Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.


ABSTRACT: This prospective randomized study compared test results of size modulation standard automated perimetry (SM-SAP) performed with the Octopus 600 and conventional SAP (C-SAP) performed with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in glaucoma patients. Eighty-eight eyes of 88 glaucoma patients underwent SM-SAP and C-SAP tests with the Octopus 600 24-2 Dynamic and HFA 24-2 SITA-Standard, respectively. Fovea threshold, mean defect, and square loss variance of SM-SAP were significantly correlated with the corresponding C-SAP indices (P < 0.001). The false-positive rate was slightly lower, and false-negative rate slightly higher, with SM-SAP than C-SAP (P = 0.002). Point-wise threshold values obtained with SM-SAP were moderately to strongly correlated with those obtained with C-SAP (P < 0.001). The correlation coefficients of the central zone were significantly lower than those of the middle to peripheral zone (P = 0.031). The size and depth of the visual field (VF) defect were smaller (P = 0.039) and greater (P = 0.043), respectively, on SM-SAP than on C-SAP. Although small differences were observed in VF sensitivity in the central zone, the defect size and depth and the reliability indices between SM-SAP and C-SAP, global indices of the two testing modalities were well correlated.

SUBMITTER: Hirasawa K 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4857736 | biostudies-other | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8479951 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5588911 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5436878 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6513955 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6248984 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2759404 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7224685 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4855479 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6187012 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5519156 | biostudies-literature