Dataset Information

Immune contexture and histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict clinical outcome of lung cancer patients.

ABSTRACT: There is now growing evidence that the immune contexture influences cancer progression and clinical outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). If chemotherapy is widely used to treat patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, it remains unclear how it could modify the immune contexture and impact its prognostic value. Here, we analyzed two retrospective cohorts, respectively composed of 122 stage III-N2 NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy before surgery and 39 stage-matched patients treated by surgery only. In patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the histological characteristics, the expression of PD-L1 protein, and the tumor immune microenvironment (CD8+ T cells, DC-LAMP+ mature dendritic cells, and CD68+ macrophages) were evaluated and their prognostic value assessed together with standard clinical parameters. By analyzing pre- and post-treatment specimens, we did not find any changes in the PD-L1 expression. We also found that the tumor immune contexture in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a similar pattern that the one found in chemotherapy-naive patients, with comparable densities of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and DC-LAMP+ cells and a similar spatial organization. The percentage of residual viable tumor cells and the immune pattern (CD8+ and DC-LAMP+ cell densities) were significantly associated with the clinical outcome and allowed the identification of short- and long-term survivors, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the immune pattern was found to be the strongest independent prognostic factor. In conclusion, this study decrypts the complex interplay between cancer and immune cells in patients undergoing chemotherapy and supports potential beneficial synergistic effect of immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

SUBMITTER: Remark R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5213838 | biostudies-other | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Immune contexture and histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict clinical outcome of lung cancer patients.

Remark Romain R Lupo Audrey A Alifano Marco M Biton Jerome J Ouakrim Hanane H Stefani Alessandro A Cremer Isabelle I Goc Jeremy J Régnard Jean-Francois JF Dieu-Nosjean Marie-Caroline MC Damotte Diane D

Oncoimmunology 20161208 12

There is now growing evidence that the immune contexture influences cancer progression and clinical outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). If chemotherapy is widely used to treat patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, it remains unclear how it could modify the immune contexture and impact its prognostic value. Here, we analyzed two retrospective cohorts, respectively composed of 122 stage III-N2 NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy before surgery and 39 stage-matched patie ...[more]

PMID: 28123901

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:To propose a personalized therapeutic approach in osteosarcoma treatment, we assessed whether sequential [18F]FDG PET/CT (PET/CT) could predict the outcome of patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities after one cycle and two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS:A total of 73 patients with AJCC stage II extremity osteosarcoma treated with 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All patients underwent PET/CT before (PET0), after 1 cycle (PET1), and after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (PET2), respectively. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (corrected for body weight) and the % changes of SUVmax were calculated, and histological responses were evaluated after surgery. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and the Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze whether imaging and clinicopathologic parameters could predict event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS:A total of 36 patients (49.3%) exhibited a poor histologic response and 17 patients (23.3%) showed events (metastasis in 15 and local recurrence in 2). SUVmax on PET2 (SUV2), the percentage change of SUVmax between PET0 and PET1 (?%SUV01), and between PET0 and PET2 (?%SUV02) most accurately predicted events using the ROC curve analysis. SUV2 (relative risk, 8.86; 95% CI, 2.25-34.93), ?%SUV01 (relative risk, 5.97; 95% CI, 1.47-24.25), and ?%SUV02 (relative risk, 6.00; 95% CI, 1.16-30.91) were independent predicting factors for EFS with multivariate analysis. Patients with SUV2 over 5.9 or ?%SUV01 over -?39.8% or ?%SUV02 over -?54.1% showed worse EFS rates than others (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:PET evaluation after 1 cycle of presurgical chemotherapy can predict the clinical outcome of extremity osteosarcoma. [18F]FDG PET, which shows a potential role in the early evaluation of the modification of timing of local control, can be a useful modality for early response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Project description:IntroductionNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy has led to clinical benefits in resectable NSCLC in comparison to chemo-therapy alone. Major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) have been used as surrogates of neoadjuvant therapy response and clinical outcomes. However, the factors affecting the pathological response are still controversial. Therefore, in this study we retrospectively examined MPR and pCR in two different cohorts of NSCLC patients, 14 treated by chemotherapy and 12 by chemo-immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.MethodsIn resected tumor specimens, different histological characteristics were evaluated: necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, presence of organizing pneumonia, granuloma, cholesterol cleft, and reactive epithelial alterations. In addition, we evaluated how MPR impacts on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). In a small group of patients treated by chemo-immunotherapy, a gene expression analysis of the Hippo pathway was performed both in preoperative biopsies and matched post-surgical specimens.ResultsWe observed a better pathological response in the chemo-immunotherapy treated cohort: 6/12 patients (50.0%) achieved a MPR ≤10% and 1/12 (8.3%) achieved pCR both on primary tumor and on lymph nodes. On the contrary, no patient treated with chemotherapy alone achieved pCR or MPR ≤10%. A higher amount of stroma in the neoplastic bed was observed in patients treated with immuno-chemotherapy. Moreover, patients achieving better MPR (including pCR) had significantly improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). After neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, residual tumors showed a remarkable upregulation of genes consistent with the activation of YAP/TAZ. Also, alternative checkpoint, such as CTLA-4, were enhanced.DiscussionOur findings showed that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy treatment improves MPR and pCR thus resulting in better EFS and OS. Moreover, a combined treatment could induce different morphological and molecular changes in comparison to chemotherapy alone, thus giving new insights in the assessment of pathological response.

Dataset Information

Immune contexture and histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict clinical outcome of lung cancer patients.

Publications

Immune contexture and histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict clinical outcome of lung cancer patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets