Estimating the minimum control count of random network models.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ruths D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4730149 | biostudies-other | 2016
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:Longitudinal zero-inflated count data arise frequently in substance use research when assessing the effects of behavioral and pharmacological interventions. Zero-inflated count models (e.g. zero-inflated Poisson or zero-inflated negative binomial) with random effects have been developed to analyze this type of data. In random effects zero-inflated count models, the random effects covariance matrix is typically assumed to be homogeneous (constant across subjects). However, in many situations this matrix may be heterogeneous (differ by measured covariates). In this paper, we extend zero-inflated count models to account for random effects heterogeneity by modeling their variance as a function of covariates. We show via simulation that ignoring intervention and covariate-specific heterogeneity can produce biased estimates of covariate and random effect estimates. Moreover, those biased estimates can be rectified by correctly modeling the random effects covariance structure. The methodological development is motivated by and applied to the Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence (COMBINE) study, the largest clinical trial of alcohol dependence performed in United States with 1383 individuals.
| S-EPMC5045322 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The recently measured yeast transcriptional network is analyzed in terms of simplified Boolean network models, with the aim of determining feasible rule structures, given the requirement of stable solutions of the generated Boolean networks. We find that, for ensembles of generated models, those with canalyzing Boolean rules are remarkably stable, whereas those with random Boolean rules are only marginally stable. Furthermore, substantial parts of the generated networks are frozen, in the sense that they reach the same state, regardless of initial state. Thus, our ensemble approach suggests that the yeast network shows highly ordered dynamics.
| S-EPMC299805 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Biological networks are becoming a fundamental tool for the investigation of high-throughput data in several fields of biology and biotechnology. With the increasing amount of information, network-based models are gaining more and more interest and new techniques are required in order to mine the information and to validate the results. To fill the validation gap we present an app, for the Cytoscape platform, which aims at creating randomised networks and randomising existing, real networks. Since there is a lack of tools that allow performing such operations, our app aims at enabling researchers to exploit different, well known random network models that could be used as a benchmark for validating real, biological datasets. We also propose a novel methodology for creating random weighted networks, i.e. the multiplication algorithm, starting from real, quantitative data. Finally, the app provides a statistical tool that compares real versus randomly computed attributes, in order to validate the numerical findings. In summary, our app aims at creating a standardised methodology for the validation of the results in the context of the Cytoscape platform.
| S-EPMC5686481 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A standard approach to distinguishing people's risk preferences is to estimate a random utility model using a power utility function to characterize the preferences and a logit function to capture choice consistency. We demonstrate that with often-used choice situations, this model suffers from empirical underidentification, meaning that parameters cannot be estimated precisely. With simulations of estimation accuracy and Kullback-Leibler divergence measures we examined factors that potentially mitigate this problem. First, using a choice set that guarantees a switch in the utility order between two risky gambles in the range of plausible values leads to higher estimation accuracy than randomly created choice sets or the purpose-built choice sets common in the literature. Second, parameter estimates are regularly correlated, which contributes to empirical underidentification. Examining standardizations of the utility scale, we show that they mitigate this correlation and additionally improve the estimation accuracy for choice consistency. Yet, they can have detrimental effects on the estimation accuracy of risk preference. Finally, we also show how repeated versus distinct choice sets and an increase in observations affect estimation accuracy. Together, these results should help researchers make informed design choices to estimate parameters in the random utility model more precisely.
| S-EPMC9298769 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Analysis of the structure of biological networks often uses statistical tests to establish the over-representation of motifs, which are thought to be important building blocks of such networks, related to their biological functions. However, there is disagreement as to the statistical significance of these motifs, and there are potential problems with standard methods for estimating this significance. Exponential random graph models (ERGMs) are a class of statistical model that can overcome some of the shortcomings of commonly used methods for testing the statistical significance of motifs. ERGMs were first introduced into the bioinformatics literature over 10 years ago but have had limited application to biological networks, possibly due to the practical difficulty of estimating model parameters. Advances in estimation algorithms now afford analysis of much larger networks in practical time. We illustrate the application of ERGM to both an undirected protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and directed gene regulatory networks. ERGM models indicate over-representation of triangles in the PPI network, and confirm results from previous research as to over-representation of transitive triangles (feed-forward loop) in an E. coli and a yeast regulatory network. We also confirm, using ERGMs, previous research showing that under-representation of the cyclic triangle (feedback loop) can be explained as a consequence of other topological features.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41109-021-00434-y.
| S-EPMC8608783 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Exponential-family Random Graph Models (ERGMs) have long been at the forefront of the analysis of relational data. The exponential-family form allows complex network dependencies to be represented. Models in this class are interpretable, flexible and have a strong theoretical foundation. The availability of powerful user-friendly open-source software allows broad accessibility and use. However, ERGMs sometimes suffer from a serious condition known as near-degeneracy, in which the model exhibits unrealistic probabilistic behavior or a severe lack-of-fit to real network data. Recently, Fellows and Handcock (2017) proposed a new model class, the Tapered ERGM, which circumvents the issue of near-degeneracy while maintaining the desirable features of ERGMs. However, the question of how to determine the proper amount of tapering needed for any model was heretofore left unanswered. This paper develops a new methodology for how to determine the necessary level of tapering and as such provides a new approach to inference for the Tapered ERGM class. Noting that a Tapered ERGM can always be made non-degenerate, we offer data-driven approaches for determining the amount of tapering necessary. The mean-value parameter estimates are unaffected by tapering, and we show that the natural parameter estimates are numerically weakly varying by the level of tapering. We then apply the Tapered ERGM to two published networks to demonstrate its effectiveness in cases where typical ERGMs fail and present the case for Tapered ERGMs replacing ERGMs entirely.
| S-EPMC10441622 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In general, different countries and communities respond to epidemics in accordance with their own control plans and protocols. However, owing to global human migration and mobility, strategic planning for epidemic control measures through the collaboration of relevant public health administrations is gaining importance for mitigating and containing large-scale epidemics. Here, we present a framework to evaluate the effectiveness of random (non-strategic) and targeted (strategic) epidemic interventions for spatially separated patches in metapopulation models. For a random intervention, we analytically derive the critical fraction of patches that receive epidemic interventions, above which epidemics are successfully contained. The analysis shows that the heterogeneity of patch connectivity makes it difficult to contain epidemics under the random intervention. We demonstrate that, particularly in such heterogeneously connected networks, targeted interventions are considerably effective compared to the random intervention. Our framework is useful for identifying the target areas where epidemic control measures should be focused.
| S-EPMC4099978 | biostudies-literature
Project description:As a key variance partitioning tool, linear mixed models (LMMs) using genome-based restricted maximum likelihood (GREML) allow both fixed and random effects. Classic LMMs assume independence between random effects, which can be violated, causing bias. Here we introduce a generalized GREML, named CORE GREML, that explicitly estimates the covariance between random effects. Using extensive simulations, we show that CORE GREML outperforms the conventional GREML, providing variance and covariance estimates free from bias due to correlated random effects. Applying CORE GREML to UK Biobank data, we find, for example, that the transcriptome, imputed using genotype data, explains a significant proportion of phenotypic variance for height (0.15, p-value = 1.5e-283), and that these transcriptomic effects correlate with the genomic effects (genome-transcriptome correlation = 0.35, p-value = 1.2e-14). We conclude that the covariance between random effects is a key parameter for estimation, especially when partitioning phenotypic variance by multi-omics layers.
| S-EPMC7442840 | biostudies-literature
Project description:As biological knowledge accumulates rapidly, gene networks encoding genome-wide gene-gene interactions have been constructed. As an improvement over the standard mixture model that tests all the genes iid a priori, Wei and Li (2007) and Wei and Pan (2008) proposed modeling a gene network as a Discrete- or Gaussian-Markov random field (DMRF or GMRF) respectively in a mixture model to analyze genomic data. However, how these methods compare in practical applications in not well understood and this is the aim here. We also propose two novel constraints in prior specifications for the GMRF model and a fully Bayesian approach to the DMRF model. We assess the accuracy of estimating the False Discovery Rate (FDR) by posterior probabilities in the context of MRF models. Applications to a ChIP-chip data set and simulated data show that the modified GMRF models has superior performance as compared with other models, while both MRF-based mixture models, with reasonable robustness to misspecified gene networks, outperform the standard mixture model.
| S-EPMC3046412 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It is common practice for assessment programs to organize qualifying sessions during which the raters (often known as "markers" or "judges") demonstrate their consistency before operational rating commences. Because of the high-stakes nature of many rating activities, the research community tends to continuously explore new methods to analyze rating data. We used simulated and empirical data from two high-stakes language assessments, to propose a new approach, based on social network analysis and exponential graph models, to evaluate the readiness of a group of raters for operational rating. The results of this innovative approach are compared with the results of a Rasch analysis, which is a well-established approach for the analysis of such data. We also demonstrate how the new approach can be practically used to investigate important research questions such as whether rater severity is stable across rating tasks. The merits of the new approach, and the consequences for practice are discussed.
| S-EPMC6096459 | biostudies-literature