodsThis was a retrospective study of a population-based dementia cohort using the Welsh Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank. The prior event rate ratio (PERR) was used to estimate the influence of exposure to antipsychotic medication on acute cardiac events, venous thromboembolism, stroke and hip fracture, and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare all-cause mortality.ResultsA total of 10,339 people aged ≥65 years were identified with newly diagnosed dementia. After excluding those who did not meet the inclusion criteria, 9674 people remained in the main cohort of whom 3735 were exposed to antipsychotic medication. An increased risk of a venous thromboembolic episode [PERR 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83-2.0], stroke (PERR 1.41, 95% CI 1.4-1.46) and hip fracture (PERR 1.62, 95% CI 1.59-1.65) was associated with antipsychotic use. However, there was no long-term increased mortality in people exposed to antipsychotics (adjusted hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.13).ConclusionsThe increase in adverse medical events supports guidelines restricting antipsychotic use in this population.
| S-EPMC5447553 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLittle is known about how multimorbidity, dementia and increasing age combine to influence health outcomes or utilization. Our objective was to examine the joint associations between age, dementia and burden of morbidity with mortality and other clinical outcomes.MethodsWe did a retrospective population-based cohort study of all adults aged 65 years and older residing in Alberta, Canada, between 2002 and 2013. We used validated algorithms applied to administrative and laboratory data from the provincial health ministry to assess the presence/absence of dementia and 29 other morbidities, and their associations with mortality (our primary outcome), other clinical outcomes (emergency department visits, all-cause hospital admissions) and a proxy for loss of independent living (discharge to long-term care). Cox and Poisson models were adjusted for year-varying covariates. A 3-way interaction was modelled for dementia, the number of comorbidities, and age.ResultsThere were 610 457 adults aged 65 years and older living in Alberta over the study period. Over median follow-up of 6.8 years, 153 125 (25.1%) participants died and 5569 (0.9%) were discharged to long-term care. The prevalence of people with at least 3 morbidities was 33.7% in 2003 and 50.2% in 2012. The prevalence of dementia rose from 6.2% in fiscal year 2003 to 8.3% in fiscal year 2012, representing a net increase of approximately 13 700 people. The likelihood of all 4 outcomes increased with age and with greater burden of morbidity; the presence of dementia further increased these risks. For example, the risk of mortality increased by 1.54 to 6.38 in the presence of dementia, depending on age and morbidity burden. The risk associated with dementia was attenuated by increasing comorbidity.InterpretationOlder age, multimorbidity and dementia are all strongly correlated with adverse health outcomes as well as a proxy for loss of independent living. The increasing prevalences of dementia and multimorbidity over time suggest the need for coordinated national strategies aimed at mitigating the health challenges associated with the aging of the population.
| S-EPMC5621962 | biostudies-literature