Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of target combined chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and system review.

ABSTRACT: The aim of our meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of the target combined chemotherapy for the patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.In accordance with the standard meta-analysis procedures, the patients included in our study were with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer and allocated randomly to receive target combined chemotherapy or the traditional chemotherapy. The search was applied to PubMed, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Cocran's library (from inception to February 2016). All analyses were performed by STATA 12.0, with the odds ratio, hazard ratio, and 95 % confidence interval as the effect measures.Fourteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. A total of 5067 patients with advanced gastric cancer were divided into two arms: traditional chemotherapy arm and target combined chemotherapy arm. A significant improvement for overall survival (hazard ratio was 0.89, 95 % confidence interval: 0.83-0.95) and overall response rate (odds ratio was 1.44, 95 % confidence interval: 1.15-1.81) was observed, but no significant difference was found for progression-free survival (hazard ratio was 0.89, 95 % confidence interval: 0.77-1.00) in the target combined chemotherapy arm. In subgroup analysis, increasing benefits regarding overall survival and progression-free survival were found in anti epidermal growth factor receptor target drugs for selected patients subgroup and anti vascular endothelial growth factor receptor target drugs for unselected patients subgroup, but not in anti epidermal growth factor receptor target drugs for unselected patients subgroup. Besides, some adverse events were increased in the target combined chemotherapy arm.The target combined chemotherapy represented a better overall survival benefit and treatment efficiency and higher incidence of some grade 3-4 adverse events than the traditional chemotherapy for patients with unresectable advanced or recurrence gastric cancer. The anti vascular endothelial growth factor receptor drugs can improve the efficacy in the whole patients with unresectable advanced or recurrence gastric cancer and the anti epidermal growth factor receptor target drugs can only improve the efficacy in the epidermal growth factor receptor positive patients.

SUBMITTER: Zou K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5025570 | biostudies-other | 2016 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of target combined chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and system review.

Zou Kun K Yang Shuailong S Zheng Liang L Yang Chaogang C Xiong Bin B

BMC cancer 20160915 1

<h4>Background</h4>The aim of our meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of the target combined chemotherapy for the patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>In accordance with the standard meta-analysis procedures, the patients included in our study were with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer and allocated randomly to receive target combined chemotherapy or the traditional chemotherapy. The search was applied to PubMed, EMBASE, ...[more]

PMID: 27633381

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundElemene is a natural compound extracted from Zingiberaceae plants, and is used in various cancer. However, the efficacy and safety elemene combined with chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (GC) are lack of systematic assessment.Methodswe searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China Academic Journals (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Journals (CQVIP) and Chinese Biomedical Literature databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing elemene plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in participants with advanced GC and reporting at least one of the following outcomes were selected and assessed for inclusion. JADAD scale was used to assess the quality. Data was screened and extracted by two independent investigators. The primary clinical outcome was overall response rate (ORR); the secondary outcomes were quality of life (QOL) and adverse events (AEs). Analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3.ResultsSixteen RCTs matched the selection criteria, which reported on 969 subjects. Risk ratios (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for ORR, life quality based on KPS, and risk of AEs. Compared to chemotherapy alone, elemene combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of GC may increase the efficiency of ORR(RR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.23-1.60; P < .0001), improve their life quality based on KPS (RR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.45-2.34; P < .00001), and reduce the adverse reactions, including leukopenia(RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62-0.85; P < .00001), neutropenia (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.60-0.95; P = .02), anemia (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60-0.95; P = .02), thrombocytopenia (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.43-0.73; P < .00001). Nausea and vomiting (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.84-1.07; P = .39), diarrhea (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.41-1.15; P = .15), neurotoxicity (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59-1.00; P = .05) and hepatic dysfunction (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.58-1.54; P = .83) were similar between two groups.ConclusionsElemene may have the potential to improve the efficacy and reduce the AEs of chemotherapy for gastric cancer. However, the long-term, high-quality researches with a large sample size in different populations are required.

Project description:Xiao Ai Ping injection (XAPI), extracted from the Chinese herbal medicine Marsdenia tenacissima, is widely used in the adjuvant treatment of tumors in China. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XAPI combined with chemotherapy for treating patients with advanced gastric cancer. Seven databases were searched for relevant studies published up to October 1, 2018, and Review Manager 5.3 software and Stata 12.0 software were used for meta-analysis. Fourteen studies, representing 1097 enrolled patients, were included in our analysis. Compared with chemotherapy alone, combination treatment with XAPI and the XELOX regimen (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) was found to improve the objective response rate (ORR) [RR=1.36; 95%CI (1.10, 1.70); P=0.006], disease control rate (DCR) [RR=1.15; 95% CI (1.04, 1.28); P=0.010], and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) improvement rate [RR=1.51; 95%CI (1.14, 2.00); P=0.004] and to reduce the incidence of leukopenia [RR=0.68; 95%CI (0.55,0.84); P=0.0005], liver damage [RR=0.59; 95% CI (0.37, 0.92); P=0.02], renal impairment [RR=0.39; 95% CI (0.18, 0.85); P=0.02], and hand-foot syndrome [RR=0.56; 95%CI (0.35,0.90); P=0.02]. However, median progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year survival rate, and median overall survival (OS) were not extended by XAPI plus XELOX. Combination treatment with XAPI and the SOX regimen (tegafur plus oxaliplatin) did not improve ORR or DCR, but it did enhance the KPS improvement rate [RR=1.73; 95%CI (1.23,2.43); P=0.002] and reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting [RR=0.66; 95% CI (0.50, 0.88); P=0.004]. XAPI in combination with the FOLFOX regimen (fluorouracil/calcium folinate/oxaliplatin) enhanced only the KPS improvement rate [RR=1.68; 95%CI (1.18,2.39); P=0.004] and had no significant effect on ORR or DCR or the incidence of adverse events. A single study reported that XAPI combined with the CPT-11 regimen (irinotecan) was superior to chemotherapy alone with respect to DCR and also reduced the incidence of leukopenia, liver damage, and hand-foot syndrome during chemotherapy, while prolonging PFS. Finally, one study reported that XAPI combined with the TP regimen (palitaxel plus cisplatin) improved ORR and KPS improvement rate to a greater extent than TP alone. Although the present review has some limitations, the findings suggest that XAPI combined with chemotherapy may represent a beneficial treatment strategy, particularly the combination of XAPI and XELOX.

Project description:BackgroundAstragalus-containing traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is widely used as adjunctive treatment to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in China. However, evidence regarding its efficacy remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Astragalus-containing TCM combined with PBC in AGC treatment.MethodsWe searched for literature (up to July 19, 2020) in eight electronic databases. The included studies were reviewed by two researchers. The main outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), survival rate, quality of life (QOL), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and peripheral blood lymphocyte levels. The effect estimate of interest was the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to detect the robustness of the primary outcome and to calculate the required information size (RIS). Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE profiler.ResultsResults based on available literature showed that, compared with patients treated with PBC alone, those treated with Astragalus-containing TCM had a better ORR (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.15-1.34, P < 0.00001), DCR (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06-1.14, P < 0.00001), 1-year survival rate (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.09-1.82, P = 0.009), 2-year survival rate (RR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.80-5.46, P < 0.0001), and QOL (RR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.70-2.43, P < 0.00001 and MD: 12.39, 95% CI: 5.48-19.30, P = 0.0004); higher proportions of CD3+ T cells and CD3+ CD4+ T cells; higher ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cells; nature killer cells; and lower incidence of ADRs. Subgroup analysis showed that both oral and injection administration of Astragalus-containing TCM increased tumor response. Whether treatment duration was ≥8 weeks or <8 weeks, Astragalus-containing TCM could increase tumor response in AGC patients. Furthermore, Astragalus-containing TCM combined with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy could increase the ORR and DCR; when with cisplatin, it could only increase the ORR.ConclusionCurrent low to moderate evidence revealed that Astragalus-containing TCM combined with PBC had better efficacy and less side effects in the treatment of AGC; however, more high-quality randomized studies are warranted.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42020203486.

Project description:BackgroundThe application of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy(NICT) in treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a subject of considerable research interest. In light of this, we undertook a comprehensive meta-analysis aiming to compare the efficacy and safety of this novel approach with conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in the management of ESCC.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to gather relevant literature on the efficacy and safety of NICT compared to conventional NCT in locally advanced ESCC published before June 2023. Effect indicators, including odds ratios (ORs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were employed to evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to investigate the findings further.ResultsA total of 9 studies qualified for the meta-analysis, all of which investigated the efficacy and safety of NICT compared to conventional NCT. The pooled rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) and major pathologic response (MPR) in the NICT group were significantly higher compared to the NCT group, with values of 26.9% versus 8.3% (P＜0.00001) and 48.1% versus 24.6% (P＜0.00001), respectively. The ORs for achieving pCR and MPR were 4.24 (95% CI, 2.84-6.32, I2=14%) and 3.30 (95% CI, 2.31-4.71, I2=0%), respectively, indicating a significant advantage for the NICT group. Regarding safety outcomes, the pooled incidences of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) in the NICT group were 64.4% and 11.5%, respectively, compared to 73.8% and 9.3% in the NCT group. However, there were no significant differences observed between the two groups in terms of TRAEs (OR=0.67, 95% CI, 0.29-1.54, P=0.35, I2 =58%) or SAEs (OR=1.28, 95% CI, 0.69-2.36, P=0.43, I2=0%). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the NICT and NCT groups regarding R0 resection rates, anastomotic leakage, pulmonary infection, and postoperative hoarseness.Conclusions:Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy demonstrate efficacy and safety in treating resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, additional randomized trials are required to confirm the optimal treatment regimen.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of target combined chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and system review.

Publications

Efficacy and safety of target combined chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and system review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets