Dataset Information

Sonographic examination of the median nerve in dialysis patients and after renal transplantation.

ABSTRACT: Patients with renal insufficiency are predisposed to develop CTS (carpal tunnel syndrome). In particular, long-term dialysis seems to contribute to changes in median nerve texture which lead to an increased risk for CTS. The current study was designed to evaluate if these structural changes can be detected by HRS (high-resolution sonography). Additionally, the current study aimed to determine if changes are reversible after termination of dialysis.Fifty patients (98 hands) were included in the study. The study population was subdivided into three groups: patients without any history of renal disease (H, n = 20), patients with long-term dialysis (D, n = 10), and patients after renal transplantation (TX, n = 20). None of the patients had any clinical symptoms for a median nerve compression syndrome. The CSA (cross-sectional area) of the median nerve was evaluated both 12 cm proximally of the carpal tunnel inlet and directly at the carpal tunnel inlet. The ratio of those two values, the WFR (wrist forearm ratio), was calculated and analyzed.The CSA demonstrated significantly higher values in dialysis (D) and transplanted (TX) patients compared to the healthy (H) control group (P < 0.001). No significant differences were detectable between the D and TX groups. Specifically, there was no significant difference in the WFR.Patients with chronic renal disease demonstrate significantly higher CSA values compared to their healthy counterparts. Termination of dialysis does not seem to reverse these morphological changes.

SUBMITTER: Carolus AE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4714645 | biostudies-other | 2015 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMedian nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) is the primary sonographic parameter for assessing and diagnosing median nerve pathology, such as carpal tunnel syndrome. However, variability in the sensitivity of diagnostic thresholds exists, which may be due to a lack of standardized normative reference values. Current estimates of normal median nerve CSA stem largely from small studies using a local pool of healthy controls. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted to identify all available data for median nerve CSA in healthy, asymptomatic individuals to create a comprehensive set of normative reference values.MethodsArticles that include sonographic measures of median nerve CSA will be identified through a rigorous search of published evidence, a hand search through tables of contents of key journals, and the gray literature, including ClinicalTrials.gov and conference abstracts. Each abstract and full text will be reviewed by multiple raters to identify studies from 2000 to present that include original data. Any study that provides median nerve CSA values from healthy individuals will be included (e.g., reference value study, control participants in a diagnostic study). Studies will be assessed for quality using a modified version of the National Institute of Health Study Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, with primary focus on the use of a detailed and acceptable image acquisition and analysis protocol. Using data from included studies, reference values will be calculated for median nerve CSA by anatomical regions, including the distal forearm, wrist, and carpal tunnel at the level of the pisiform. Reference values will be stratified by gender, ethnicity, and age based upon the specificity of the data provided by the included articles.DiscussionA comprehensive set of normative reference values of median nerve CSA will reduce variability across studies, allowing future research to more accurately evaluate and establish diagnostic thresholds. Additionally, normative values can serve as a reference for evaluating treatment outcomes and provide a means to investigate and understand minor nuances in CSA changes that may be indicative of preclinical stages of median nerve pathology.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO 2016 CRD42016037286.

Project description:ImportanceDialysis facilities in the United States are required to educate patients with end-stage renal disease about all treatment options, including kidney transplantation. Patients receiving dialysis typically require a referral for kidney transplant evaluation at a transplant center from a dialysis facility to start the transplantation process, but the proportion of patients referred for transplantation is unknown.ObjectiveTo describe variation in dialysis facility-level referral for kidney transplant evaluation and factors associated with referral among patients initiating dialysis in Georgia, the US state with the lowest kidney transplantation rates.Design, setting, and participantsExamination of United States Renal Data System data from a cohort of 15,279 incident, adult (18-69 years) patients with end-stage renal disease from 308 Georgia dialysis facilities from January 2005 to September 2011, followed up through September 2012, linked to kidney transplant referral data collected from adult transplant centers in Georgia in the same period.Main outcomes and measuresReferral for kidney transplant evaluation within 1 year of starting dialysis at any of the 3 Georgia transplant centers was the primary outcome; placement on the deceased donor waiting list was also examined.ResultsThe median within-facility percentage of patients referred within 1 year of starting dialysis was 24.4% (interquartile range, 16.7%-33.3%) and varied from 0% to 75.0%. Facilities in the lowest tertile of referral (<19.2%) were more likely to treat patients living in high-poverty neighborhoods (absolute difference, 21.8% [95% CI, 14.1%-29.4%]), had a higher patient to social worker ratio (difference, 22.5 [95% CI, 9.7-35.2]), and were more likely nonprofit (difference, 17.6% [95% CI, 7.7%-27.4%]) compared with facilities in the highest tertile of referral (>31.3%). In multivariable, multilevel analyses, factors associated with lower referral for transplantation, such as older age, white race, and nonprofit facility status, were not always consistent with the factors associated with lower waitlisting.Conclusions and relevanceIn Georgia overall, a limited proportion of patients treated with dialysis were referred for kidney transplant evaluation between 2005 and 2011, but there was substantial variability in referral among facilities. Variables associated with referral were not always associated with waitlisting, suggesting that different factors may account for disparities in referral.

Dataset Information

Sonographic examination of the median nerve in dialysis patients and after renal transplantation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets