Dataset Information

Arthroscopic Saucerization and Repair of Discoid Lateral Meniscal Tear.

ABSTRACT: Meniscal tears are among the most commonly diagnosed knee injuries and often require surgical intervention. Understanding the types of meniscal tears and treatment options is paramount to caring for the young athlete. Sports medicine and arthroscopic physicians now recognize that meniscal preservation in the young athlete is essential to the long-term health and function of the knee. Although uncommon, the discoid lateral meniscus is more prone to injury because of its increased thickness and lack of blood supply. Because of the abnormal development, the peripheral attachments are frequently absent and instability often persists after a partial meniscectomy. If the instability is unrecognized during the initial treatment, a recurrence of pain and mechanical symptoms is likely and a subsequent subtotal meniscectomy may be the only treatment option. With increased awareness, arthroscopic saucerization accompanied by arthroscopically assisted inside-out meniscal repair is a preferable treatment option with an excellent outcome.

SUBMITTER: Fields LK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4454895 | biostudies-other | 2015 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Arthroscopic Saucerization and Repair of Discoid Lateral Meniscal Tear.

Fields Logan K LK Caldwell Paul E PE

Arthroscopy techniques 20150427 2

Meniscal tears are among the most commonly diagnosed knee injuries and often require surgical intervention. Understanding the types of meniscal tears and treatment options is paramount to caring for the young athlete. Sports medicine and arthroscopic physicians now recognize that meniscal preservation in the young athlete is essential to the long-term health and function of the knee. Although uncommon, the discoid lateral meniscus is more prone to injury because of its increased thickness and la ...[more]

PMID: 26052498

Similar Datasets

Project description:Arthroscopic repair of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (LM) from an anterolateral portal has a risk of popliteal artery injury. Here, we present an ultrasound-assisted, arthroscopic, all-inside repair technique for a posterior LM tear to reduce the risk of neurovascular injury. An ultrasound probe covered with a sterile sleeve is placed horizontally at the popliteal fossa by an assistant surgeon, and the popliteal artery and posterior LM are confirmed. From the anterolateral portal, an arthroscopic probe is inserted to push the posterior capsule of the lateral compartment, while an ultrasound image detects the tip of the probe. After the probe is confirmed not to be directed toward the popliteal artery, an all-inside suture device is introduced from the anterolateral portal. While the meniscus is penetrated, the surgeon can confirm by ultrasound images that the needle is directed away from the popliteal artery. The guide suture is pulled anteriorly to secure the anchors tightly, and an ultrasound confirms that the anchors are positioned behind the posterior portion of the LM. All sutures are secured under the assistance of ultrasound images, followed by arthroscopic confirmation of a properly secured LM by the all-inside repair technique. Technique Video Video 1 The arthroscopic view from the anterolateral portal shows a decreased volume of the lateral meniscus due to a previous surgical resection. The posterior lateral meniscus (LM) is pulled anteriorly over the center of the lateral compartment by probing. The posterior LM is repaired under the guidance of the ultrasound by having the assistant surgeon place the ultrasound probe, covered with a sterile sleeve, horizontally on the popliteal fossa to allow confirmation of the posterior portion of the LM and the popliteal artery. An all-inside suture device, the JuggerStitch, is introduced from an anterolateral portal, and the tip of the needle is observed in the ultrasound image. While penetrating the posterior LM, the direction of the needle is confirmed not to injure the neurovascular structures. The anchor of the JuggerStich is introduced at the posterior side of the LM and can be observed as a high echoic region. After introduction of two anchors, the sutures are pulled anteriorly through the anterolateral portal, and the knot is tightened. The ultrasound image shows that the two anchors are positioned on the capsule behind the posterior LM. The same procedures are then repeated. The location of the popliteal artery and the direction of the needle are confirmed by ultrasound every time. If the needle is directed toward the artery, it should be extracted and inserted again. A total of 4 sutures are performed to obtain stability of the LM under the assistance of ultrasound. The final arthroscopic examination shows the properly secured repair and the stabilized posterior LM by probing.

Project description:ObjectiveWe examined the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for concomitant meniscal tear and knee osteoarthritis (OA) involving arthroscopic partial meniscectomy surgery and physical therapy (PT).MethodsWe used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a validated Monte Carlo microsimulation, to compare three strategies, 1) PT-only, 2) immediate surgery, and 3) PT + optional surgery, for participants whose pain persists following initial PT. We modeled a cohort with baseline meniscal tear, OA, and demographics from the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus PT. We estimated risks and costs of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy complications and accounted for heightened OA progression post surgery using published data. We estimated surgery use rates and treatment efficacies using MeTeOR data. We considered a 5-year time horizon, discounted costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) 3% per year and conducted sensitivity analyses. We report incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.ResultsRelative to PT-only, PT + optional surgery added 0.0651 QALY and $2,010 over 5 years (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio = $30,900 per QALY). Relative to PT + optional surgery, immediate surgery added 0.0065 QALY and $3080 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio = $473,800 per QALY). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were sensitive to optional surgery efficacy in the PT + optional surgery strategy. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, PT + optional surgery was cost-effective in 51% of simulations at willingness-to-pay thresholds of both $50,000 per QALY and $100,000 per QALY.ConclusionFirst-line arthroscopic partial meniscectomy has a prohibitively high incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Under base case assumptions, second-line arthroscopic partial meniscectomy offered to participants with persistent pain following initial PT is cost-effective at willingness-to-pay thresholds between $31,000 and $473,000 per QALY. Our analyses suggest that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy can be a high-value treatment option for patients with meniscal tear and OA when performed following an initial PT course and should remain a covered treatment option.

Dataset Information

Arthroscopic Saucerization and Repair of Discoid Lateral Meniscal Tear.

Publications

Arthroscopic Saucerization and Repair of Discoid Lateral Meniscal Tear.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets