Dysphagia Secondary to Anterior Osteophytes of the Cervical Spine.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Egerter AC
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4577331 | biostudies-other | 2015 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:Introductionand importance: Forestier's disease, also known as a vertebral ankylosing hyperostosis or Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH), is a non-inflammatory enthesopathy that affects primarily elderly males and ossifies the anterolateral spine while sparing the intervertebral discs and joint spaces, especially at the cervical spine. Forestier's disease has resulted in the growth of large anterior cervical osteophytes that may compress the pharyngoesophageal region, producing dysphagia. However, symptomatic Forestier's disease presenting with dysphagia and cervical myelopathy is rarely observed.Case presentationA 48-year-old male presented with progressive dysphagia and cervical myelopathy. Based on the presence of radiographic study, Forestier's disease was suspected. Large anterior cervical osteophytes at C4-C6 levels compressed the pharyngoesophageal structure posteriorly. Multilevel degenerative discs compressing the C4 to C6 spinal cord were also seen on sagittal MRI T2-weighted images. Anterior cervical osteophytectomy with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) were performed. The patient made a complete neurological recovery and had no recurrent symptoms at the 5-year follow-up. The patient was extremely satisfied with this treatment and can improved his quality of life (QOL).Clinical discussionTreatment of symptomatic Forestier's disease with secondary dysphagia and cervical myelopathy is rare evidenced by the dearth of reports on surgical treatment. Surgical intervention appears to be safe, effective, and able to halt disease progression.ConclusionAnterior cervical osteophytectomy combined with ACDF with plate fixation is a preferred technique in both neural decompression and swallowing improvement. Surgical intervention, we consider, provides superior results than prolonged non-surgical treatments.
| S-EPMC8637186 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Study Design Review. Objective Postoperative oropharyngeal dysphagia is one of the most common complications following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). We review and summarize recent literature in order to provide a general overview of clinical signs and symptoms, assessment, incidence and natural history, pathophysiology, risk factors, treatment, prevention, and topics for future research. Methods A search of English literature regarding dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. The search was focused on articles published since the last review on this topic was published in 2005. Results Patients who develop dysphagia after ACSS show significant alterations in swallowing biomechanics. Patient history, physical examination, X-ray, direct or indirect laryngoscopy, and videoradiographic swallow evaluation are considered the primary modalities for evaluating oropharyngeal dysphagia. There is no universally accepted objective instrument for assessing dysphagia after ACSS, but the most widely used instrument is the Bazaz Dysphagia Score. Because dysphagia is a subjective sensation, patient-reported instruments appear to be more clinically relevant and more effective in identifying dysfunction. The causes of oropharyngeal dysphagia after ACSS are multifactorial, involving neuronal, muscular, and mucosal structures. The condition is usually transient, most often beginning in the immediate postoperative period but sometimes beginning more than 1 month after surgery. The incidence of dysphagia within one week after ACSS varies from 1 to 79% in the literature. This wide variance can be attributed to variations in surgical techniques, extent of surgery, and size of the implant used, as well as variations in definitions and measurements of dysphagia, time intervals of postoperative evaluations, and relatively small sample sizes used in published studies. The factors most commonly associated with an increased risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia after ACSS are: more levels operated, female gender, increased operative time, and older age (usually >60 years). Dysphagic patients can learn compensatory strategies for the safe and effective passage of bolus material. Certain intraoperative and postoperative techniques may decrease the incidence and/or severity of oropharyngeal dysphagia after ACSS. Conclusions Large, prospective, randomized studies are required to confirm the incidence, prevalence, etiology, mechanisms, long-term natural history, and risk factors for the development of dysphagia after ACSS, as well as to identify prevention measures. Also needed is a universal outcome measurement that is specific, reliable and valid, would include global, functional, psychosocial, and physical domains, and would facilitate comparisons among studies. Results of these studies can lead to improvements in surgical techniques and/or perioperative management, and may reduce the incidence of dysphagia after ACSS.
| S-EPMC3854602 | biostudies-other
Project description:BACKGROUND:Anterior cervical spine surgery is often associated with postoperative dysphagia, but chronic dysphagia caused by laryngo-vertebral synostosis is extremely rare. We report a case of chronic dysphagia caused by synostosis between the cricoid cartilage and cervical spine after anterior surgery for cervical spine trauma. CASE PRESENTATIONS:We present a case of a 39-year-old man who had sustained complex spine trauma at C5-6 associated with complete spinal cord injury at the age of 22; the patient presented with a 5-year history of chronic dysphagia. Computed tomography demonstrated posterior shift of the esophagus as well as calcification of the cricoid cartilage and its fusion to the right anterior tubercle of the C5 vertebra. A barium swallow study demonstrated significant barium aspiration into the airway and no laryngeal elevation. The patient underwent resection of the bony bridge and omohyoid muscle flap insertion. His symptoms ameliorated after surgery. CONCLUSION:Synostosis between the cricoid cartilage and cervical spine may occur associated with cervical spine trauma and causes chronic dysphagia. Resection of the fused part can improve dysphagia caused by this rare condition and omohyoid muscle flap might be a good option to prevent recurrence.
| S-EPMC7057656 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Dysphagia is one of the most common complications of surgical procedures in the anterior cervical spine, and can persist up to 2 years postoperatively. Corticosteroids are relatively safe and inexpensive for treating various inflammatory conditions. Perioperative corticosteroid administration for anterior cervical spine procedures may effectively minimize postoperative dysphagia, potentially leading to better outcomes, decreased readmission rates, and improved patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of perioperative corticosteroids in decreasing the severity and duration of dysphagia following single-level and multilevel anterior cervical spine procedures. METHODS:Seventy-four patients undergoing elective anterior cervical surgical procedures for degenerative conditions were recruited. Patients with prior cervical procedures; with a diagnosis of fracture, malignancy, or infection; or requiring combined anterior-posterior procedures were excluded. Patients were randomized to perioperative intravenous dexamethasone or saline solution. Doses were administered before incision and at 8 and 16 hours postoperatively. Investigators and patients were blinded to the treatment throughout the study. Dysphagia outcomes were assessed with use of the Bazaz dysphagia scale and the Dysphagia Short Questionnaire (DSQ) at 1 day, 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed comparing means and standard deviations; significance was set at p < 0.05. Clinical outcomes were measured with use of the Quality of Life-12 and Neck Disability Index. RESULTS:Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis. There were 49 anterior cervical discectomies and fusions, 8 corpectomies, 1 hybrid procedure (corpectomy and adjacent discectomy), and 6 single-level arthroplasties. Patients who received corticosteroids had significantly better dysphagia scores on both the Bazaz scale and DSQ at most time points up to 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). On subgroup analysis, patients with multilevel (?2-level) fusion benefited significantly from corticosteroids on both scales, whereas those with single-level procedures did not. There were no short-term wound complications or infections, and length of stay and fusion rates were comparable. CONCLUSIONS:Perioperative administration of corticosteroids can reduce dysphagia symptoms following multilevel anterior cervical procedures. Benefit was noted immediately and up to 6 months postoperatively. There was no significant effect on short-term wound-healing, infection rates, length of stay, or fusion rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
| S-EPMC7508280 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a condition characterized by the calcification and ossification of the ligaments of the cervical spine; in some cases, it may result in dysphagia. The condition is more common in men over 50 years of age with metabolic disorders, and it is often asymptomatic and not a major issue for patients. The etiology of DISH is poorly understood, and known genetic factors indicate multiple signal pathways and multigene inheritance. In this review, we discuss the epidemiological, clinical, and etiological aspects of DISH with a special focus on dysphagia.
| S-EPMC8074005 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction:Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis of cervical spine can lead to dysphagia. Presentation of case:A 73-year-old male weighing 110 kg and diagnosed with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in cervical spine with dysphagia. Patient manifested local pain of neck, a gradual limitation of spinal mobility. The surgery decision was based on swallowing problems, not pain in the spine. Before surgery radiographs, magnetic resonance images, computed tomography of the cervical spine and gastroscopy were obtained. Osteophytes were removed from the anterior approach with present otolaryngologist by surgery. Discussion:In this case used gastroscopy, CT and MRI for diagnostics. During the procedure we had support otolaryngologist. The patient has not been found a stenosis spinal canal and neurological symptoms. We were removed the ostheophytes. Interbody implants have not been applied. Conclusion:Disc degeneration disease itself can be asymptomatic or not a dominant problem for the DISH patients. Clinical signs may pharyngoesophageal and tracheal compression, causing dysphagia, shortness of breath and stridor. In this case, the cervical spine was stability and not demonstrated a stenosis in the spinal canal. Isolate removing of the osteophytes without implants in DISH of cervical spine can be enough solution.
| S-EPMC7369420 | biostudies-literature
Project description:When surgically treating cervical degenerative disc disease, the most commonly performed procedure is anterior cervical discectomy. This procedure is performed with, or without fusion promoting methods. For both options the rate of fusion is high and there is much debate whether fusion of the treated segment is a contributing factor to accelerated degeneration of adjacent motion segments. In an effort to prevent degeneration of adjacent segments (ASDeg) due to loss of mobility at the operated level, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was introduced. To evaluate the effectiveness of CDA in preventing ASDeg long term studies are necessary. However, prevention of ASDeg is based on the premise that mobile disc prostheses preserve cervical spine motion in a physiological way. In this article the authors describe a short term protocol for a study that aims to investigate whether CDA reaches the intended goal: restoration or preservation of physiological cervical spine motion. To this end, a technique is used to establish the sequence of contributions of cervical motion segments to flexion/extension of the spine.24 subjects between 18 and 55 years old, with radicular symptoms due to a herniated disc between C5 and C7, refractory to conservative therapy are randomized to simple discectomy, or CDA. These groups are preceded by a pilot group of three subjects receiving CDA. Fluoroscopic flexion-extension recordings are acquired preoperatively, and at three and 12 months postoperative. At these same time points, patient reported outcomes are collected, and a neurological examination is performed by and independent physician.Studies investigating arthroplasty determine mobility by measuring segmental range of motion (sROM), which gives no information other than presence, and quantity, of mobility. SROM suffer from high variability. The authors therefore chose to use a method previously used in healthy controls, to describe the dynamic process of cervical spine motion in more detail. Determining cervical spine motion patterns has been reported to be more consistent than sROM. If a physiological motion pattern is absent after surgery in the CDA group, prevention of future ASDeg is less likely. Radiological outcomes will be correlated to clinical outcomes.NCT00868335.
| S-EPMC4349598 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We aimed to identify independent psychological predictors of quality of life (QOL) and functional outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine disease. We prospectively included patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical disc herniation and stenosis. Patients completed a structured psychological assessment including the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (ADS-K), Post-Traumatic Stress Scale-10 (PTSS-10), State Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Anxiety and - Trait Anxiety (STAI-S and STAI-T) and Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3) before surgery, after 3 and 12 months. Outcome measures included EuroQol-5D (EQ), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Of 104 included patients who underwent ACDF between March 2013 and November 2017, 92 completed follow-up after 3 and 12 months. The mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for neck pain (- 1.4; p?<?.001) and arm pain (- 1.8; p?=?.031) significantly decreased by 12 months. QOL scores significantly increased by 3 months (EQ:?+?0.2; p?<?.001; SF-36 PCS:?+?6.2; p?<?.001; SF-36 MCS:?+?2.5; p?=?.044), a benefit which was retained at 12 months. Linear regression analyses identified statistically significant predictors in preoperative ASI-3, SF-36 MCS and STAI-S for postoperative QOL and ODI scores. There is a benefit for patients in terms of quality of life and function after undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease. With the ASI-3, SF-36 MCS and STAI-S there exist some predictors for postoperative QOL and ODI scores.
| S-EPMC7414876 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionAuthors aim to demonstrate the surgical technique and outcomes of using a platysma sparing approach to anterior cervical spine surgery.MethodsMedical records of 496 prospective patients, group 1 (259 patients) with an outpatient platysma muscle-sparing approach. Group 2 (237 patients) with inpatient standard muscle-splitting approach.ResultsIntergroup comparison showed statistical significant improvement in VAS neck and NDI scores p = 0.009 and p = 0.012 and surgical operative time and estimated blood loss, p = 0.003 and p = 0.006 respectively.ConclusionThis anatomy sparing technique demonstrates a safe, effective and reproducible approach to cervical spine surgery which is a goal of less exposure surgery philosophy.
| S-EPMC6807304 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAnterior cervical fusion offers surgeons a safe and reliable surgical option for single-level and multilevel pathology; however, multilevel fusions pose a higher risk of complications than single-level fusions, including possible pseudoarthrosis, adjacent segment disease, sagittal imbalance, and construct subsidence. Various techniques can be used to mitigate risk in multilevel anterior cervical fusion.Questions/purposesWe reviewed the literature to determine the best surgical strategies in multilevel anterior cervical fusion.MethodsWe searched the PubMed database for articles published from January 1980 through July 2019. Two authors identified relevant articles and then manually screened them for others to include in this review.ResultsWe initially identified 1936 articles and included 48 in our review. We found that clinical outcomes of multilevel anterior cervical fusion can be optimized through the use of biologics and graft selection, the evaluation of pre-existing deformity, the assessment of comorbidities, and the selection of fusion levels. Meticulous surgical technique in conjunction with modern surgical tools, such as instrumentation and biologics, allow surgeons to address complex cervical problems while limiting morbidity and enhancing clinical outcomes.ConclusionsMultilevel anterior cervical fusions offer a relatively safe and reliable treatment option for both single-level and multilevel pathology.
| S-EPMC7253572 | biostudies-literature