Dataset Information

A multiple-image-based method to evaluate the performance of deformable image registration in the pelvis.

ABSTRACT: Deformable image registration (DIR) is essential for adaptive radiotherapy (RT) for tumor sites subject to motion, changes in tumor volume, as well as changes in patient normal anatomy due to weight loss. Several methods have been published to evaluate DIR-related uncertainties but they are not widely adopted. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate intra-patient DIR for two highly deformable organs-the bladder and the rectum-in prostate cancer RT using a quantitative metric based on multiple image registration, the distance discordance metric (DDM). Voxel-by-voxel DIR uncertainties of the bladder and rectum were evaluated using DDM on weekly CT scans of 38 subjects previously treated with RT for prostate cancer (six scans/subject). The DDM was obtained from group-wise B-spline registration of each patient's collection of repeat CT scans. For each structure, registration uncertainties were derived from DDM-related metrics. In addition, five other quantitative measures, including inverse consistency error (ICE), transitivity error (TE), Dice similarity (DSC) and volume ratios between corresponding structures from pre- and post- registered images were computed and compared with the DDM. The DDM varied across subjects and structures; DDMmean of the bladder ranged from 2 to 13 mm and from 1 to 11 mm for the rectum. There was a high correlation between DDMmean of the bladder and the rectum (Pearson's correlation coefficient, R p = 0.62). The correlation between DDMmean and the volume ratios post-DIR was stronger (R p = 0.51; 0.68) than the correlation with the TE (bladder: R p = 0.46; rectum: R p = 0.47), or the ICE (bladder: R p = 0.34; rectum: R p = 0.37). There was a negative correlation between DSC and DDMmean of both the bladder (R p = -0.23) and the rectum (R p = -0.63). The DDM uncertainty metric indicated considerable DIR variability across subjects and structures. Our results show a stronger correlation with volume ratios and with the DSC using DDM compared to using ICE and TE. The DDM has the potential to quantitatively identify regions of large DIR uncertainties and consequently identify anatomical/scan outliers. The DDM can, thus, be applied to improve the adaptive RT process for tumor sites subject to motion.

SUBMITTER: Saleh Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5063075 | biostudies-other | 2016 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The quality of adaptive treatment planning depends on the accuracy of its underlying deformable image registration (DIR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of two DIR algorithms, B?spline?based deformable multipass (DMP) and deformable demons (Demons), implemented in a commercial software package. Evaluations were conducted using both computational and physical deformable phantoms. Based on a finite element method (FEM), a total of 11 computational models were developed from a set of CT images acquired from four lung and one prostate cancer patients. FEM generated displacement vector fields (DVF) were used to construct the lung and prostate image phantoms. Based on a fast?Fourier transform technique, image noise power spectrum was incorporated into the prostate image phantoms to create simulated CBCT images. The FEM?DVF served as a gold standard for verification of the two registration algorithms performed on these phantoms. The registration algorithms were also evaluated at the homologous points quantified in the CT images of a physical lung phantom. The results indicated that the mean errors of the DMP algorithm were in the range of 1.0~3.1mm for the computational phantoms and 1.9 mm for the physical lung phantom. For the computational prostate phantoms, the corresponding mean error was 1.0–1.9 mm in the prostate, 1.9–2.4 mm in the rectum, and 1.8–2.1 mm over the entire patient body. Sinusoidal errors induced by B?spline interpolations were observed in all the displacement profiles of the DMP registrations. Regions of large displacements were observed to have more registration errors. Patient?specific FEM models have been developed to evaluate the DIR algorithms implemented in the commercial software package. It has been found that the accuracy of these algorithms is patient?dependent and related to various factors including tissue deformation magnitudes and image intensity gradients across the regions of interest. This may suggest that DIR algorithms need to be verified for each registration instance when implementing adaptive radiation therapy. PACS numbers: 87.10.Kn, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr, 87.57.nj

Project description:The quality of adaptive treatment planning depends on the accuracy of its underlying deformable image registration (DIR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of two DIR algorithms, B-spline-based deformable multipass (DMP) and deformable demons (Demons), implemented in a commercial software package. Evaluations were conducted using both computational and physical deformable phantoms. Based on a finite element method (FEM), a total of 11 computational models were developed from a set of CT images acquired from four lung and one prostate cancer patients. FEM generated displacement vector fields (DVF) were used to construct the lung and prostate image phantoms. Based on a fast-Fourier transform technique, image noise power spectrum was incorporated into the prostate image phantoms to create simulated CBCT images. The FEM-DVF served as a gold standard for verification of the two registration algorithms performed on these phantoms. The registration algorithms were also evaluated at the homologous points quantified in the CT images of a physical lung phantom. The results indicated that the mean errors of the DMP algorithm were in the range of 1.0 ~ 3.1 mm for the computational phantoms and 1.9 mm for the physical lung phantom. For the computational prostate phantoms, the corresponding mean error was 1.0-1.9 mm in the prostate, 1.9-2.4mm in the rectum, and 1.8-2.1 mm over the entire patient body. Sinusoidal errors induced by B-spline interpolations were observed in all the displacement profiles of the DMP registrations. Regions of large displacements were observed to have more registration errors. Patient-specific FEM models have been developed to evaluate the DIR algorithms implemented in the commercial software package. It has been found that the accuracy of these algorithms is patient dependent and related to various factors including tissue deformation magnitudes and image intensity gradients across the regions of interest. This may suggest that DIR algorithms need to be verified for each registration instance when implementing adaptive radiation therapy.

Project description:The accuracy of deformable image registration tools can vary widely between imaging modalities and specific implementations of the same algorithms. A biomechanical model-based algorithm initially developed in-house at an academic institution was translated into a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system and validated for multiple imaging modalities and anatomic sites.Biomechanical deformable registration (Morfeus) is a geometry-driven algorithm based on the finite element method. Boundary conditions are derived from the model-based segmentation of controlling structures in each image which establishes a point-to-point surface correspondence. For each controlling structure, material properties and fixed or sliding interfaces are assigned. The displacements of internal volumes for controlling structures and other structures implicitly deformed are solved with finite element analysis. Registration was performed for 74 patients with images (mean vector resolution) of thoracic and abdominal 4DCT (2.8 mm) and MR (5.3 mm), liver CT-MR (4.5 mm), and prostate MR (2.6 mm). Accuracy was quantified between deformed and actual target images using distance-to-agreement (DTA) for structure surfaces and the target registration error (TRE) for internal point landmarks.The results of the commercial implementation were as follows. The mean DTA was ? 1.0 mm for controlling structures and 1.0-3.5 mm for implicitly deformed structures on average. TRE ranged from 2.0 mm on prostate MR to 5.1 mm on lung MR on average, within 0.1 mm or lower than the image voxel sizes. Accuracy was not overly sensitive to changes in the material properties or variability in structure segmentations, as changing these inputs affected DTA and TRE by ? 0.8 mm. Maximum DTA > 5 mm occurred for 88% of the structures evaluated although these were within the inherent segmentation uncertainty for 82% of structures. Differences in accuracy between the commercial and in-house research implementations were ? 0.5 mm for mean DTA and ? 0.7 mm for mean TRE.Accuracy of biomechanical deformable registration evaluated on a large cohort of images in the thorax, abdomen and prostate was similar to the image voxel resolution on average across multiple modalities. Validation of this treatment planning system implementation supports biomechanical deformable registration as a versatile clinical tool to enable accurate target delineation at planning and treatment adaptation.

Project description:A deformable registration method capable of accounting for missing tissue (e.g., excision) is reported for application in cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided surgical procedures. Excisions are identified by a segmentation step performed simultaneous to the registration process. Tissue excision is explicitly modeled by increasing the dimensionality of the deformation field to allow motion beyond the dimensionality of the image. The accuracy of the model is tested in phantom, simulations, and cadaver models.A variant of the Demons deformable registration algorithm is modified to include excision segmentation and modeling. Segmentation is performed iteratively during the registration process, with initial implementation using a threshold-based approach to identify voxels corresponding to "tissue" in the moving image and "air" in the fixed image. With each iteration of the Demons process, every voxel is assigned a probability of excision. Excisions are modeled explicitly during registration by increasing the dimensionality of the deformation field so that both deformations and excisions can be accounted for by in- and out-of-volume deformations, respectively. The out-of-volume (i.e., fourth) component of the deformation field at each voxel carries a magnitude proportional to the excision probability computed in the excision segmentation step. The registration accuracy of the proposed "extra-dimensional" Demons (XDD) and conventional Demons methods was tested in the presence of missing tissue in phantom models, simulations investigating the effect of excision size on registration accuracy, and cadaver studies emulating realistic deformations and tissue excisions imparted in CBCT-guided endoscopic skull base surgery.Phantom experiments showed the normalized mutual information (NMI) in regions local to the excision to improve from 1.10 for the conventional Demons approach to 1.16 for XDD, and qualitative examination of the resulting images revealed major differences: the conventional Demons approach imparted unrealistic distortions in areas around tissue excision, whereas XDD provided accurate "ejection" of voxels within the excision site and maintained the registration accuracy throughout the rest of the image. Registration accuracy in areas far from the excision site (e.g., > ∼5 mm) was identical for the two approaches. Quantitation of the effect was consistent in analysis of NMI, normalized cross-correlation (NCC), target registration error (TRE), and accuracy of voxels ejected from the volume (true-positive and false-positive analysis). The registration accuracy for conventional Demons was found to degrade steeply as a function of excision size, whereas XDD was robust in this regard. Cadaver studies involving realistic excision of the clivus, vidian canal, and ethmoid sinuses demonstrated similar results, with unrealistic distortion of anatomy imparted by conventional Demons and accurate ejection and deformation for XDD.Adaptation of the Demons deformable registration process to include segmentation (i.e., identification of excised tissue) and an extra dimension in the deformation field provided a means to accurately accommodate missing tissue between image acquisitions. The extra-dimensional approach yielded accurate "ejection" of voxels local to the excision site while preserving the registration accuracy (typically subvoxel) of the conventional Demons approach throughout the rest of the image. The ability to accommodate missing tissue volumes is important to application of CBCT for surgical guidance (e.g., skull base drillout) and may have application in other areas of CBCT guidance.

Project description:Respiratory motion introduces uncertainties in tumor location and lung deformation, which often results in difficulties calculating dose distributions in thoracic radiation therapy. Deformable image registration (DIR) has ability to describe respiratory-induced lung deformation, with which the radiotherapy techniques can deliver high dose to tumors while reducing radiation in surrounding normal tissue. The authors' goal is to propose a DIR method to overcome two main challenges of the previous biomechanical model for lung deformation, i.e., the requirement of precise boundary conditions and the lack of elasticity distribution.As opposed to typical methods in biomechanical modeling, the authors' method assumes that lung tissue is inhomogeneous. The authors thus propose a DIR method combining a varying intensity flow (VF) block-matching algorithm with the finite element method (FEM) for lung deformation from end-expiratory phase to end-inspiratory phase. Specifically, the lung deformation is formulated as a stress-strain problem, for which the boundary conditions are obtained from the VF block-matching algorithm and the element specific Young's modulus distribution is estimated by solving an optimization problem with a quasi-Newton method. The authors measure the spatial accuracy of their nonuniform model as well as a standard uniform model by applying both methods to four-dimensional computed tomography images of six patients. The spatial errors produced by the registrations are computed using large numbers (>1000) of expert-determined landmark point pairs.In right-left, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions, the mean errors (standard deviation) produced by the standard uniform FEM model are 1.42(1.42), 1.06(1.05), and 1.98(2.10) mm whereas the authors' proposed nonuniform model reduces these errors to 0.59(0.61), 0.52(0.51), and 0.78(0.89) mm. The overall 3D mean errors are 3.05(2.36) and 1.30(0.97) mm for the uniform and nonuniform models, respectively.The results indicate that the proposed nonuniform model can simulate patient-specific and position-specific lung deformation via spatially varying Young's modulus estimates, which improves registration accuracy compared to the uniform model and is therefore a more suitable description of lung deformation.

Dataset Information

A multiple-image-based method to evaluate the performance of deformable image registration in the pelvis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets