Dataset Information

TSCAN: Pseudo-time reconstruction and evaluation in single-cell RNA-seq analysis.

ABSTRACT: When analyzing single-cell RNA-seq data, constructing a pseudo-temporal path to order cells based on the gradual transition of their transcriptomes is a useful way to study gene expression dynamics in a heterogeneous cell population. Currently, a limited number of computational tools are available for this task, and quantitative methods for comparing different tools are lacking. Tools for Single Cell Analysis (TSCAN) is a software tool developed to better support in silico pseudo-Time reconstruction in Single-Cell RNA-seq ANalysis. TSCAN uses a cluster-based minimum spanning tree (MST) approach to order cells. Cells are first grouped into clusters and an MST is then constructed to connect cluster centers. Pseudo-time is obtained by projecting each cell onto the tree, and the ordered sequence of cells can be used to study dynamic changes of gene expression along the pseudo-time. Clustering cells before MST construction reduces the complexity of the tree space. This often leads to improved cell ordering. It also allows users to conveniently adjust the ordering based on prior knowledge. TSCAN has a graphical user interface (GUI) to support data visualization and user interaction. Furthermore, quantitative measures are developed to objectively evaluate and compare different pseudo-time reconstruction methods. TSCAN is available at https://github.com/zji90/TSCAN and as a Bioconductor package.

SUBMITTER: Ji Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4994863 | biostudies-other | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

TSCAN: Pseudo-time reconstruction and evaluation in single-cell RNA-seq analysis.

Ji Zhicheng Z Ji Hongkai H

Nucleic acids research 20160513 13

When analyzing single-cell RNA-seq data, constructing a pseudo-temporal path to order cells based on the gradual transition of their transcriptomes is a useful way to study gene expression dynamics in a heterogeneous cell population. Currently, a limited number of computational tools are available for this task, and quantitative methods for comparing different tools are lacking. Tools for Single Cell Analysis (TSCAN) is a software tool developed to better support in silico pseudo-Time reconstruc ...[more]

PMID: 27179027

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSingle-cell RNA Sequencing is gaining popularity in recent years. Compared to bulk RNA-Seq, single-cell RNA Sequencing allows the gene expression being measured within individual cells instead of mean gene expression levels across all cells in the sample. Thus, cell-to-cell variation of gene expressions could be examined. Gene differential expression analysis remains the major purpose in most single-cell RNA sequencing experiments and many methods have been developed in recent years to conduct gene differential expression analysis for single-cell RNA sequencing data.ResultsThrough simulation studies and real data examples, we evaluated the performance of five open-source popular methods used for gene differential expression analysis in single-cell RNA sequencing data. The five methods included DEsingle (Zero-inflated negative binomial model), Linnorm (Empirical Bayes method on transformed count data using the limma package), monocle (An approximate Chi-Square likelihood ratio test), MAST (A generalized linear hurdle model), and DESeq2 (A generalized linear model with empirical Bayes approach and also commonly used for bulk RNA sequencing differential express analyses). We assessed the false discovery rate (FDR) control, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve for all five methods under different sample sizes, distribution assumptions, and proportions of zeros in the data.ConclusionsWe found the MAST method performed the best among the five methods compared with the largest AUROC values across all tested sample sizes and different proportion of truly differential expressed genes, when the data followed negative binomial distributions. When the sample size increased to 100 in each group, the MAST method showed the best performance with the highest AUROC regardless of the data distributions. If the excess zeros were first filtered out before the gene differential analyses, the DESingle, Linnorm, and DESeq2 performed relatively better than the MAST and the monocle methods with higher AUROC values.

Dataset Information

TSCAN: Pseudo-time reconstruction and evaluation in single-cell RNA-seq analysis.

Publications

TSCAN: Pseudo-time reconstruction and evaluation in single-cell RNA-seq analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets