Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Gu XB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4513342 | biostudies-other | 2015
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundSeveral studies have shown that neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC), but the results are controversial.MethodsThis study was performed to evaluate the prognostic implications of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio of GC in all available studies. We surveyed 2 medical databases, PubMed and EMBASE, to identify all relevant studies. Data were collected from studies comparing overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with GC.ResultsTen studies (n = 2,952) evaluated the role of NLR as a predictor of outcome were involved for this meta-analysis (10 for OS, 3 for DFS, and 2 for PFS). Overall and disease-free survival were significantly better in patients with low NLR value and the pooled HRs was significant at 1.83 ([95% CI], 1.62-2.07) and 1.58 ([95% CI], 1.12-2.21), respectively. For progression-free survival, the pooled hazard ratio of NLR was significant at 1.54 ([95% CI], 1.22-1.95). No evidence of significant heterogeneity or publication bias for OS and DFS was seen in any of the included studies.ConclusionThis meta-analysis indicated that elevated NLR may be associated with a worse prognosis for patients with GC.
| S-EPMC4234250 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPoor prognosis is linked to peripheral blood levels of preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in many advanced cancers. Nevertheless, whether the correlation exists in resected early-stage cases with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stays controversial. Consequently, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the preoperative NLR and PLR's prognostic significance in early-stage patients with NSCLC undergoing curative surgery.MethodsRelevant studies that validated the link between preoperative NLR or PLR and survival results were found via the proceeding databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The merged 95% confidence interval (CI) and hazard ratio (HR) was employed to validate the link between the NLR or PLR's index and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in resected NSCLC cases. We used sensitivity and subgroup analyses to assess the studies' heterogeneity.ResultsAn overall of 21 studies were attributed to the meta-analysis. The findings indicated that great preoperative NLR was considerably correlated with poor DFS (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.37-1.82, p < 0.001) and poor OS (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.33-1.72, p < 0.001), respectively. Subgroup analyses were in line with the pooled findings. In aspect of PLR, raised PLR was indicative of inferior DFS (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04-1.58, p = 0.021) and OS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.18-1.60, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analyses between PLR and DFS, only subgroups with a sample size <300 (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.15-2.43, p = 0.008) and TNM staging of mixed (I-II) (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.07, p = 0.028) showed that the link between high PLR and poor DFS was significant.ConclusionsPreoperative elevated NLR and PLR may act as prognostic biomarkers in resected early-stage NSCLC cases and are therefore valuable for guiding postoperative adjuvant treatment.
| S-EPMC10067053 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:We evaluated pretreatment total lymphocyte count (TLC, marker of immunosuppression), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR, marker of inflammation), and overall survival (OS) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). METHODS:Pretreatment blood characteristics, age, sex, performance status, race, stage (M1a vs. M1b), number and location of metastases, weight loss, smoking status, chemotherapy cycles (<4 vs. ?4), thoracic radiotherapy dose (<45 vs. ?45?Gy), and receipt of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were evaluated in 252 patients with ES-SCLC treated in 1998-2015. Factors significant in univariate analysis were selected as covariates for a multivariate Cox model. RESULTS:Pretreatment TLC was below normal (<1.0?×?103/µL) in 58 patients (23%). Median OS time was 11.0?months and was worse for those with TLC???1.5?×?103/µL (9.8 vs. 12.0?months) and pretreatment NLR?>?4.0 (9.4 vs. 13.9?months). Multivariate analysis identified low TLC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.734, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.565-0.955, P?=?0.021) and high NLR (HR 1.521, 95% CI 1.172-1.976, P?=?0.002) as predicting inferior survival. Age (>63?y), sex (male), performance status (?2), chemotherapy cycles (<4), radiation dose (<45?Gy), and no PCI also predicted worse OS (P?<?0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Pretreatment TLC and NLR may be useful for stratifying patients with ES-SCLC for treatment approaches.
| S-EPMC5856620 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a useful biomarker that reflects systemic inflammation responses. However, the prognostic value of the NLR in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC) remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of 26 studies (comprising 4,461 patients) to evaluate the association between the pre-treatment NLR and clinical outcomes of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with PLC. The correlation between NLR and tumor characteristics or other inflammation-related parameters was also assessed. Data were synthesized using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, and the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate effect size. Our analysis indicated that a high NLR predicted poor OS (HR, 2.102; 95% CI: 1.741-2.538) and DFS (HR, 2.474; 95% CI: 1.855-3.300) for PLC. A high NLR was associated with the presence of tumor vascular invasion (OR: 1.889, 95% CI: 1.487-2.400; p<0.001) and an elevated alpha-fetoprotein level (OR: 1.536; 95% CI: 1.152-2.048; p = 0.003). Thus, we conclude that a high NLR indicates a poor prognosis for patients with PLC and may also be predictive for PLC invasion and metastasis. Subgroup analysis suggested that the predictive role of NLR in cholangiocarcinoma is limited, and a further large study to confirm these findings is warranted.
| S-EPMC4008563 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimNeutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), or monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) has been shown to be related to the poor prognosis of cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and other malignant tumors, but their role in predicting the prognosis of endometrial cancer is still controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of NLR more accurately, PLR, or MLR in predicting the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC).MethodsThis review systematically searched for relevant publications in databases of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and CBM. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined and used to explore the association between inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, PLR, and MLR) and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in a random-effects model. We also conducted subgroup analysis and publication bias in this meta-analysis. Stata 12.0 was used for statistical analysis.ResultsThis meta-analysis contained 14 eligible studies including 5,274 patients. Our results showed that NLR or PLR was associated with OS [NLR: HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.70-3.71; p <0.001 in univariate analysis (Ua); HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.34-2.60; p <0.001 in multivariate analysis (Ma); PLR: HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.82-3.43; p <0.001 in Ua; HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.22-2.83; p = 0.004 in Ma], but MLR was not associated with OS (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.70-2.95; p = 0.325 in Ua; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.39-2.60; p =0.987 in Ma). A further subgroup analysis found that the correlations were not affected by race, cutoff value, sample size, or treatment. Our meta-analysis showed that NLR or PLR was associated with DFS (NLR: HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.38-4.56; p =0.003 in Ua; HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.26-3.37, P =0.004 in Ma; PLR: HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.30-2.81; p = 0.001 in Ua), and NLR was associated with PFS only in the univariate analysis (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.04-2.81; p =0.035 in Ua; HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.65-4.89; P =0.257 in Ma), but MLR was not associated with DFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.03-4.13; p =0.409 in Ua).ConclusionsOur results indicated that pretreatment NLR and PLR were biomarkers of poor prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer. The results indicated that NLR or PLR was associated with OS and disease-free survival DFS, and NLR was associated with PFS only in univariate analysis, but MLR was not associated with OS or DFS.
| S-EPMC9149577 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been investigated as a prognostic marker in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, the results remain controversial. This study aimed to explore the association between NLR and survival outcomes and clinicopathological factors in DLBCL.MethodsRelevant studies were retrieved by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. The last search was updated on February 17, 2017. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effective measures in the meta-analysis. Random-effects models and fixed-effects models were used for analyses. Meta-regression was performed. Publication bias was assessed using Begg's test. Stata version 12.0 was used for all analyses.ResultsA total of 9 studies with 2297 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that NLR was a significant indicator for poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.52-2.22, p<0.001) and poor progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.36-1.98, p<0.001). NLR remained a significant biomarker for OS and PFS regardless of location, sample size or cut-off value. In addition, high NLR was also associated with Ann Arbor stage (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.14-3.81, p = 0.017), lactate dehydrogenase level (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.16-6.46, p = 0.021), extranodal disease (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.06-2.52, p = 0.027), and International Prognostic Index score (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.03-5.08, p = 0.043). However, NLR was found to have no significant association with sex (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.71-1.11, p = 0.29), age (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.94-1.48, p = 0.152), European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 0.71-4.46, p = 0.217), or presence of B symptoms (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 0.7-3.48, p = 0.278).ConclusionIn conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated that NLR has a strong association with worse OS and PFS in patients with DLBCL. NLR could be recommended as an inexpensive prognostic biomarker in DLBCL.
| S-EPMC5404792 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Systemic inflammation responses can be reflected by peripheral blood count and combine index like the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR). The NLR has been reported to be a poor prognostic indicator in cancer recently. However, the prognostic effect of the NLR in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) still unclear yet. We conducted this meta-analysis aiming to evaluate the pooled value of NLR in prognosis as well as clinical characteristics in malignant pleural mesothelioma. A total of 11 studies with 1533 patients were included in this meta-analysis, in which 10 studies investigated the prognosis role of NLR using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The elevated NLR was detected to be associated with a poor overall survival (OS)(HR=1.48, 95%CI=1.16-1.89, P < 0.001). The significant prognostic roles of NLR were also indicated in subgroup analyses. NLR level was also associated with histology instead of gender, stage or performance status (PS) score. These findings suggested that the elevated NLR could be a potential prognostic factor for malignant pleural mesothelioma patients and might be associated with histology as an efficient clinical index to stratify patients.
| S-EPMC5593657 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers with significant morbidity and mortality. It is important to predict the prognosis of patients. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess the prognostic and clinicopathologic significance of NLR in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and CNKI. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as the effect estimation to evaluate the prognostic role of NLR. Odds ratio (OR) was used to evaluate the relation between NLR and clinicopathologic characteristics. Results: A total of 8431 patients from 32 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that elevated NLR might predict poor prognosis: The factors considered included overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.40-1.75; P < .001), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.09-1.49; P < .001), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.29-1.72; P < .001), and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR,1.58; 95% CI, 1.27-1.97; P < .001). High NLR was also associated with tumor differentiation, tumor length, tumor invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, and clinical stage. No significant association was observed between NLR and metastasis stage (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.98-2.98; P = .058). Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that elevated NLR value might predict poor prognosis (OS, CSS, PFS, and DFS), according to abnormal clinicopathologic parameters.
| S-EPMC8785352 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Current research shows that platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has important prognostic value in renal cell carcinoma, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, liver cancer and colon cancer. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prognostic value of PLR in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through meta-analysis. METHODS:Literature search for PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), China Biomedical Medicine disc (CBMdisc), VIP, Wanfang Database using computer electronic system to study the association between PLR and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Each eligible study data is extracted and a meta-analysis is performed using the hazard risk (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) to assess the prognostic value of PLR, the time limit for the search is to build the library until November 2018. RESULTS:We include a total of 15 research literatures involving 5,524 patients for meta-analysis. According to the results of the meta-analysis: The OS of the higher PLR group is significantly lower than that of the lower PLR group (HR=1.69, 95%CI: 1.45-1.97, P<0.000,01, I²=46.2%, Pheterogeneity=0.026); the DFS of the higher PLR group is significantly lower than that of the lower PLR group (HR=1.41, 95%CI: 1.14-1.74, P=0.001, I²=46.2%, Pheterogeneity=0.026). Subgroup analysis show that the OS of the higher PLR group is still significantly lower than the lower PLR group (P<0.05) after grouping by ethnicity, sample size, PLR cutoff value and treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Increased PLR is associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC, so PLR may be an important biological predictive marker for NSCLC patients, however, its clinical application still needs to be verified through more research in the future.
| S-EPMC6533188 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectiveInflammation is deemed to play critical roles in tumor progression and metastasis, and an increased neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to correlate with poor survivals in various malignancies. However, association between NLR elevation and survival outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of elevated NLR in CRLM.MethodsThe meta-analysis was conducted in adherence to the MOOSE guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and the Chinese SinoMed were systematically searched to identify eligible studies from the initiation of the databases to May, 2016. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were pooled by using hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Correlation between NLR values and clinicopathological features was synthesized by using odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% CI.ResultsA total of 1685 patients from 8 studies (9 cohorts) were analyzed, consisting 347 (20.59%) in high pretreatment NLR value group and 1338 (79.41%) in low pretreatment NLR value one. The results demonstrated that elevated pretreatment NLR was significantly related to poor OS (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.82-2.58) and RFS (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.64-2.35) in patients with CRLM.ConclusionThe result of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that an elevated pretreatment NLR was closely correlated with poor long-term survival (OS and RFS) in CRLM patients. NLR can be routinely monitored and serve as a useful and cost-effective marker with strong prognostic significance in patients with CRLM.
| S-EPMC4948783 | biostudies-literature