Dataset Information

Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.

ABSTRACT: The correction of intensity non-uniformity (INU) in magnetic resonance (MR) images is extremely important to ensure both within-subject and across-subject reliability. Here we tackled the problem of objectively comparing INU correction techniques for T1-weighted images, which are the most commonly used in structural brain imaging. We focused our investigations on the methods integrated in widely used software packages for MR data analysis: FreeSurfer, BrainVoyager, SPM and FSL. We used simulated data to assess the INU fields reconstructed by those methods for controlled inhomogeneity magnitudes and noise levels. For each method, we evaluated a wide range of input parameters and defined an enhanced configuration associated with best reconstruction performance. By comparing enhanced and default configurations, we found that the former often provide much more accurate results. Accordingly, we used enhanced configurations for a more objective comparison between methods. For different levels of INU magnitude and noise, SPM and FSL, which integrate INU correction with brain segmentation, generally outperformed FreeSurfer and BrainVoyager, whose methods are exclusively dedicated to INU correction. Nonetheless, accurate INU field reconstructions can be obtained with FreeSurfer on images with low noise and with BrainVoyager for slow and smooth inhomogeneity profiles. Our study may prove helpful for an accurate selection of the INU correction method to be used based on the characteristics of actual MR data.

SUBMITTER: Ganzetti M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4706843 | biostudies-other | 2016 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.

Ganzetti Marco M Wenderoth Nicole N Mantini Dante D

Neuroinformatics 20160101 1

The correction of intensity non-uniformity (INU) in magnetic resonance (MR) images is extremely important to ensure both within-subject and across-subject reliability. Here we tackled the problem of objectively comparing INU correction techniques for T1-weighted images, which are the most commonly used in structural brain imaging. We focused our investigations on the methods integrated in widely used software packages for MR data analysis: FreeSurfer, BrainVoyager, SPM and FSL. We used simulated ...[more]

PMID: 26306865

Similar Datasets

Project description:Structural MR images concomitantly acquired with PET images can provide crucial anatomic information for precise quantitative analysis. However, in the clinical setting, not all the subjects have corresponding MR images. Here, we developed a model to generate structural MR images from amyloid PET using deep generative networks. We applied our model to quantification of cortical amyloid load without structural MR. Methods: We used florbetapir PET and structural MR data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. The generative network was trained to generate realistic structural MR images from florbetapir PET images. After the training, the model was applied to the quantification of cortical amyloid load. PET images were spatially normalized to the template space using the generated MR, and then SUV ratio (SUVR) of the target regions was measured by predefined regions of interest. A real MR-based quantification was used as the gold standard to measure the accuracy of our approach. Other MR-less methods-a normal PET template-based, a multiatlas PET template-based, and a PET segmentation-based normalization/quantification-were also tested. We compared the performance of quantification methods using generated MR with that of MR-based and MR-less quantification methods. Results: Generated MR images from florbetapir PET showed signal patterns that were visually similar to the real MR. The structural similarity index between real and generated MR was 0.91 ± 0.04. The mean absolute error of SUVR of cortical composite regions estimated by the generated MR-based method was 0.04 ± 0.03, which was significantly smaller than other MR-less methods (0.29 ± 0.12 for the normal PET template, 0.12 ± 0.07 for the multiatlas PET template, and 0.08 ± 0.06 for the PET segmentation-based methods). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the generated MR-based SUVR quantification was the closest to the SUVRs estimated by the real MR-based method. Conclusion: Structural MR images were successfully generated from amyloid PET images using deep generative networks. Generated MR images could be used as templates for accurate and precise amyloid quantification. This generative method might be used to generate multimodal images of various organs for further quantitative analyses.

Dataset Information

Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.

Publications

Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets