Dataset Information

Comparison of Different Irrigants in the Removal of Endotoxins and Cultivable Microorganisms from Infected Root Canals.

ABSTRACT: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of different irrigants used to remove endotoxins and cultivable microorganisms during endodontic therapy. Forty root canals were contaminated and divided into groups according to the irrigant: 2% NaOCl + surfactant, 2% CHX, 2.5% NaOCl, and pyrogen-free saline solution (control). Samples were collected after root canal contamination (S1), after instrumentation (S2), and 7 days after instrumentation (S3). Microorganisms and endotoxins were recovered from 100% of the contaminated root canals (S1). At S2, 2% NaOCl + surfactant, 2% CHX, and 2.5% NaOCl were able to completely eliminate cultivable microorganisms. At S3, both 2% CHX and 2.5% NaOCl were effective in preventing C. albicans and E. coli regrowth, but E. faecalis was still detected. No microorganism species was recovered from root canals instrumented with 2% NaOCl + surfactant. At S2, a higher percentage value of endotoxin reduction was found for 2% NaOCl + surfactant (99.3%) compared to 2% CHX (98.9%) and 2.5% NaOCl (97.18%) (p < 0.05). Moreover, at S3, 2% NaOCl + surfactant (100%) was the most effective irrigant against endotoxins. All irrigants tested were effective in reducing microorganisms and endotoxins from root canals. Moreover, 2% NaOCl + surfactant was the most effective irrigant against endotoxins and regrowth of microorganisms.

SUBMITTER: Valera MC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4546762 | biostudies-other | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction: Enterococcus faecalis is a resistant bacterium which is the most abundant species in infected root canals. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a method for killing the bacteria with active Oxygen radicals generated in a photosensitizer when exposed to centralized light. Furthermore, as a new method of canal disinfection, a variety of irrigation activation systems have been introduced, one of which is GentleFile (GF) with rotary movements and spiral effects for antibacterial action. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the two mentioned methods when used with and without Sodium Hypochlorite in eliminating E. faecalis from infected root canals. Methods: Fifty-eight uniradicular teeth were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups of 14. Two specimens were selected for later scanning electron microscopy in order to screen the procedure steps. In each experimental group, 10 samples were selected to be treated with GF or PDT; 3 of them were selected as positive controls and the other one sample was chosen as a negative control. Experimental groups were as follows: (1) Irrigation activation system, (2) Irrigation activation system + sodium hypochlorite, (3) PDT, and (4) PDT+ sodium hypochlorite. The specimens were then cultured for a bacterial colony count. Results: The decrease in the bacterial count after the treatment with the irrigation activation system was 99.8% (P =0.011) and when the system was used with sodium hypochlorite, it was 100% (P =0.001). The antibacterial effect of PDT was 90.08% (P =0.011) and it was 99.7% when PDT was combined with sodium hypochlorite (P =0.011). Conclusion: All four methods can be administered as complementary methods in root canal disinfection. According to the results of disinfection in the experimental groups of current study it is concluded that integration of new technologies such as activation irrigation system or PDT in Combination with NaOCl ameliorates disinfection of root canal and can provide several advantages in the endodontic outcome.

Project description:Ultraviolet C (UVC) light emitting diode (LED) can kill the endodontic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis and has the potential to kill other oral microorganisms associated with endodontic infections. This same bacteriocidal device shows great promise in the stimulation of periapical healing and pain reduction resulting from inflammation in root canals. Previously, we found that 255 nm UVC LED killed E. faecalis and induced the production of cellular biomarkers in HEPM cells and gingival fibroblasts (Morio et al., 2019). Here, we extend those findings and hypothesize that UVC LED at other wavelengths and power levels kill microorganisms associated with root canal infections. Units emitting UVC LED at 265 nm (12 mW), 265 nm (22.5 mW), and 280 nm (8 mW) wavelenths were assembled and the energy levels of their emissions were measured. The energy doses in millijoules (mJ) were calculated from the power readings of the meter (µW) × time of exposure (seconds). Ex vivo models of root canals were prepared in extracted, instrumented, single canal human premolars. Five cultures of microorganisms were treated with 265 nm (12 mW), 265 nm (22.5 mW), or 280 nm (8 mW) UVC LED on discs in laboratory assays and 4 cultures of microorganisms were treated with 265 nm (22.5 mW) UVC LED in root canals of extracted, instrumented teeth. After UVC LED treatment, all microorganisms were cultivated on microbiological media. Colony forming units (CFU) of viable microorganisms treated with UVC LED were counted and compared with those of viable microorganisms not treated with UVC LED as controls. Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference was used to determine statistical significances (0.05). Units emitting UVC LED at 265 nm (12 mW), 265 nm (22.5 mW), and 280 nm (8 mW) killed Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), E. faecalis, and Streptococcus sanguinis after 30-90 seconds of exposure in laboratory assays (p < 0.05). Microbial killing differed among treatment times, UVC LED wavelengths, power levels of each unit, and specific microorganism. The unit emitting UVC LED at 265 nm (22.5 mW) killed C. albicans, S. aureus, MRSA, and E. faecalis in 30 s in root canals of extracted, instrumented teeth (p < 0.05). This dataset can be reused to assess the ability of other wavelengths and power levels to kill microorganisms as well as improve procedures for treating endodontic infections and inflammation in root canals.

Project description:BackgroundXP-Endo Finisher (XPF) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) are commonly used in intracanal medicament removal. The effectiveness of these two techniques needs to be compared, and evidence-based research should be conducted.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to December 20th, 2020. The outcomes of the included trials were pooled into the Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager 5.3 software. Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool 2.0 was applied to assess the risk of bias.ResultsNine articles were included in this systematic review and processed for data extraction, and eight studies were identified for meta-analysis. In general, the use of PUI showed better medicament removal effectiveness than XPF (odds ratio [OR]: 3.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96-4.86; P < 0.001). PUI was also significantly more efficient than XPF in the apical third (OR: 3.42; 95% CI, 1.32-8.84; P = 0.01). For trials using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) alone, PUI was also significantly more effective than XPF on intracanal medicaments removal (OR: 5.23; 95% CI, 2.79-9.82; P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between PUI and XPF when NaOCl and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were used in combination (OR: 1.51; 95% CI, 0.74-3.09; P = 0.26). In addition, for studies whose intracanal medicament periods were two weeks, the effectiveness of PUI was statistically better than the XPF (OR: 7.73; 95% CI, 3.71-16.07; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, for trials whose intracanal medicament time was one week or over two weeks, no differences between the XPF and PUI were found (OR: 1.54; 95% CI, 0.74-3.22; P = 0.25) (OR: 1.42; 95% CI, 0.44-4.61; P = 0.56).ConclusionsThe meta-analysis is the first study to quantitatively compare the effectiveness of XPF and PUI techniques on intracanal medicaments removal. With rigorous eligibility criteria, the study only included high-quality randomised controlled trials. The study indicated that PUI might be superior over XPF techniques for removing intracanal medicaments from artificial standardized grooves and cavities in the root canal system. The anatomical areas, irrigation protocol, and intracanal medicaments time may influence the cleaning efficacy.

Dataset Information

Comparison of Different Irrigants in the Removal of Endotoxins and Cultivable Microorganisms from Infected Root Canals.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets