Use of opioids and other analgesics by older adults in the United States, 1999-2010.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Steinman MA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4733650 | biostudies-other | 2015 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Publications
Use of opioids and other analgesics by older adults in the United States, 1999-2010.
Steinman Michael A MA Komaiko Kiya D R KD Fung Kathy Z KZ Ritchie Christine S CS
Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) 20141028 2
<h4>Background and objective</h4>There has been concern over rising use of prescription opioids in young and middle-aged adults. Much less is known about opioid prescribing in older adults, for whom clinical recommendations and the balance of risks and benefits differ from younger adults. We evaluated changes in use of opioids and other analgesics in a national sample of clinic visits made by older adults between 1999 and 2010.<h4>Design, setting, and subjects</h4>Observational study of adults a ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Many changes in the economy, policies related to nutrition, and food processing have occurred within the United States since 2000, and the net effect on dietary quality is not clear. These changes may have affected various socioeconomic groups differentially.To investigate trends in dietary quality from 1999 to 2010 in the US adult population and within socioeconomic subgroups.Nationally representative sample of 29?124 adults aged 20 to 85 years from the US 1999 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.The Alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010 (AHEI-2010), an 11-dimension score (range, 0-10 for each component score and 0-110 for the total score), was used to measure dietary quality. A higher AHEI-2010 score indicated a more healthful diet.The energy-adjusted mean of the AHEI-2010 increased from 39.9 in 1999 to 2000 to 46.8 in 2009 to 2010 (linear trend P?<?.001). Reduction in trans fat intake accounted for more than half of this improvement. The AHEI-2010 component score increased by 0.9 points for sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice (reflecting decreased consumption), 0.7 points for whole fruit, 0.5 points for whole grains, 0.5 points for polyunsaturated fatty acids, and 0.4 points for nuts and legumes over the 12-year period (all linear trend P?<?.001). Family income and education level were positively associated with total AHEI-2010, and the gap between low and high socioeconomic status widened over time, from 3.9 points in 1999 to 2000 to 7.8 points in 2009 to 2010 (interaction P?=?.01).Although a steady improvement in AHEI-2010 was observed across the 12-year period, the overall dietary quality remains poor. Better dietary quality was associated with higher socioeconomic status, and the gap widened with time. Future efforts to improve nutrition should address these disparities.
| S-EPMC5924699 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVES:To detail annual trends in benzodiazepine incidence and prevalence in older adults between 2010 and 2016 in three countries. DESIGN:Observational multicountry cohort study with harmonized study protocol. SETTING:The United States (veteran population); Ontario, Canada; and Australia. PARTICIPANTS:All people aged 65 and older (8,270,000 people). MEASUREMENTS:Annual incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine use stratified according to age group (65-74, 75-84, ≥85) and sex. We performed multiple regression analyses to assess whether rates of incident and prevalent use changed significantly over time. RESULTS:Over the study period, we observed a significant decrease in incident benzodiazepine use in the United States (2.6% to 1.7%) and Ontario (6.0% to 4.4%) but not Australia (7.0% to 6.7%). We found significant declines in prevalent use in all countries (United States: 9.2% to 7.3%; Ontario: 18.2% to 13.4%; Australia: 20.2% to 16.8%). Although incidence and prevalence increased with age in Ontario and Australia, they decreased with age in the United States. Incidence and prevalence were higher in women in all countries. CONCLUSION:Consistent with other international studies, there have been small but significant reductions in the incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine use in older adults in all three countries, with the exception of incidence in Australia, although use remains inappropriately high-particularly in those aged 85 and older-which warrants further attention from clinicians and policy-makers.
| S-EPMC6087688 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe majority of Americans consume alcoholic beverages. Alcohol interacts negatively with numerous commonly prescribed medications. Yet, on a population level, little is known about use of alcohol-interactive (AI) prescription medications among drinkers. The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of AI prescription medication use among current drinkers in the U.S. population.MethodsData were from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 1999 to 2010); 26,657 adults aged ≥20 years had data on past year alcohol consumption and past month prescription medication use. Analyses were adjusted for covariates: age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, and smoking. Statistical procedures accounted for survey stratification, clustering, and nonresponse. Analyses were weighted to be nationally representative.ResultsThe unadjusted total prevalence of AI medication use was 42.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.5 to 44.0). Among current drinkers, adjusted prevalence was 41.5% (CI 40.3 to 42.7). Among participants aged ≥65 total prevalence of AI medication use was 78.6% (CI 77.3 to 79.9) and adjusted prevalence among current drinkers was 77.8% (CI 75.7 to 79.7). The AI medications most commonly used by current drinkers were cardiovascular agents, central nervous system agents, and metabolic agents.ConclusionsOur results suggest that there could be substantial simultaneous exposure to alcohol and AI prescription medications in the U.S. population. Given the adverse health risks of combining alcohol with AI prescription medications, future efforts are needed to collect data to determine actual simultaneous prevalence.
| S-EPMC4331237 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It is important to document patterns of prescription drug use to inform both clinical practice and research.To evaluate trends in prescription drug use among adults living in the United States.Temporal trends in prescription drug use were evaluated using nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants included 37,959 noninstitutionalized US adults, aged 20 years and older. Seven NHANES cycles were included (1999-2000 to 2011-2012), and the sample size per cycle ranged from 4861 to 6212.Calendar year, as represented by continuous NHANES cycle.Within each NHANES cycle, use of prescription drugs in the prior 30 days was assessed overall and by drug class. Temporal trends across cycles were evaluated. Analyses were weighted to represent the US adult population.Results indicate an increase in overall use of prescription drugs among US adults between 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 with an estimated 51% of US adults reporting use of any prescription drugs in 1999-2000 and an estimated 59% reporting use of any prescription drugs in 2011-2012 (difference, 8% [95% CI, 3.8%-12%]; P for trend <.001). The prevalence of polypharmacy (use of ?5 prescription drugs) increased from an estimated 8.2% in 1999-2000 to 15% in 2011-2012 (difference, 6.6% [95% CI, 4.4%-8.2%]; P for trend <.001). These trends remained statistically significant with age adjustment. Among the 18 drug classes used by more than 2.5% of the population at any point over the study period, the prevalence of use increased in 11 drug classes including antihyperlipidemic agents, antidepressants, prescription proton-pump inhibitors, and muscle relaxants.In this nationally representative survey, significant increases in overall prescription drug use and polypharmacy were observed. These increases persisted after accounting for changes in the age distribution of the population. The prevalence of prescription drug use increased in the majority of, but not all, drug classes.
| S-EPMC4752169 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundOlder adults frequently have several chronic health conditions which require multiple medications. We illustrated trends in prescription medication use over 20 years in the United States, and described characteristics of older adults using multiple medications in 2009-2010.MethodsParticipants included 13,869 adults aged 65 years and older in the National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-2010). Prescription medication use was verified by medication containers. Potentially inappropriate medications were defined by the 2003 Beers Criteria.ResultsBetween 1988 and 2010 the median number of prescription medications used among adults aged 65 and older doubled from 2 to 4, and the proportion taking ≥5 medications tripled from 12.8% (95% confidence interval: 11.1, 14.8) to 39.0% (35.8, 42.3).These increases were driven, in part, by rising use of cardioprotective and antidepressant medications. Use of potentially inappropriate medications decreased from 28.2% (25.5, 31.0) to 15.1% (13.2, 17.3) between 1988 and 2010. Higher medication use was associated with higher prevalence of functional limitation, activities of daily living limitation, and confusion/memory problems in 2009-2010, although these associations did not remain after adjustment for covariates. In multivariable models, older age, number of chronic conditions, and annual health care visits were associated with increased odds of using both 1-4 and ≥5 medications. Additionally, body mass index, higher income-poverty ratio, former smoking, and non-black non-white race were associated with use of ≥5 medications.ConclusionsPrescription medication use increased dramatically among older adults between 1988 and 2010. Contemporary older adults on multiple medications have worse health status compared with those on less medications, and appear to be a vulnerable population.
| S-EPMC4573668 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAnaphylaxis-related deaths in the United States have not been well characterized in recent years.ObjectivesWe sought to define epidemiologic features and time trends of fatal anaphylaxis in the United States from 1999 to 2010.MethodsAnaphylaxis-related deaths were identified by using the 10th clinical modification of the International Classification of Diseases system diagnostic codes on death certificates from the US National Mortality Database. Rates were calculated by using census population estimates.ResultsThere were a total of 2458 anaphylaxis-related deaths in the United States from 1999 to 2010. Medications were the most common cause (58.8%), followed by "unspecified" (19.3%), venom (15.2%), and food (6.7%). There was a significant increase in fatal drug-induced anaphylaxis over 12 years: from 0.27 (95% CI, 0.23-0.30) per million in 1999 to 2001 to 0.51 (95% CI, 0.47-0.56) per million in 2008 to 2010 (P < .001). Fatal anaphylaxis caused by medications, food, and unspecified allergens was significantly associated with African American race and older age (P < .001). Fatal anaphylaxis to venom was significantly associated with white race, older age, and male sex (P < .001). The rates of fatal anaphylaxis to foods in male African American subjects increased from 0.06 (95% CI, 0.01-0.17) per million in 1999 to 2001 to 0.21 (95% CI, 0.11-0.37) per million in 2008 to 2010 (P < .001). The rates of unspecified fatal anaphylaxis decreased over time from 0.30 (95% CI, 0.26-0.34) per million in 1999 to 2001 to 0.09 (95% CI, 0.07-0.11) per million in 2008 to 2010 (P < .001).ConclusionThere are strong and disparate associations between race and specific classes of anaphylaxis-related mortality in the United States. The increase in medication-related deaths caused by anaphylaxis likely relates to increased medication and radiocontrast use, enhanced diagnosis, and coding changes.
| S-EPMC4260987 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesWe examined the proportion of patients initiating extended-release (ER) opioids who become long-term users and describe how pain-related diagnoses before initiation of opioid therapy vary between drugs and over time.MethodsUsing MarketScan (2006-2015), a US national commercial insurance database, we examined pain-related diagnoses in the 182-day baseline period before initiation of ER opioid therapy to characterize indications for opioid initiation. We report the proportion who became long-term users, the median length of opioid therapy, and the proportion with cancer and other noncancer chronic pain, by active ingredient.ResultsAmong 1,077,566 adults initiating ER opioids, 31% became long-term users, with a median length of use of 209 days. The most common ER opioids prescribed were oxycodone (26%) and fentanyl (23%), and the most common noncancer pain diagnoses were back pain (65%) and arthritis (48%). Among all long-term users, 16% had a diagnosis of cancer. We found notable variation by drug. Eighteen percent of patients initiating drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration >10 years ago had evidence of cancer during baseline compared with only 8% of patients who received newer drugs.ConclusionsIn a national sample of adults with private insurance, back pain was the most common diagnosis preceding initiation of opioid therapy. Opioids that have been approved within the last 10 years were more frequently associated with musculoskeletal pains and less frequently associated with cancer. Amid increasing concerns regarding long-term opioid therapy, our findings provide context regarding the conditions for which long-term opioid therapy is prescribed.
| S-EPMC7534397 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn a nationally representative sample of United States Medicare beneficiaries, we examined the extent of chiropractic use, factors associated with seeing a chiropractor, and predictors of the volume of chiropractic use among those having seen one.MethodsWe performed secondary analyses of baseline interview data on 4,310 self-respondents who were 70 years old or older when they first participated in the Survey on Assets and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD). The interview data were then linked to their Medicare claims. Multiple logistic and negative binomial regressions were used.ResultsThe average annual rate of chiropractic use was 4.6%. During the four-year period (two years before and two years after each respondent's baseline interview), 10.3% had one or more visits to a chiropractor. African Americans and Hispanics, as well as those with multiple depressive symptoms and those who lived in counties with lower than average supplies of chiropractors were much less likely to use them. The use of chiropractors was much more likely among those who drank alcohol, had arthritis, reported pain, and were able to drive. Chiropractic services did not substitute for physician visits. Among those who had seen a chiropractor, the volume of chiropractic visits was lower for those who lived alone, had lower incomes, and poorer cognitive abilities, while it was greater for the overweight and those with lower body limitations.ConclusionChiropractic use among older adults is less prevalent than has been consistently reported for the United States as a whole, and is most common among Whites, those reporting pain, and those with geographic, financial, and transportation access.
| S-EPMC2034378 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceMonitoring trends in prescription analgesic use among adults with musculoskeletal conditions provides insight into how changing prescribing practices, guidelines, and policy measures may affect those who need pain management.ObjectiveTo evaluate trends in prescription opioid use and nonopioid analgesic use among adults with functional limitations attributable to musculoskeletal conditions.Design, setting, and participantsThis repeated cross-sectional study uses data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study from 1999 to 2016. Data were analyzed from January to July 2019. The participants were adults aged 30 to 79 years who reported functional limitations due to back or neck problems and/or arthritis or rheumatism.Main outcomes and measuresAny use of a prescription opioid or exclusive use of a prescription nonopioid analgesic.ResultsIn this population of 7256 adults with 1 or more functional limitations attributable to a musculoskeletal condition (4226 women [59.9%]; 3508 [74.4%] non-Hispanic white individuals; median [interquartile range] age, 63 [53-70] years), opioid use and exclusive nonopioid analgesic use exhibited approximately reciprocal patterns of change from 1999 to 2016. Opioid use increased significantly (difference in prevalence for 2015-2016 vs 1999-2000, 7.2%; 95% CI, 1.3% to 13%; P for trend = .002), and exclusive use of nonopioid analgesics decreased significantly (difference in prevalence for 2015-2016 vs 1999-2000, -13%; 95% CI, -19% to -7.5%; P for trend < .001) during this period. The increase in any opioid use was driven by long-term rather than short-term use. A crossover in the prevalence of opioid use and exclusive use of nonopioid analgesics occurred between 2003 and 2006, after which opioid use was more prevalent. Between 2013 and 2016, decreases in opioid use were observed among men (difference in prevalence for 2015-2016 vs 2013-2014, -11%; 95% CI, -21% to 1.8%) and participants with less than a high school education (difference, -15%; 95% CI, -24% to -6.1%). During this same period, exclusive nonopioid analgesic use also decreased markedly across the population (difference, -5.3%; 95% CI, -9.1% to -1.5%).Conclusions and relevanceThe substitution of opioids for nonopioid analgesics between 2003 and 2006 may have occurred as evidence emerged on the cardiovascular risks associated with nonopioid analgesics. Reductions in opioid use between 2013 and 2016 were most substantial among those with low socioeconomic status, who may encounter barriers in accessing alternatives. Despite those decreases, opioid use remained more prevalent in 2015 to 2016 than in 1999 to 2000, suggesting a potentially long tail for the opioid epidemic.
| S-EPMC6991204 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11349650 | biostudies-literature