Dataset Information

Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis.

ABSTRACT: As a non-invasive, side effect-free and cost-effective method, ultrasonography represents the method of choice for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Four different criteria in total, including two direct criteria in peak systolic velocity (PSV) and renal aortic ratio (RAR) and two indirect criteria in resistance index (RI) and acceleration time (AT) for the measurement of relevant renal artery stenosis are described, each demonstrating highly variable accuracy in studies. Furthermore, there is controversy over the degree beyond which stenosis becomes therapeutically relevant and which ultrasound PSV is diagnostically relevant in terms of stenosis grading.This article gives a critical review based on a selective literature search on measurement methodology and the validity of ultrasound in renal artery stenosis. A critical evaluation of methods and a presentation of measurement principles to establish the most precise measurement method possible compared with the gold standard angiography, as well as an evaluation of the importance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).The PSV provides high sensitivity and specificity as a direct measurement method in stenosis detection and grading. Most studies found sensitivities and specificities of 85-90?% for >?50?% stenosis at a PSV >?180-200 cm/s in ROC curve analysis. Other methods, such as the ratio of the PSV in the aorta to the PSV in the renal artery (RAR) or indirect criteria, such as side to side differences in RI (dRI) or AT can be additionally used to improve accuracy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves accuracy by means of echo contrast enhancement. Although in the past only high-grade stenosis was considered relevant for treatment, a drop in pressure of >?20 mmHg in >?50?% stenosis (PSV 180 cm/s) is classified as relevant for increased renin secretion. Stenosis in fibromuscular dysplasia can be reliably graded according to the continuity equation. Although the available studies on the grading of in-stent restenosis are the subject of controversy, there is a tendency to assume higher cut-off values for PSV and RAR. Whilst MRA and CTA demonstrate an accuracy of >?90?%, this is at the cost of possible side effects for patients, particularly in the case of pre-existing renal parenchymal damage.This article includes two additional video sequences on visualizing renal artery stenosis. This supplemental material can be found under: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00772-015-0060-3.

SUBMITTER: Schaberle W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4767855 | biostudies-other | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis.

Schäberle W W Leyerer L L Schierling W W Pfister K K

Gefasschirurgie : Zeitschrift fur vaskulare und endovaskulare Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschen und der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie unter Mitarbeit der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie 20150828

<h4>Background and purpose</h4>As a non-invasive, side effect-free and cost-effective method, ultrasonography represents the method of choice for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Four different criteria in total, including two direct criteria in peak systolic velocity (PSV) and renal aortic ratio (RAR) and two indirect criteria in resistance index (RI) and acceleration time (AT) for the measurement of relevant renal artery stenosis are described, each demonstrating highly variable accurac ...[more]

PMID: 27034579

Similar Datasets

Project description:Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis reduces renal blood flow (RBF) and amplifies stenotic kidney hypoxia. Revascularization with percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) and stenting often fails to recover renal function, possibly because of ischemia/reperfusion injury developing after PTRA. Elamipretide is a mitochondrial-targeted peptide that binds to cardiolipin and stabilizes mitochondrial function. We tested the hypothesis that elamipretide plus PTRA would improve renal function, oxygenation, and RBF in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis undergoing PTRA. Inpatient studies were performed in patients with severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis scheduled for PTRA. Patients were treated before and during PTRA with elamipretide (0.05 mg/kg per hour intravenous infusion, n=6) or placebo (n=8). Stenotic kidney cortical/medullary perfusion and RBF were measured using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT, and renal oxygenation by 3-T blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging before and 3 months after PTRA. Age and basal glomerular filtration rate did not differ between groups. Blood oxygen level-dependent imaging demonstrated increased fractional hypoxia 24 hours after angiography and stenting in placebo (+47%) versus elamipretide (-6%). These were reverted to baseline 3 months later. Stenotic kidney RBF rose (202±29-262±115 mL/min; P=0.04) 3 months after PTRA in the elamipretide-treated group only. Over 3 months, systolic blood pressure decreased, and estimated glomerular filtration rate increased (P=0.003) more in the elamipretide group than in the placebo group (P=0.11). Adjunctive elamipretide during PTRA was associated with attenuated postprocedural hypoxia, increased RBF, and improved kidney function in this pilot trial. These data support a role for targeted mitochondrial protection to minimize procedure-associated ischemic injury and to improve outcomes of revascularization for human atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01755858.

Project description:BackgroundDoppler ultrasound (DUS) is recommended in first-line imaging for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis (RAS). However, the correct selection of Doppler direct or indirect parameters and their optimal thresholds remain controversial. This study explored simple ultrasound Doppler parameters to diagnose severe RAS (RAS ≥70%) in routine clinical practice.MethodsIn this retrospective study, patients with clinically suspected renovascular hypertension who first underwent renal artery DUS and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and subsequent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) were consecutively included. Clinical characteristics and ultrasound Doppler hemodynamic parameters were collected, including peak systolic velocity (PSV), the ratio of the peak velocities in the renal artery and the aorta (RAR), the ratio of the peak velocities in the renal artery and the segmental artery (RSR), and the ratio of the peak velocities in the renal artery and the interlobar artery (RIR). All enrolled patients were divided into two groups based on the degree of diameter reduction: a severe stenosis group (diameter reduction ≥70%) and a non-severe stenosis group (diameter reduction <70%). Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors for severe stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the ultrasound Doppler parameters.ResultsA total of 85 patients (106 renal arteries) with RAS were included in this study. The optimal thresholds of PSV in the main renal artery and the PSV ratios for diagnosing severe RAS obtained via receiver operating characteristic curves were 249.5 cm/s for PSV, 2.94 for RAR, 5.1 for RSR, and 7.5 for RIR. The areas under the curve of PSV and the ratios all exhibited good diagnostic efficiency (all >0.8). The combination of these four Doppler variables demonstrated a significant benefit to the overall diagnostic value compared with any factor alone [area under the curve (AUC) =0.962; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.906-0.989; P<0.05]. The combination of PSV and RSR (AUC =0.925; 95% CI: 0.858-0.967) exhibited comparable diagnostic efficiency to the combination of four ultrasonographic variables (z statistic =1.882; P=0.06).ConclusionsThis simple and accurate method to evaluate severe RAS based on the velocity obtained via basic DUS may facilitate the detection of severe RAS in the majority of medical institutions and provide a reliable basis for the selection of proper candidates for further angiography or revascularization.

Dataset Information

Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis.

Publications

Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets