Dataset Information

Surgical Anatomy of the Uncinate Process and Transverse Foramen Determined by Computed Tomography.

ABSTRACT: Study Design Computed tomography-based cohort study. Objective Although there are publications concerning the relationship between the vertebral artery and uncinate process, there is no practical guide detailing the dimensions of this region to use during decompression of the intervertebral foramen. The purpose of this study is to determine the anatomic parameters that can be used as a guide for thorough decompression of the intervertebral foramen. Methods Fifty-one patients with three-dimensional computed tomography scans of the cervical spine from 2003 to 2012 were included. On axial views, we measured the distance from the midline to the medial and lateral cortices of the pedicle bilaterally from C3 to C7. On coronal reconstructed views, we measured the minimum height of the uncinate process from the cranial cortex of the pedicle adjacent to the posterior cortex of vertebral body and the maximal height of the uncinate process from the cranial cortex of the pedicle at the midportion of the vertebral body bilaterally from C3 to C7. Results The mean distances from midline to the medial and lateral cortices of the pedicle were 10.1 ± 1.3 mm and 13.9 ± 1.5 mm, respectively. The mean minimum height of the uncinate process from the cranial cortex of the pedicle was 4.6 ± 1.6 mm and the mean maximal height was 6.1 ± 1.7 mm. Conclusions Our results suggest that in most cases, one can thoroughly decompress the intervertebral foramen by removing the uncinate out to 13 mm laterally from the midline and 4 mm above the pedicle without violating the transverse foramen.

SUBMITTER: Park MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4577317 | biostudies-other | 2015 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThree-dimensional (3-D) volume rendering has been shown to improve visualization in general surgery. Cinematic rendering (CR), a novel 3-D visualization technology for postprocessing of computed tomographaphy (CT) images, provides photorealistic images with the potential to improve visualization of anatomic details.ObjectiveTo determine the value of CR for the comprehension of the surgical anatomy.Design, setting, and participantsThis preclinical, randomized, 2-sequence crossover study was conducted from February to November 1, 2018, at University Hospital of Erlangen, Germany. The 40 patient cases were evaluated by 18 resident and attending surgeons using a prepared set of CT and CR images. The patient cases were randomized to 2 assessment sequences (CR-CT and CT-CR). During each assessment period, participants answered 1 question per case that addressed crucial issues of anatomic understanding, preoperative planning, and intraoperative strategies. After a washout period of 2 weeks, case evaluations were crossed over to the respective second image modality.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome measure was the correctness of answers. Secondary outcome was the time needed to answer.ResultsThe mean (SD) interperiod differences for the percentage of correct answers in the CR-CT sequence (8.5% [7.0%]) differed significantly from those in the CT-CR sequence (-13.1% [6.3%]) (P < .001). The mean (SD) interperiod differences for the time spent to answer the questions in the CR-CT sequence (-18.3 [76.9] seconds) also differed significantly from those in the CT-CR sequence (52.4 [88.5] seconds) (P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that residents as well as attending physicians benefitted from CR visualization. Analysis of the case assessment questionnaire showed that CR added significant value to the comprehension of the surgical anatomy (overall mean [SD] score, 4.53 [0.75]). No carryover or period effects were observed.Conclusions and relevanceThe visualization with CR allowed a more correct and faster comprehension of the surgical anatomy compared with conventional CT imaging, independent of level of surgeon experience. Therefore, CR may assist general surgeons with preoperative preparation and intraoperative guidance.

Project description:PurposeThe aim of this systematic review is to assess whether the anatomy of mental foramen is precisely evaluable with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) before implantation in humans.MethodsA systematic review was carried out to evaluate the anatomy of mental foramen (size, position, symmetry, anterior loop, and accessory mental foramen or multiple mental foramina). According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, an electronic search of three databases (Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was undertaken until June 2020 and was supplemented by manual searching. Two reviewers will independently perform the processes of study inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment. Systematic reviews, studies about children, and case reports were excluded. Only studies using CBCT to do preoperative evaluation were selected.ResultsFrom 728 potentially eligible articles, 72 were included in the qualitative analysis and quantitative synthesis. This systematic review provided an assessment of the anatomy of the mental foramen. The mental foramen was located mostly between the two premolars (between 50.4% and 61.95%) or apically to the second premolar (from 50.3% to 57.9%). The mean diameter of the mental foramen was bigger in males than in females; the difference between them could reach 0.62 mm. The anterior loop seemed to be longer in males (between 0.87 ± 1.81 and 7.25 ± 2.02 mm) than in females (between 0.81 ± 1.18 and 6.52 ± 1.63 mm) and with the presence of teeth (from 0.91 ± 1.18 to 2.55 ± 1.28 for dentate people and from 0.25 ± 0.61 to 2.40 ± 0.88 mm for edentate population). The anterior loop and the accessory mental foramina were detected more frequently with CBCT than panoramic X-ray: only between 0.0 and 48.6% AMFs detected with CBCT were also seen with panoramic images. Clinical Significance. The mental foramen (MF) is an important landmark for local anesthesia and surgical and implantology procedures. Its location, morphology, and anatomical variations need to be considered to avoid mental nerve injury. The aim of this review is to evaluate the mental foramen using CBCT through a systematic literature review to improve knowledge of this complex area for the clinician.

Project description:ImportanceThere is no imaging standard to model nasal cartilage for the planning of rhinoplasty procedures. Preoperative visualization of cartilage may improve objective evaluation of nasal deformities, surgical planning, and surgical reconstruction.ObjectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of visualizing nasal cartilage using high resolution micro-computed tomography (CT) compared with the criterion standard of pathologic findings in a cadaveric specimen and to evaluate its accuracy compared with various clinical CT protocols.Design, setting, and participantsAnatomic study at the University of Washington using single human cadaveric nasal specimens performed from July 10, 2017, to March 30, 2018.InterventionsA micro-CT acquisition with 60-micron resolution was obtained of a nasal specimen. The specimen was then scanned with 5 different clinical CT protocols to span both clinical care and machine limits. The specimen was then sectioned in 5-mm axial slices for pathologic analysis.Main outcomes and measuresMicro-CT images were registered to pathologic specimen cross-sections using a graphite fiducial system. Cartilage substructures were manually segmented and analyzed. A library of matched images across the micro-CT and various clinical CT protocols was then developed. Region of interest analysis was performed for each of the cartilage structures and their boundaries on clinical CT protocols and micro-CT, with the outcome of mean (SD) density using Hounsfield units.ResultsA single human cadaveric nasal specimen was used to obtain the following results. Lower lateral cartilage, upper lateral cartilage, and septal cartilage were accurately delineated on the micro-CT images compared with pathologic findings. The mean absolute deviation from pathologic findings was 0.30 mm for septal cartilage thickness, 0.98 mm for maximal upper lateral cartilage length, and 1.40 mm for maximal lower lateral cartilage length. On clinical CT protocols, only septal cartilage was well discriminated from boundary. Higher radiation dose resulted in more accurate density measurements of cartilage, but it did not ultimately improve ability to discriminate cartilage.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this anatomic study may represent a notable step toward advancing knowledge of the capabilities and pitfalls of nasal cartilage visualization on CT. Nasal cartilage visualization was feasible on the micro-CT compared with pathologic findings. Future research may further examine the barriers to accurately visualizing upper lateral cartilage and lower lateral cartilage, a prerequisite for clinical application.Level of evidenceNA.

Dataset Information

Surgical Anatomy of the Uncinate Process and Transverse Foramen Determined by Computed Tomography.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets