Dataset Information

Comparative hazard analysis and toxicological modeling of diverse nanomaterials using the embryonic zebrafish (EZ) metric of toxicity.

ABSTRACT: The integration of rapid assays, large datasets, informatics, and modeling can overcome current barriers in understanding nanomaterial structure-toxicity relationships by providing a weight-of-the-evidence mechanism to generate hazard rankings for nanomaterials. Here, we present the use of a rapid, low-cost assay to perform screening-level toxicity evaluations of nanomaterials in vivo. Calculated EZ Metric scores, a combined measure of morbidity and mortality in developing embryonic zebrafish, were established at realistic exposure levels and used to develop a hazard ranking of diverse nanomaterial toxicity. Hazard ranking and clustering analysis of 68 diverse nanomaterials revealed distinct patterns of toxicity related to both the core composition and outermost surface chemistry of nanomaterials. The resulting clusters guided the development of a surface chemistry-based model of gold nanoparticle toxicity. Our findings suggest that risk assessments based on the size and core composition of nanomaterials alone may be wholly inappropriate, especially when considering complex engineered nanomaterials. Research should continue to focus on methodologies for determining nanomaterial hazard based on multiple sub-lethal responses following realistic, low-dose exposures, thus increasing the availability of quantitative measures of nanomaterial hazard to support the development of nanoparticle structure-activity relationships.

SUBMITTER: Harper B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4454819 | biostudies-other | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative hazard analysis and toxicological modeling of diverse nanomaterials using the embryonic zebrafish (EZ) metric of toxicity.

Harper Bryan B Thomas Dennis D Chikkagoudar Satish S Baker Nathan N Tang Kaizhi K Heredia-Langner Alejandro A Lins Roberto R Harper Stacey S

Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology 20150604 6

The integration of rapid assays, large datasets, informatics, and modeling can overcome current barriers in understanding nanomaterial structure-toxicity relationships by providing a weight-of-the-evidence mechanism to generate hazard rankings for nanomaterials. Here, we present the use of a rapid, low-cost assay to perform screening-level toxicity evaluations of nanomaterials in vivo. Calculated EZ Metric scores, a combined measure of morbidity and mortality in developing embryonic zebrafish, w ...[more]

PMID: 26069453

Similar Datasets

Project description:Manufacturers of nanomaterial-enabled products need models of endpoints that are relevant to human safety to support the "safe by design" paradigm and avoid late-stage attrition. Increasingly, embryonic zebrafish (Danio Rerio) are recognised as a key human safety relevant in vivo test system. Hence, machine learning models were developed for identifying metal oxide nanomaterials causing lethality to embryonic zebrafish up to 24 hours post-fertilisation, or excess lethality in the period of 24-120 hours post-fertilisation, at concentrations of 250 ppm or less. Models were developed using data from the Nanomaterial Biological-Interactions Knowledgebase for a dataset of 44 diverse, coated and uncoated metal or, in one case, metalloid oxide nanomaterials. Different modelling approaches were evaluated using nested cross-validation on this dataset. Models were initially developed for both lethality endpoints using multiple descriptors representing the composition of the core, shell and surface functional groups, as well as particle characteristics. However, interestingly, the 24 hours post-fertilisation data were found to be harder to predict, which could reflect different exposure routes. Hence, subsequent analysis focused on the prediction of excess lethality at 120 hours-post fertilisation. The use of two data augmentation approaches, applied for the first time in nano-QSAR research, was explored, yet both failed to boost predictive performance. Interestingly, it was found that comparable results to those originally obtained using multiple descriptors could be obtained using a model based upon a single, simple descriptor: the Pauling electronegativity of the metal atom. Since it is widely recognised that a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic nanomaterial characteristics contribute to their toxicological effects, this is a surprising finding. This may partly reflect the need to investigate more sophisticated descriptors in future studies. Future studies are also required to examine how robust these modelling results are on truly external data, which were not used to select the single descriptor model. This will require further laboratory work to generate comparable data to those studied herein.

Project description:Toxicology is traditionally divided between human and eco-toxicology. In the shared pursuit of environmental health, this separation does not account for discoveries made in the comparative studies of animal genomes. Here, we provide evidence on the feasibility of understanding the health impact of chemicals on all animals, including ecological keystone species and humans, based on a significant number of conserved genes and their functional associations to health-related outcomes across much of animal diversity. We test four conditions to understand the value of comparative genomics data to inform mechanism-based human and environmental hazard assessment: (1) genes that are most fundamental for health evolved early during animal evolution; (2) the molecular functions of pathways are better conserved among distantly related species than the individual genes that are members of these pathways; (3) the most conserved pathways among animals are those that cause adverse health outcomes when disrupted; (4) gene sets that serve as molecular signatures of biological processes or disease-states are largely enriched by evolutionarily conserved genes across the animal phylogeny. The concept of homology is applied in a comparative analysis of gene families and pathways among invertebrate and vertebrate species compared with humans. Results show that over 70% of gene families associated with disease are shared among the greatest variety of animal species through evolution. Pathway conservation between invertebrates and humans is based on the degree of conservation within vertebrates and the number of interacting genes within the human network. Human gene sets that already serve as biomarkers are enriched by evolutionarily conserved genes across the animal phylogeny. By implementing a comparative method for chemical hazard assessment, human and eco-toxicology converge towards a more holistic and mechanistic understanding of toxicity disrupting biological processes that are important for health and shared among animals (including humans).

Dataset Information

Comparative hazard analysis and toxicological modeling of diverse nanomaterials using the embryonic zebrafish (EZ) metric of toxicity.

Publications

Comparative hazard analysis and toxicological modeling of diverse nanomaterials using the embryonic zebrafish (EZ) metric of toxicity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets