Dataset Information

Gene-expression profiling of different arms of lymphatic vasculature identifies candidates for manipulation of cell traffic.

ABSTRACT: Afferent lymphatic vessels bring antigens and diverse populations of leukocytes to draining lymph nodes, whereas efferent lymphatics allow only lymphocytes and antigens to leave the nodes. Despite the fundamental importance of afferent vs. efferent lymphatics in immune response and cancer spread, the molecular characteristics of these different arms of the lymphatic vasculature are largely unknown. The objective of this work was to explore molecular differences behind the distinct functions of afferent and efferent lymphatic vessels, and find possible molecules mediating lymphocyte traffic. We used laser-capture microdissection and cell sorting to isolate lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) from the subcapsular sinus (SS, afferent) and lymphatic sinus (LS, efferent) for transcriptional analyses. The results reveal marked differences between afferent and efferent LECs and identify molecules on lymphatic vessels. Further characterizations of Siglec-1 (CD169) and macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1/CD204), show that they are discriminatively expressed on lymphatic endothelium of the SS but not on lymphatic vasculature of the LS. In contrast, endomucin (EMCN) is present on the LS endothelium and not on lymphatic endothelium of the SS. Moreover, both murine and human MSR1 on lymphatic endothelium of the SS bind lymphocytes and in in vivo studies MSR1 regulates entrance of lymphocytes from the SS to the lymph node parenchyma. In conclusion, this paper reports surprisingly distinct molecular profiles for afferent and efferent lymphatics and a function for MSR1. These results may open avenues to explore some of the now-identified molecules as targets to manipulate the function of lymphatic vessels.

SUBMITTER: Iftakhar-E-Khuda I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5035878 | biostudies-other | 2016 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Gene-expression profiling of different arms of lymphatic vasculature identifies candidates for manipulation of cell traffic.

Iftakhar-E-Khuda Imtiaz I Fair-Mäkelä Ruth R Kukkonen-Macchi Anu A Elima Kati K Karikoski Marika M Rantakari Pia P Miyasaka Masayuki M Salmi Marko M Jalkanen Sirpa S

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20160906 38

Afferent lymphatic vessels bring antigens and diverse populations of leukocytes to draining lymph nodes, whereas efferent lymphatics allow only lymphocytes and antigens to leave the nodes. Despite the fundamental importance of afferent vs. efferent lymphatics in immune response and cancer spread, the molecular characteristics of these different arms of the lymphatic vasculature are largely unknown. The objective of this work was to explore molecular differences behind the distinct functions of a ...[more]

PMID: 27601677

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDespite great advances in surgical techniques for rotator cuff tear (RCT) over the past decades, the postoperative failure rate of RCT is still high due to the poor healing competence of bone-tendon interface (BTI). The lymphatic vasculature plays a regulatory role in inflammatory disease and affects tissue healing. However, whether lymphangiogenesis and the role of lymphatic vasculature in the physiopathological process of rotator cuff （RC）injury remains unknown.MethodsIn this study, we constructed a mouse RC injury model and the BTI samples were collected for measurement. Firstly, immunofluorescence was used to investigate the temporal and spatial distribution of lymphangiogenesis in BTI area at different post-injury time points. Subsequently, the mice of experimental group were gavaged with the lymphatic inhibitors (SAR131675) on the first postoperative day to inhibit lymphangiogenesis, while the control group was treated with the vehicle. At postoperative week 2 and 4, the samples were collected for immunofluorescence staining to evaluate lymphatic angiogenesis inhibition. At postoperative week 4 and 8, The supraspinatus (SS) tendon-humeral complexes were collected for bone morphometric, histological and biomechanical tests to assess the healing outcome of the BTI.ResultsImmunofluorescence results showed that the lymphatic proliferation in the BTI injury area and increased in consistence with the healing time, and the lymphatic hyperplasia area significantly diminished at postoperative week 4. The lymphatic hyperplasia area in the SAR group was significantly lower than that in the control group both at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively. Moreover, the administration of SAR131675 significantly impeded RC healing, as evidenced by lower histological scores, lower bone morphometric parameters, and worse biomechanical properties in comparison with that in control group at postoperative weeks 4 and 8.ConclusionLymphangiogenesis plays a positive role in RC healing, and targeting the lymphatic drainage at healing site may be a new therapeutic approach to promote RC injury repair.The translational potential of this articleThis is the first study to assess the specific role of lymphatic vessels in RC healing, and improving lymphatic drainage may be a potential new therapeutic approach to facilitate repair of BTI. Further, our study provides a reference for possible future treatment of BTI by intervening the lymphatic system.

Dataset Information

Gene-expression profiling of different arms of lymphatic vasculature identifies candidates for manipulation of cell traffic.

Publications

Gene-expression profiling of different arms of lymphatic vasculature identifies candidates for manipulation of cell traffic.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets