What to do With Wake-Up Stroke.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Rubin MN
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4530419 | biostudies-other | 2015 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Publications
Wake-up stroke, defined as the situation where a patient awakens with stroke symptoms that were not present prior to falling asleep, represents roughly 1 in 5 acute ischemic strokes and remains a therapeutic dilemma. Patients with wake-up stroke were excluded from most ischemic stroke treatment trials and are often not eligible for acute reperfusion therapy in clinical practice, leading to poor outcomes. Studies of neuroimaging with standard noncontrast computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonan ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundAbout one in five strokes occur during sleep (wake-up stroke). People with wake-up strokes have traditionally been considered ineligible for thrombolytic treatment because the time of stroke onset is unknown. However, some studies suggest that these people may benefit from recanalisation therapies.ObjectivesTo assess the effects of intravenous thrombolysis and other recanalisation therapies versus control in people with acute ischaemic stroke presenting on awakening.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last search: 9 January 2018). In addition, we searched the following electronic databases in December 2017: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 11) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), the ISRCTN registry, and Stroke Trials Registry. We also screened references lists of relevant trials, contacted trialists, undertook forward tracking of relevant references, and contacted manufacturers of relevant devices and equipment.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials of intravenous thrombolytic drugs or intra-arterial therapies in people with acute ischaemic stroke presenting upon awakening.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors applied the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed trial quality and risk of bias using the GRADE approach. We obtained both published and unpublished data.Main resultsWe included one pilot trial with nine participants. The trial was a feasibility trial that included participants with an unknown onset of stroke and signs on perfusion computed tomography of ischaemic tissue at risk of infarction, who were randomised to alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) or placebo. One trial was prematurely terminated due to signs of efficacy of the intervention arm; we did not include this trial because we were not able to obtain data for the portion of the participants with wake-up stroke after requesting this information from the trial authors. We identified six ongoing trials.Authors' conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence from randomised controlled trials for recommendations concerning recanalisation therapies for wake-up stroke. Results from ongoing trials will hopefully establish the efficacy and safety of such therapies.
| S-EPMC6513546 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Wake-up stroke or stroke with unclear onset of symptoms is known to occur in one-fourth of ischemic stroke patients. These patients are not considered for thrombolytic therapy based on time designation of their symptom onset as per the current guidelines. Observational studies have investigated the pathophysiology and suggested actual onset of symptoms to be approximate to the awakening time for these patients. Use of advanced imaging modalities in these patients tends to identify favorable patient profiles for thrombolysis. Results of the ongoing trials will likely beckon a seminal juncture in stroke therapy and deliver critical modifications in the current treatment guidelines for thrombolysis in this substantial, yet neglected, group of stroke patients. In this article, we have reviewed the predisposing factors, preferred imaging modalities and various ongoing thrombolytic and endovascular trials to date for patients with unclear time of symptom onset or who wake up with stroke symptoms.
| S-EPMC6126251 | biostudies-other
Project description:Objective/backgroundObstructive sleep apnea is a risk factor for stroke. This study sought to assess the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and wake-up strokes (WUS), that is, stroke symptoms that are first noted upon awakening from sleep.Patients/methodsIn this analysis, 837 Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) project participants completed an interview to ascertain stroke onset during sleep (WUS) versus wakefulness (non-wake-up stroke, non-WUS). A subset of 316 participants underwent a home sleep apnea test (HSAT) shortly after ischemic stroke to assess for OSA. Regression models were used to test the association between OSA and WUS, stratified by sex.ResultsOf 837 participants who completed the interview, 251 (30%) reported WUS. Among participants who underwent an HSAT, there was no significant difference in OSA severity [respiratory event index (REI)] among participants with WUS [median REI 17, interquartile range (IQR) 10, 29] versus non-WUS (median REI 18, IQR 9, 30; p = 0.73). OSA severity was not associated with increased odds of WUS among men [unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.011, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.995, 1.027] or women (unadjusted OR 0.987, 95% CI 0.959, 1.015). These results remained unchanged after adjustment for age, congestive heart failure, body mass index, and pre-stroke depression in men (adjusted OR 1.011, 95% CI 0.994, 1.028) and women (adjusted OR 0.988, 95% CI 0.959, 1.018).ConclusionsAlthough OSA is a risk factor for stroke, the onset of stroke during sleep is not associated with OSA in this large, population-based stroke cohort.
| S-EPMC8563108 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPopulation-based knowledge of the characteristics of wake-up stroke and unknown-onset stroke is limited. We compared occurrence and characteristics of ischaemic and haemorrhagic wake-up stroke, unknown-onset stroke and known-onset stroke in a nationwide register-based study.Patients and methodsWe included patients registered in the Norwegian Stroke Register from 2012 through 2019. Age, sex, risk factors, clinical characteristics, acute stroke treatment and discharge destination were compared according to stroke type and time of onset.ResultsOf the 60,320 patients included, 11,451 (19%) had wake-up stroke, 11,098 (18.4%) had unknown time of onset and 37,771 (62.6%) had known symptom onset. The proportion of haemorrhagic stroke was lower among wake-up stroke patients (1107/11,451, 9.7%, 95% CI: 9.1-10.2) than for known-onset stroke (5230/37,771, 13.8%, 95% CI: 13.5-14.2) and for unknown-onset stroke (1850/11,098, 16.7%, 95% CI: 16.0-17.4). Mild stroke (NIHSS <5) was more frequent in ischaemic wake-up stroke (5364/8308, 64.6%, 95% CI: 63.5-65.5) than in known-onset (16,417/26,746, 61.4%, 95% CI: 60.8-62.0) and unknown-onset stroke (3242/5853, 55.4%, 95% CI: 54.1-56.7), while baseline characteristics were otherwise similar to known-onset stroke. Unknown-onset stroke patients were more often female, lived alone and had more severe strokes compared to wake-up stroke and known-onset stroke patients. Unknown-onset stroke patients were more often in need of community-based health care on discharge and had a higher in-hospital mortality.Discussion and conclusionsIschaemic wake-up strokes shared baseline characteristics with known-onset strokes, but tended to be milder. Ischaemic unknown-onset stroke patients differed significantly from wake-up stroke, emphasising the importance of considering them as separate entities.
| S-EPMC9134780 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8632645 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThrombolytic treatment (tissue-type plasminogen activator [tPA]) is only recommended for acute ischemic stroke patients with stroke onset time <4.5 hours. tPA is not recommended when stroke onset time is unknown. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI mismatch information has been found to approximate stroke onset time with some accuracy. Therefore, we developed a micro-simulation model to project health outcomes and costs of MRI-based treatment decisions versus no treatment for acute wake-up stroke patients.Methods and findingsThe model assigned simulated patients a true stroke onset time from a specified probability distribution. DWI-FLAIR mismatch estimated stroke onset <4.5 hours with sensitivity and specificity of 0.62 and 0.78, respectively. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores reflected tPA treatment effectiveness accounting for patients' true stroke onset time. Discounted lifetime costs and benefits (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) were projected for each strategy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for the MRI-based strategy in base-case and sensitivity analyses. With no treatment, 45.1% of simulated patients experienced a good stroke outcome (mRS score 0-1). Under the MRI-based strategy, in which 17.0% of all patients received tPA despite stroke onset times >4.5 hours, 46.3% experienced a good stroke outcome. Lifetime discounted QALYs and costs were 5.312 and $88,247 for the no treatment strategy and 5.342 and $90,869 for the MRI-based strategy, resulting in an ICER of $88,000/QALY. Results were sensitive to variations in patient- and provider-specific factors such as sleep duration, hospital travel and door-to-needle times, as well as onset probability distribution, MRI specificity, and mRS utility values.ConclusionsOur model-based findings suggest that an MRI-based treatment strategy for this population could be cost-effective and quantifies the impact that patient- and provider-specific factors, such as sleep duration, hospital travel and door-to-needle times, could have on the optimal decision for wake-up stroke patients.
| S-EPMC4740488 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatients with wake-up ischemic stroke who have evidence of salvageable tissue on advanced imaging can benefit from intravenous thrombolysis. It is not known whether patients who do not fulfil such imaging criteria might benefit from treatment, but studies indicate that treatment based on non-contrast CT criteria may be safe. Tenecteplase has shown promising results in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The aim of the Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischemic Stroke Trial (TWIST) is to compare the effect of thrombolytic treatment with tenecteplase and standard care versus standard care alone in patients with wake-up ischemic stroke selected by non-contrast CT.Methods/designTWIST is an international, investigator-initiated, multi-centre, prospective, randomized-controlled, open-label, blinded end-point trial of tenecteplase (n = 300) versus standard care (n = 300) in patients who wake up with an acute ischemic stroke and can be treated within 4.5 h upon awakening. Seventy-seven centres in 10 countries (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom) participate. The primary outcome is the modified Rankin Scale on the ordinal scale (0-6) at three months.DiscussionTWIST aims to determine the effect and safety of thrombolytic treatment with tenecteplase in patients with wake-up ischemic stroke selected by non-contrast CT.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03181360. EudraCT Number 2014-000096-80.
| S-EPMC8554491 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAccurate prediction of subsequent infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients helps determine appropriate interventions and prognosis. The objectives are to assess whether early multimodal CT imaging characteristics of wake-up stroke (WUS) patients could predict post-reperfusion infarct volume and evaluate the accuracy of baseline infarct and penumbra volumes for predicting follow-up infarct volume.MethodsThis retrospective study included WUS patients, last seen well (LSW) >6 h, with multimodal CT imaging at baseline. Baseline non-contrast CT (NCCT) and CT perfusion were analyzed using RAPID software, and CT angiography using maximum intensity projection. Post-reperfusion infarct volume was assessed at 24-h following reperfusion on magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Patients were stratified by treatment module for analyses.ResultsOf 34 eligible patients, 9 (26.5%) received intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) alone and 25 (73.5%) received both endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and r-tPA. All patients had a strong correlation between baseline NCCT alberta stroke program early CT score, clot burden score (CBS), Tan score, infarct volume, penumbra volume with 24-h post-reperfusion infarct volume (respectively, r=0.172, P=0.015; r=0.118, P=0.047; r=0.149, P=0.024; r=0.311, P=0.001 and r=0.120; P=0.045). Among reperfusion therapies, WUS patients who received EVT had a significantly lower 24-h post-reperfusion infarct volume and had a significant difference between baseline infarct volume and 24-h post-reperfusion infarct volume (respectively, 82 vs. 14, P=0.032 and 47 vs. 14, P=0.04).ConclusionsPrimarily obtained multimodal CT imaging characteristics may predict post-reperfusion infarct volume in WUS patients, and those who underwent EVT had a significantly lower post-reperfusion infarct volume.
| S-EPMC9929407 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatients with wake-up ischemic stroke are frequently excluded from thrombolytic treatment due to unknown symptom onset time and limited availability of advanced imaging modalities. The Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischaemic Stroke Trial (TWIST) is a randomized controlled trial of intravenous tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and standard care versus standard care alone (no thrombolysis) in patients who wake up with acute ischemic stroke and can be treated within 4.5 h of wakening based on non-contrast CT findings.ObjectiveTo publish the detailed statistical analysis plan for TWIST prior to unblinding.MethodsThe TWIST statistical analysis plan is consistent with the Consolidating Standard of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement and provides clear and open reporting.DiscussionPublication of the statistical analysis plan serves to reduce potential trial reporting bias and clearly outlines the pre-specified analyses.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03181360 . EudraCT Number 2014-000096-80 . WHO ICRTP registry number ISRCTN10601890 .
| S-EPMC9118782 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesWake-up stroke is an important clinical problem that may account for a quarter of all ischemic strokes. This study aimed to establish the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment of wake-up strokes by comparing it to the standard thrombolysis treatment in strokes with clear onsets and wake-up strokes that did not receive reperfusion therapy.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 95 patients with ischemic strokes who underwent thrombolytic treatment with alteplase, including nine patients with wake-up strokes. The safety profile (mortality and intracranial bleeding) and efficacy (clinical and functional outcomes on admission, discharge, and 90 days after stroke onset) were evaluated.ResultsWhen assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRs), the patients with wake-up strokes had significantly more favorable functional outcomes on discharge when compared to those who received standard thrombolysis (p = .0289). No significant differences were noted when the favorable outcome rate (mRs score = 0-2) at three months post-thrombolysis (Odds ratio [OR] = 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-10.6; p = .3807) and safety outcomes (death during hospitalization: OR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.03-9.11; p = .6295 and intracranial bleeding 24 hr after treatment: OR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.02-7.58; p = .5707) were compared between the two groups. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenchel shift analysis showed a significantly more favorable distribution of the mRs scores at three months after the stroke onset in the patients with wake-up strokes who were treated with alteplase compared to those who did not receive thrombolysis (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.01-1.82; p = .0426).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that in patients who awaken with stroke symptoms, intravenous thrombolytic treatment is a safe procedure that may lead to favorable outcomes. Further studies should be performed to increase the size of the group of patients with wake-up strokes who can be treated with reperfusion therapy.
| S-EPMC8213934 | biostudies-literature