Dataset Information

Effectiveness of multidisciplinary team case management: difference-in-differences analysis.

ABSTRACT: To evaluate a multidisciplinary team (MDT) case management intervention, at the individual (direct effects of intervention) and practice levels (potential spillover effects).Difference-in-differences design with multiple intervention start dates, analysing hospital admissions data. In secondary analyses, we stratified individual-level results by risk score.Single clinical commissioning group (CCG) in the UK's National Health Service (NHS).At the individual level, we matched 2049 intervention patients using propensity scoring one-to-one with control patients. At the practice level, 30 practices were compared using a natural experiment through staged implementation.Practice Integrated Care Teams (PICTs), using MDT case management of high-risk patients together with a summary record of care versus usual care.Primary measures of intervention effects were accident and emergency (A&E) visits; inpatient non-elective stays, 30-day re-admissions; inpatient elective stays; outpatient visits; and admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Secondary measures included inpatient length of stay; total cost of secondary care services; and patient satisfaction (at the practice level only).At the individual level, we found slight, clinically trivial increases in inpatient non-elective admissions (+0.01 admissions per patient per month; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.01. Effect size (ES): 0.02) and 30-day re-admissions (+0.00; 0.00 to 0.01. ES: 0.03). We found no indication that highest risk patients benefitted more from the intervention. At the practice level, we found a small decrease in inpatient non-elective admissions (-0.63 admissions per 1000 patients per month; -1.17 to -0.09. ES: -0.24). However, this result did not withstand a robustness check; the estimate may have absorbed some differences in underlying practice trends.The intervention does not meet its primary aim, and the clinical significance and cost-effectiveness of these small practice-level effects is debatable. There is an ongoing need to develop effective ways to reduce unnecessary attendances in secondary care for the high-risk population.

SUBMITTER: Stokes J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4838740 | biostudies-other | 2016 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is an important complication associated with several diseases that are rare and life-threatening. TMA is common to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). TTP is defined by a severe deficiency of ADAMTS13, and early treatment is associated with good prognosis. The diagnosis of HUS can be difficult due to the potential multiple etiologies, and the best treatment option in most cases is not well-established yet. The implementation of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) could decrease the time to diagnosis and treatment for HUS and may improve the outcomes of these patients.ObjectiveTo determine the impact of MDT on morbidity and mortality [death or chronic renal replacement therapy (CRRT) requirements], incidence and response time [(RT) defined as the period between hospital admission and the first day of direct therapy administration], length of stay at an intensive care unit (ICU-LOS) and total hospitalization (T-LOS) were also assessed.MethodsWe compared a pre-MDT implementation period (from January/2008 to May/2016) versus post-MDT period (from May/2016 to December/2016). The screening TMA diagnosis was made according the following criteria: hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute renal damage and without ADAMTS13 deficiency. An online chat was implemented to provide instant medical information.ResultsTwenty-eight patients were included. The incidence changed from 2.3 cases/pre-MDT: (all cases: n = 18) to 10 cases/year post-MDT (all cases: n = 10). Two patients died in pre-MDT and post- MDT (11% versus 20%, P = 0.60). From pre-MDT, the number of patients who required CRRT by post-MDT decreased from 7 (39%) to 0, P = 0.03. Similarly, RT, ICU-LOS and T-LOS [median(p25-p75)] decreased from 10 (2-12) days to 0.5 (0-1.5) days, P = 0.04, from 16 (9-30) days to 10 (4-13) days, P = 0.01 and from 33 (22-53) days to 16 (12-32) days, P < 0.01, respectively.ConclusionMDT implementation was associated with a greater number of patients who meet TMA criteria. A decrease in the RT and T-LOS periods were observed and associated with better outcomes in these patients.

Dataset Information

Effectiveness of multidisciplinary team case management: difference-in-differences analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets