Dataset Information

Comprehensive long-term care of patients with lung cancer: development of a novel thoracic survivorship program.

ABSTRACT: Recent advances have improved the likelihood of long-term survival for patients with lung cancer. However, little attention has been given to the growing need for dedicated survivorship care for these patients. To address this unmet need, we developed a unique follow-up care model.In 2006, we convened a multidisciplinary working group to design a thoracic survivorship program (TSP) that provides follow-up by a nurse practitioner (NP) trained in survivorship care. Patients with early-stage lung cancer who were disease free for at least 1 year after resection were eligible for the program, which incorporates a standardized approach to cancer surveillance. Data on symptoms and outcomes were prospectively collected. Real-time electronic medical documentation was developed to optimize communication with primary physicians.Data were analyzed for the initial phase of the program, which comprised 655 patients. Ninety-two percent of eligible survivors who remained disease free chose to continue their care in the TSP, rather than receive follow-up with their thoracic surgeon. Clinically significant posttreatment symptoms were common, including fatigue (46%), anxiety (32%), chronic pain (25%), dyspnea (14%), and depression (12%). The majority of recurrences (72%) and second primary cancers (91%) in this cohort were identified by scheduled chest computed tomography at TSP visits.Survivorship care for patients with lung cancer, delivered in our NP-led TSP, is feasible, effective, and well accepted by patients. Through the implementation of a uniform self-sustaining patient-centered system, the TSP model improves on the variation of physician-led follow-up care.

SUBMITTER: Huang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4713027 | biostudies-other | 2014 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comprehensive long-term care of patients with lung cancer: development of a novel thoracic survivorship program.

Huang James J Logue Amy E AE Ostroff Jamie S JS Park Bernard J BJ McCabe Mary M Jones David R DR Bains Manjit S MS Rizk Nabil P NP Kris Mark G MG Rusch Valerie W VW

The Annals of thoracic surgery 20140731 3

<h4>Background</h4>Recent advances have improved the likelihood of long-term survival for patients with lung cancer. However, little attention has been given to the growing need for dedicated survivorship care for these patients. To address this unmet need, we developed a unique follow-up care model.<h4>Methods</h4>In 2006, we convened a multidisciplinary working group to design a thoracic survivorship program (TSP) that provides follow-up by a nurse practitioner (NP) trained in survivorship car ...[more]

PMID: 25087931

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveWe developed a novel, nurse practitioner-run Thoracic Survivorship Program to aid in long-term follow-up. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were disease-free at least 1 year after resection could be referred to the Thoracic Survivorship Program by their surgeon. Our objectives were to summarize follow-up compliance and assess long-term outcomes between Thoracic Survivorship Program enrollment and non-Thoracic Survivorship Program.MethodsPatients who underwent R0 resection for stages I to IIIA between 2006 and 2016 were stratified by enrollment in Thoracic Survivorship Program versus surgeon only follow-up (non-Thoracic Survivorship Program). Follow-up included 6-month chest computed tomography scans for 2 years and then annually. Lack of follow-up compliance was defined by 2 or more consecutive delayed annual computed tomography scans/visits ± 90 days. Relationships between Thoracic Survivorship Program and second primary non--small cell lung cancers, extrathoracic cancers, and survival were quantified using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariate reflecting timing of enrollment.ResultsA total of 1162 of 3940 patients (29.5%) were enrolled in the Thoracic Survivorship Program. The median time to enrollment was 2.3 years; 3279 of 3940 (83%) had complete computed tomography scan data, and 60 of 3279 (1.8%) had 2 or more delayed scans; 323 of 9082 (3.6%) non-Thoracic Survivorship Program visits were noncompliant versus 132 of 4823 (2.7%) of Thoracic Survivorship Program visits (P = .009); 136 of 1146 Thoracic Survivorship Program patients developed second primary non-small cell lung cancer, and 69 of 1123 developed extrathoracic cancer, whereas 322 of 2794 of non-Thoracic Survivorship Program patients developed second primary non-small cell lung cancer and 225 of 2817 patients developed extrathoracic cancer. In multivariable analyses, Thoracic Survivorship Program enrollment was associated with improved disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.67; P < .001).ConclusionsOur novel nurse practitioner-run Thoracic Survivorship Program is associated with high patient compliance and outcomes not different from those seen with physician-based follow-up. These results have important implications for health care resource allocation and costs.

Project description:BackgroundLung transplantation (LTx) is a crucial therapeutic strategy for patients suffering from end-stage respiratory diseases, necessitating precise donor-recipient size matching to ensure optimal graft function. While standard allocation protocols rely on predicted lung capacity based on factors such as sex, age, and height, a subset of patients with respiratory diseases presents an additional challenge - thoracic or vertebral deformities. These deformities can complicate accurate volume predictions and may impact the success of lung transplantation.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LTx at Tohoku University Hospital between January 2007 and April 2022, with follow-up until October 2022, the primary objective was to assess the influence of thoracic and vertebral deformities on perioperative complications, emphasizing interventions, such as volume reduction surgery. The secondary objective aimed to identify any noticeable impact on long-term prognoses in recipients with these deformities.ResultsOf 129 LTx recipients analyzed, 17.8% exhibited thoracic deformities, characterized by pectus excavatum, while 16.3% had vertebral deformities. Perioperative complications, requiring delayed chest closure, tracheostomy, and volume reduction surgery, were more prevalent in the deformity group. Thoracic deformities were notably associated with the need for volume reduction surgery. However, long-term prognoses did not differ significantly between patients with deformities and those without. Vertebral deformities did not appear to significantly impact perioperative or long-term outcomes.ConclusionsThis study highlights the prevalence of thoracic deformities in LTx recipients, correlating with increased perioperative complications, particularly the potential need for volume reduction surgery. Importantly, these deformities do not exert a significant impact on long-term prognoses. Additionally, patients with vertebral deformities, such as scoliosis and kyphosis, appear to be manageable in the context of LTx.

Project description:BackgroundTesticular cancer survivors are at risk for cardiovascular disease, often preceded by early development of cardiovascular risk factors due to chemotherapeutic treatment. Therefore, close collaboration between oncologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) is needed during follow-up to monitor and manage cardiovascular risk factors. We designed a shared-care survivorship program, in which testicular cancer patients visit both their oncologist and their PCP. The objective of this study was to test the safety and feasibility of shared-care follow-up after treatment for metastatic testicular cancer.Patients and methodsThe study was designed as an observational cohort study with a stopping rule to check for the safety of follow-up. Safety boundaries were defined for failures in the detection of signals indicating cancer recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of carried out cardiovascular risk assessments, psychosocial status and patient preferences measured with an evaluation questionnaire.ResultsOne hundred and sixty-two patients were enrolled (69% of eligible testicular cancer patients). Almost all (99%, n = 150) PCPs of the enrolled patients agreed to participate in the study. In total, 364 primary care visits took place. No failures occurred in the detection of relapsed testicular cancer. Four follow-up visits were considered as failures because of organizational issues, without activation of the stopping rule. Eventually, the safe boundary was crossed indicating that this shared-care model is a safe alternative for follow-up after testicular cancer. Patients were satisfied with the knowledge level of PCPs. PCPs were willing to further extend their role in follow-up care after cancer.ConclusionsShared-care follow-up is safe and feasible in this patient population. Patients benefit from personalized care, partly close to their home. Within shared care, PCPs can have an important role in cardiovascular risk management and psychosocial survivorship issues.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Hospice care is designed for persons in the final phase of a terminal illness. However, hospice care is not used appropriately. Some persons who do not meet the hospice eligibility receive hospice care, while many persons who may have benefitted from hospice care do not receive it. This study aimed to examine the characteristics of, and one-year survivorship among, residents who received hospice care versus those who did not in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Canada. METHODS:This retrospective cohort study used linked health administrative data from the Canadian Continuing Reporting System (CCRS) and the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD). All persons who resided in a LTCF and who had a Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (RAI-MDS 2.0) assessment in the CCRS database between Jan. 1st, 2015 and Dec 31st, 2015 were included in this study (N?=?185,715). Death records were linked up to Dec 31th, 2016. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS:The reported hospice care rate in LTCFs is critically low (less than 3%), despite one in five residents dying within 3?months of the assessment. Residents who received hospice care and died within 1?year were found to have more severe and complex health conditions than other residents. Compared to those who did not receive hospice care but died within 1?year, residents who received hospice care and were alive 1?year following the assessment were younger (a mean age of 79.4 [+?13.5] years vs. 86.5 [+?9.2] years), more likely to live in an urban LTCF (93.2% vs. 82.6%), had a higher percentage of having a diagnosis of cancer (50.7% vs. 12.9%), had a lower percentage of having a diagnosis of dementia (30.2% vs. 54.5%), and exhibited more severe acute clinical conditions. CONCLUSIONS:The actual use of hospice care among LTCF residents is very poor in Canada. Several factors emerged as potential barriers to hospice use in the LTCF population including ageism, rurality, and a diagnosis of dementia. Improved understanding of hospice use and one-year survivorship may help LTCFs administrators, hospice care providers, and policy makers to improve hospice accessibility in this target group.

Project description:BackgroundThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services launched the 4-year Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (CPC Classic) in 2012 and its 5-year successor, CPC Plus (CPC+), in 2017 to test whether improving primary care delivery in five areas-and providing practices with financial and technical support-reduced spending and improved quality. This is the first study to examine long-term effects of a primary care practice transformation model.ObjectiveTo test whether long-term primary care transformation-the 4-year CPC Classic and the first 2 years of its successor, CPC+-reduced hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and spending over 6 years.DesignWe used a difference-in-differences analysis to compare outcomes for beneficiaries attributed to CPC Classic practices with outcomes for beneficiaries attributed to comparison practices during the year before and 6 years after CPC Classic began.ParticipantsThe study involved 565,674 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries attributed to 502 CPC Classic practices and 1,165,284 beneficiaries attributed to 908 comparison practices, with similar beneficiary-, practice-, and market-level characteristics as the CPC Classic practices.InterventionsThe interventions required primary care practices to improve 5 care areas and supported their transformation with substantially enhanced payment, data feedback, and learning support and, for CPC+, added health information technology support.Main measuresHospitalizations (all-cause), ED visits (outpatient and total), and Medicare Part A and B expenditures.Key resultsRelative to comparison practices, beneficiaries in intervention practices experienced slower growth in hospitalizations-3.1% less in year 5 and 3.5% less in year 6 (P < 0.01) and roughly 2% (P < 0.1) slower growth each year in total ED visits during years 3 through 6. Medicare Part A and B expenditures (excluding care management fees) did not change appreciably.ConclusionsThe emergence of favorable effects on hospitalizations in years 5 and 6 suggests primary care transformation takes time to translate into lower hospitalizations. Longer tests of models are needed.

Dataset Information

Comprehensive long-term care of patients with lung cancer: development of a novel thoracic survivorship program.

Publications

Comprehensive long-term care of patients with lung cancer: development of a novel thoracic survivorship program.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets