Clinical Genetic Testing in Epilepsy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Mefford HC
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4532232 | biostudies-other | 2015 Jul-Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:With the burgeoning array of molecular tests available in the epilepsies, the clinician needs to know which tests to order for each patient. Epileptic encephalopathies are the most important clinical group for genetic testing with an increasing number of distinctive epilepsy syndromes being recognized. Identification of the causative mutation affects treatment as well as prognostic and genetic counseling.
| S-EPMC3152152 | biostudies-other
Project description:Rapid advances in genetics have led to an increased understanding of the genetic determinants of human disease, including many gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Coupled with a proliferation of genetic testing services, this has resulted in a clinical landscape where commercially available genetic tests for GI disorders are now widely available. In this review, we discuss the current status of clinical genetic testing for GI illnesses, review the available testing options, and briefly discuss indications for and practical aspects of such testing. Our goal is to familiarize the practicing gastroenterologist with this rapidly changing and important aspect of clinical care.
| S-EPMC4855164 | biostudies-other
Project description:Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are a group of severe, early onset epilepsies characterized by refractory seizures, developmental delay or regression associated with ongoing epileptic activity, and generally poor prognosis. DEE is genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous, and there is a plethora of genetic testing options to investigate the rapidly growing list of epilepsy genes. However, more than 50% of patients with DEE remain without a genetic diagnosis despite state-of-the-art genetic testing. In this review, we discuss the major advances in epilepsy genomics that have surfaced in recent years. The goal of this review is to reach a larger audience and build a better understanding of pathogenesis and genetic testing options in DEE.
| S-EPMC7076331 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Epilepsy includes a number of medical conditions with recurrent seizures as common denominator. The large number of different syndromes and seizure types as well as the highly variable inter-individual response to the therapies makes management of this condition often challenging. In the last two decades, a genetic etiology has been revealed in more than half of all epilepsies and single gene defects in ion channels or neurotransmitter receptors have been associated with most inherited forms of epilepsy, including some focal and lesional forms as well as specific epileptic developmental encephalopathies. Several genetic tests are now available, including targeted assays up to revolutionary tools that have made sequencing of all coding (whole exome) and non-coding (whole genome) regions of the human genome possible. These recent technological advances have also driven genetic discovery in epilepsy and increased our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of many epileptic disorders, eventually providing targets for precision medicine in some syndromes, such as Dravet syndrome, pyroxidine-dependent epilepsy, and glucose transporter 1 deficiency. However, these examples represent a relatively small subset of all types of epilepsy, and to date, precision medicine in epilepsy has primarily focused on seizure control, and other clinical aspects, such as neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric comorbidities, have yet been possible to address. We herein summarize the most recent advances in genetic testing and provide up-to-date approaches for the choice of the correct test for some epileptic disorders and tailored treatments that are already applicable in some monogenic epilepsies. In the next years, the most probably scenario is that epilepsy treatment will be very different from the currently almost empirical approach, eventually with a "precision medicine" approach applicable on a large scale.
| S-EPMC7283411 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genetic variants in relevant genes coexisting with MRI lesions in children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) can negatively influence epilepsy surgery outcomes. Still, presurgical evaluation does not include genetic diagnostics routinely. Here, we report our presurgical evaluation algorithm that includes routine genetic testing. We analyzed retrospectively the data of 68 children with DRE operated at a mean age of 7.8 years (IQR: 8.1 years) at our center. In 49 children, genetic test results were available. We identified 21 gene variants (ACMG III: n = 7, ACMG IV: n = 2, ACMG V: n = 12) in 19 patients (45.2%) in the genes TSC1, TSC2, MECP2, DEPDC5, HUWE1, GRIN1, ASH1I, TRIO, KIF5C, CDON, ANKD11, TGFBR2, ATN1, COL4A1, JAK2, KCNQ2, ATP1A2, and GLI3 by whole-exome sequencing as well as deletions and duplications by array CGH in six patients. While the results did not change the surgery indication, they supported counseling with respect to postoperative chance of seizure freedom and weaning of antiseizure medication (ASM). The presence of genetic findings leads to the postoperative retention of at least one ASM. In our cohort, the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE) seizure outcome did not differ between patients with and without abnormal genetic findings. However, in the 7/68 patients with an unsatisfactory ILAE seizure outcome IV or V 12 months postsurgery, 2 had an abnormal or suspicious genetic finding as a putative explanation for persisting seizures postsurgery, and 3 had received palliative surgery including one TSC patient. This study highlights the importance of genetic testing in children with DRE to address putative underlying germline variants as genetic epilepsy causes or predisposing factors that guide patient and/or parent counseling on a case-by-case with respect to their individual chance of postoperative seizure freedom and ASM weaning. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Genetic variants in children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) can negatively influence epilepsy surgery outcomes. However, presurgical evaluation does not include genetic diagnostics routinely. This retrospective study analyzed the genetic testing results of the 68 pediatric patients who received epilepsy surgery in our center. We identified 21 gene variants by whole-exome sequencing as well as deletions and duplications by array CGH in 6 patients. These results highlight the importance of genetic testing in children with DRE to guide patient and/or parent counseling on a case-by-case with respect to their individual chance of postoperative seizure freedom and ASM weaning.
| S-EPMC10984286 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The identification of numerous genetically based epilepsies has resulted in the widespread use of genetic testing to inform epilepsy etiology. Our study aims to investigate whether a difference exists in the diagnostic evaluation and healthcare-related cost expenditures of pediatric patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology who receive a genetic diagnosis through multigene epilepsy panel (MEP) testing and comparing those who underwent early (EGT) versus late genetic testing (LGT). Testing was defined as early (less than 1 year), or late (more than 1 year), following clinical epilepsy diagnosis. A retrospective chart review of pediatric individuals (1-17 years) with epilepsy of unknown etiology who underwent multigene epilepsy panel (MEP) testing identified 28 of 226 (12%) individuals with a pathogenic epilepsy variant [EGT n = 8 (29%); LGT n = 20 (71%)]. The average time from clinical epilepsy diagnosis to genetic diagnosis was 0.25 years (EGT), compared with 7.1 years (LGT). The EGT cohort underwent fewer metabolic tests [EGT n = 0 (0%); LGT n = 16 (80%) (P < 0.01)] and invasive procedures [EGT n = 0 (0%); LGT n = 5 (25%) (P = 0.06)]. Clinical management changes implemented due to genetic diagnosis occurred in 10 (36%) patients [EGT n = 2 (25%); LGT n = 8 (40%) (P = 0.76)]. Early genetic testing with a MEP in pediatric patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology who receive a genetic diagnosis is associated with fewer non-diagnostic tests and invasive procedures and reduced estimated overall healthcare-related costs. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study aims to investigate whether a difference exists in the diagnostic evaluation and cost expenditures of pediatric patients (1-17 years) with epilepsy of unknown cause who are ultimately diagnosed with a genetic cause of epilepsy through multigene epilepsy panel testing and comparing those who underwent early testing (less than 1 year) versus late testing (more than 1 year) after clinical epilepsy diagnosis. Of the 28 of 226 individuals with a confirmed genetic cause of epilepsy on multigene epilepsy panel testing, performing early testing was associated with fewer non-diagnostic tests, fewer invasive procedures and reduced estimated overall healthcare-related costs.
| S-EPMC10839360 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceAlthough genetic testing is important for bringing precision medicine to children with epilepsy, it is unclear what genetic testing strategy is best in maximizing diagnostic yield.ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic yield of an exome-based gene panel for childhood epilepsy and discuss the value of follow-up testing.Design, setting, and participantsA case series study was conducted on data from clinical genetic testing at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was conducted from September 26, 2016, to January 8, 2018. Initial testing targeted 100 curated epilepsy genes for sequence and copy number analysis in 151 children with idiopathic epilepsy referred consecutively by neurologists. Additional genetic testing options were offered afterward.ExposuresClinical genetic testing.Main outcomes and measuresMolecular diagnostic findings.ResultsOf 151 patients (84 boys [55.6%]; median age, 4.2 years [interquartile range, 1.4-8.7 years]), 16 children (10.6%; 95% CI, 6%-16%) received a diagnosis after initial panel analysis. Parental testing for 15 probands with inconclusive results revealed de novo variants in 7 individuals (46.7%), resulting in an overall diagnostic yield of 15.3% (23 of 151; 95% CI, 9%-21%). Twelve probands with nondiagnostic panel findings were reflexed to exome sequencing, and 4 were diagnostic (33.3%; 95% CI, 6%-61%), raising the overall diagnostic yield to 17.9% (27 of 151; 95% CI, 12%-24%). The yield was highest (17 of 44 [38.6%; 95% CI, 24%-53%]) among probands with epilepsy onset in infancy (age, 1-12 months). Panel diagnostic findings involved 16 genes: SCN1A (n = 4), PRRT2 (n = 3), STXBP1 (n = 2), IQSEC2 (n = 2), ATP1A2, ATP1A3, CACNA1A, GABRA1, KCNQ2, KCNT1, SCN2A, SCN8A, DEPDC5, TPP1, PCDH19, and UBE3A (all n = 1). Exome sequencing analysis identified 4 genes: SMC1A, SETBP1, NR2F1, and TRIT1. For the remaining 124 patients, analysis of 13 additional genes implicated in epilepsy since the panel was launched in 2016 revealed promising findings in 6 patients.Conclusions and relevanceExome-based targeted panels appear to enable rapid analysis of a preselected set of genes while retaining flexibility in gene content. Successive genetic workup should include parental testing of select probands with inconclusive results and reflex to whole-exome trio analysis for the remaining nondiagnostic cases. Periodic reanalysis is needed to capture information in newly identified disease genes.
| S-EPMC6481455 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe evaluated changes in genetic testing for neonatal-onset epilepsy and associated short-term outcomes over an 8-year period among a cohort of patients in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at a single institution before and after the introduction of sponsored genetic epilepsy testing in January 2018.MethodsOur primary outcome was a change in length of stay (LOS) after 2018. We also ascertained severity of illness with the Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (nSOFA), type and result of genetic testing, turnaround time to molecular diagnosis (TAT), LOS, antiseizure medications (ASMs), and use of technology at discharge. We compared outcomes using nonparametric tests and difference-in-difference analysis.ResultsFifty-three infants with genetic testing were included; 20 infants were tested after 2018. A total of 4160 infants in the NICU without genetic testing were used as reference. In the genetic testing group, LOS was 25 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5, 49) pre-2018 and 19 days (IQR 6, 19) post-2018 (P < 0.001 when compared with the reference population in the difference-in-difference analysis). TAT decreased from 51 days to 17 days after 2018 (P = 0.003). ASM number decreased from 4 (IQR 2, 5) to 2 post-2018 (IQR 1, 3) (P = 0.02). Over the same time periods there was no significant change in birth weight, maximum nSOFA score, or technology dependence.ConclusionsIn this cohort, changes in genetic testing for neonatal-onset epilepsy were associated with shorter LOS that was not explained by changes in severity of illness, birth weight, or the average LOS in the NICU over time. Validation of these results in a larger, multicenter sample size is warranted.
| S-EPMC9484310 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genetic testing is used for screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of diseases consistent with a genetic cause and to guide drug therapy to improve drug efficacy and avoid adverse effects (pharmacogenomics). This In Practice review aims to inform about DNA-related genetic test availability, interpretation, and recommended clinical actions based on results using evidence from clinical guidelines, when available. We discuss challenges that limit the widespread use of genetic information in the clinical care setting, including a small number of actionable genetic variants with strong evidence of clinical validity and utility, and the need for improving the health literacy of health care providers and the public, including for direct-to-consumer tests. Ethical, legal, and social issues and incidental findings also need to be addressed. Because our understanding of genetic factors associated with disease and drug response is rapidly increasing and new genetic tests are being developed that could be adopted by clinicians in the short term, we also provide extensive resources for information and education on genetic testing.
| S-EPMC6153053 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Diagnostic yield of epilepsy panel testing of patients with seizure onset within the first year of life
| PRJEB26566 | ENA