Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Central Pressure Appraisal: Clinical Validation of a Subject-Specific Mathematical Model.


ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:Current evidence suggests that aortic blood pressure has a superior prognostic value with respect to brachial pressure for cardiovascular events, but direct measurement is not feasible in daily clinical practice. AIM:The aim of the present study is the clinical validation of a multiscale mathematical model for non-invasive appraisal of central blood pressure from subject-specific characteristics. METHODS:A total of 51 young male were selected for the present study. Aortic systolic and diastolic pressure were estimated with a mathematical model and were compared to the most-used non-invasive validated technique (SphygmoCor device, AtCor Medical, Australia). SphygmoCor was calibrated through diastolic and systolic brachial pressure obtained with a sphygmomanometer, while model inputs consist of brachial pressure, height, weight, age, left-ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, and data from a pulse wave velocity study. RESULTS:Model-estimated systolic and diastolic central blood pressures resulted to be significantly related to SphygmoCor-assessed central systolic (r = 0.65 p <0.0001) and diastolic (r = 0.84 p<0.0001) blood pressures. The model showed a significant overestimation of systolic pressure (+7.8 (-2.2;14) mmHg, p = 0.0003) and a significant underestimation of diastolic values (-3.2 (-7.5;1.6), p = 0.004), which imply a significant overestimation of central pulse pressure. Interestingly, model prediction errors mirror the mean errors reported in large meta-analysis characterizing the use of the SphygmoCor when non-invasive calibration is performed. CONCLUSION:In conclusion, multi-scale mathematical model predictions result to be significantly related to SphygmoCor ones. Model-predicted systolic and diastolic aortic pressure resulted in difference of less than 10 mmHg in the 51% and 84% of the subjects, respectively, when compared with SphygmoCor-obtained pressures.

SUBMITTER: Tosello F 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4806836 | biostudies-other | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

altmetric image

Publications

Central Pressure Appraisal: Clinical Validation of a Subject-Specific Mathematical Model.

Tosello Francesco F   Guala Andrea A   Leone Dario D   Camporeale Carlo C   Bruno Giulia G   Ridolfi Luca L   Veglio Franco F   Milan Alberto A  

PloS one 20160324 3


<h4>Introduction</h4>Current evidence suggests that aortic blood pressure has a superior prognostic value with respect to brachial pressure for cardiovascular events, but direct measurement is not feasible in daily clinical practice.<h4>Aim</h4>The aim of the present study is the clinical validation of a multiscale mathematical model for non-invasive appraisal of central blood pressure from subject-specific characteristics.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 51 young male were selected for the present st  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3414505 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4155427 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5527058 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4937742 | biostudies-literature