Dataset Information

Afatinib in first-line setting for NSCLC harbouring common EGFR mutations: new light after the preliminary results of LUX-Lung 7?

ABSTRACT: The development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) changed dramatically the history of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR sensitive mutations. Several randomized prospective trials confirmed the superiority of these target agents about survival and response rate when comparing with platinum-based chemotherapy. Knowledge about EGFR mutations increased gradually during the development of target agents and different clinical trials. EGFR mutations cannot be considered all equal, but different entities should be considered in our clinical practice: exon 19 deletions, exon 21 mutation (L858R) and uncommon mutation (exon 20, exon 18 and double mutation). Nowadays, we dispose of three different EGFR TKIs (afatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib) approved for the treatment for first-line treatment of patients di NSCLC carrying EGFR, that was compared only by indirect analysis, producing data not always clear and convincing. This research highlight is an overview of data about EGFR TKIs in first-line setting, focusing on differences about exon 19 deletions and L585R mutation in patients treated with different TKIs. In addition, we report the preliminary results of the first head-to-head randomized clinical trial between two different EGFR TKIs, the LUX-Lung 7 (LL7) that compared afatinib and gefitinib showing interesting results.

SUBMITTER: Passaro A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4805786 | biostudies-other | 2016 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Afatinib in first-line setting for NSCLC harbouring common EGFR mutations: new light after the preliminary results of LUX-Lung 7?

Passaro Antonio A Pochesci Alessia A Spitaleri Gianluca G Catania Chiara C Noberasco Cristina C Del Signore Ester E de Marinis Filippo F

Journal of thoracic disease 20160301 3

The development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) changed dramatically the history of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR sensitive mutations. Several randomized prospective trials confirmed the superiority of these target agents about survival and response rate when comparing with platinum-based chemotherapy. Knowledge about EGFR mutations increased gradually during the development of target agents and different clinical trials. EGFR muta ...[more]

PMID: 27076973

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction:Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China. Four epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors - afatinib, erlotinib, icotinib, and gefitinib - are available for first-line treatment of NSCLC in China; however, there are few data to guide treatment choice. The Phase III LUX-Lung 6 trial compared afatinib with platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of patients from Southeast Asia with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. This post hoc analysis assessed the findings from LUX-Lung 6 in Chinese patients. Clinical trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01121393. Materials and methods:Previously untreated patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma were randomized 2:1 to receive afatinib or ?6 cycles of gemcitabine/ cisplatin. The key outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS; primary), objective response rate, disease control rate, overall survival (OS), duration of response and disease control, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Three hundred and twenty-seven patients from mainland China were treated (89.8% of overall LUX-Lung 6 population; afatinib 217, gemcitabine/cisplatin 110). Results:PFS was significantly longer with afatinib than gemcitabine/cisplatin (median 11.0 versus 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.30 [95% CI, 0.21, 0.43]; P,0.0001). Overall, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment arms; however, in a subgroup analysis, afatinib significantly improved OS versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with an EGFR Del19 mutation (median 31.6 versus 16.3 months; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.41, 0.91]; P=0.0146). Afatinib was well tolerated, with most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) being of grade 1 or 2 severity. The most common grade 3/4 TRAEs with afatinib were rash/acne (15.9%/0.5%), stomatitis (6.1%/0%), and diarrhea (5.6%/0%). TRAEs leading to permanent discontinuation were reported in 12 patients (5.6%) receiving afatinib and 43 (41.7%) receiving gemcitabine/cisplatin. Afatinib significantly improved PFS compared with standard first-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and demonstrated a manageable safety profile. Conclusion:The findings support the rationale for using afatinib as a first-line treatment option for this patient population.

Project description:The impact of combining epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Therefore, randomized trials that compared this combined regimen with chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs monotherapy were included for this meta-analysis. We used published hazard ratios (HRs), if available, or derived treatment estimates from other survival data. Pooled estimates of treatment efficacy of the combined regimen in the entire unselected population and selected patients by EGFR-mutation status and smoking history were calculated. Eight trials eventually entered into this meta-analysis, including 4585 patients. Overall, the combined regimen significantly delayed disease progression (HR?=?0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95, P?=?0.01); subgroup analysis showed significantly higher progression free survival advantages in Asian patients (P<0.001), with sequential combination of TKIs and chemotherapy (P?=?0.02). In selected patients by EGFR-mutation, both mutation positive (HR?=?0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.83, P?=?0.009) and negative (HR?=?0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.98, P?=?0.02) patients gained progression free survival benefit from the combined regimen, albeit the magnitude of benefit was marginally larger in mutation positive patients (P?=?0.05). In selected patients by smoking history, never/light smokers achieved a great progression free survival benefit from the combined regimen (HR?=?0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.74, P?=?0.0004). Unfortunately, the combined regimen had no significant impact on overall survival, irrespective of ethnicity, dose schedules or EGFR-mutation status. Severe anorexia (RR?=?2.01, 95% CI 1.11-3.63; P?=?0.02) and diarrhea (RR?=?2.70, 95% CI 1.94-3.76; P<0.001) were more frequent in the combined regimen arm. This strategy of combining EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy deserved to be considered in the future, although it is not approved for advanced NSCLC at the moment.

Project description:IntroductionEGFR G724S has been described to mediate resistance to first- and third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In vitro experiments have provided compelling evidence that G724S retains sensitivity for afatinib. Nevertheless, limited data have reported the clinical efficacy of afatinib in patients with NSCLC harboring G724S mutation.MethodsWe identified 52 patients with NSCLC with EGFR G724S from an inhouse database and comprehensively profiled their concurrent mutation statuses. Treatments and clinical outcomes were also collected.ResultsOf 52 G724S-positive patients, 39 harbored concomitant EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del), and all 37 of the 39 patients who had available clinical data were detected with a G724S mutation after receiving EGFR TKIs. A rare variant of 19del E746_S752delinsV co-occurred with G724S the most frequently (n = 29), whereas 7 of 10 patients with concomitant EGFR exon 20 mutation were TKI treatment naive. S768I was the most common mutation in exon 20 (n = 7). One patient harbored a concomitant EGFR exon 21 mutation, and two lacked co-occurring EGFR mutations. A total of 23 patients provided valid clinical outcome data, of whom eight were treated with afatinib after the emergence of G724S, whereas 15 received non-afatinib treatment (alternative EGFR TKI, chemotherapy, or best supportive care). The disease control rate in afatinib-treated patients (n = 8) reached 100% with a median progression-free survival of 4.5 months, significantly longer than that of non-afatinib-treated (n = 15, 1.7 mo, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.32, p = 0.037) and alternative EGFR TKI-treated (n = 11, 1.8 mo, HR = 0.28, p = 0.042) patients. In the subset who had progressed on osimertinib, afatinib also yielded a superior progression-free survival (6.2 mo) than non-afatinib therapies (1.0 mo, HR = 0.04, p = 0.005) and alternative EGFR TKIs (1.8 mo, HR = 0.06, p = 0.033). Analysis of acquired mutations at afatinib progression revealed re-emergence of EGFR T790M or MET amplification as the potential mechanism of afatinib resistance.ConclusionsEGFR G724S emerges as a resistant mutation against EGFR TKI preferentially in the context of a rare variant of 19del, whereas it might mediate differential mechanisms in the context of exon 20 mutation. We also found that afatinib could be a potential therapeutic option for patients with NSCLC with G724S.

Dataset Information

Afatinib in first-line setting for NSCLC harbouring common EGFR mutations: new light after the preliminary results of LUX-Lung 7?

Publications

Afatinib in first-line setting for NSCLC harbouring common EGFR mutations: new light after the preliminary results of LUX-Lung 7?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets