Dataset Information

Brexpiprazole and cariprazine: distinguishing two new atypical antipsychotics from the original dopamine stabilizer aripiprazole.

ABSTRACT: Brexpiprazole and cariprazine are the latest US Food and Drug Administration approved atypical antipsychotics available in the United States. Both function as partial agonists of the dopamine-2 receptor (D2R), a mechanism of action shared with aripiprazole. However, all three differ in their affinities for the D2R as well as for serotonin receptors (5-HTRs). This paper seeks to delineate these pharmacodynamic and clinical differences amongst the three dopamine partial agonist atypical antipsychotic drugs.PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov searches were used to generate preclinical and clinical evidence for review. Data derived from animal models and human subjects were used to provide insight on clinical mechanisms and adverse effect potentials. Clinical trial data were reviewed to compare clinical efficacy and adverse effects.Efficacies among the three drugs are comparable for their shared indications. Side-effect profile and underlying pharmacodynamic mechanism of action for each drug may differ.Partial agonism of the D2R is a similarity of the three drugs reviewed. Each drug varies in affinity for both the D2R and a diverse group of 5-HTRs, generating a distinct profile of clinical indications and adverse effects for each.

SUBMITTER: Frankel JS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5228714 | biostudies-other | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Brexpiprazole and cariprazine: distinguishing two new atypical antipsychotics from the original dopamine stabilizer aripiprazole.

Frankel Joshua S JS Schwartz Thomas L TL

Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology 20161017 1

<h4>Background</h4>Brexpiprazole and cariprazine are the latest US Food and Drug Administration approved atypical antipsychotics available in the United States. Both function as partial agonists of the dopamine-2 receptor (D<sub>2</sub>R), a mechanism of action shared with aripiprazole. However, all three differ in their affinities for the D<sub>2</sub>R as well as for serotonin receptors (5-HTRs). This paper seeks to delineate these pharmacodynamic and clinical differences amongst the three dop ...[more]

PMID: 28101322

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveStrategies designed to track drug ingestion may improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes in adults with schizophrenia. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole tablets with sensor (AS; Abilify MyCite®) versus generic oral atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) in schizophrenia from the United States payer and societal perspectives over 12 months.MethodsAn individual-level microsimulation was developed to generate individual trajectories using data from a phase 3b multicenter, open-label, mirror-image trial in adults with schizophrenia treated prospectively for 6 months with AS. The patient's clinical characteristics and outcomes were computed as a function of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores. Direct and indirect medical cost estimates were sourced from the literature; EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) utilities were derived using risk equations based on patient and clinical characteristics. Scenario analyses were also conducted to assess outcomes under the assumption of treatment durability over 12 months.ResultsOver 12 months, AS showed a 12.2% improvement in PANSS score. AS had an incremental cost of $2168 and incremental cost savings of $22,343 from the payer and societal perspectives, respectively, with an incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain of 0.0298 versus oral AAPs. Further, AS resulted in a 28.2% reduction in hospitalizations over 12 months. At a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY, the net monetary benefit over 12 months was $25,323 from the payer perspective. Under the assumption of the durability of the treatment effect of AS, the findings were similar to those of the base case analyses, though with greater cost savings and QALYs gained with AS. The results from the sensitivity analyses were consistent with those of the base case analysis.ConclusionAS may be a cost-effective strategy, with lower costs and improved quality of life among patients with schizophrenia over 12 months, from the payer and societal perspectives.

Project description:BackgroundIn many countries of the industrialised world second generation (atypical) antipsychotics have become first line drug treatments for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examine how the efficacy and tolerability of amisulpride differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effects of amisulpride compared with other atypical antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.Search strategyWe searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO.Selection criteriaWe included randomised, at least single-blind, trials comparing oral amisulpride with oral forms of aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.Data collection and analysisWe extracted data independently. For continuous data we calculated weighted mean differences (MD), for dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate.Main resultsThe review currently includes ten short to medium term trials with 1549 participants on three comparisons: amisulpride versus olanzapine, risperidone and ziprasidone. The overall attrition rate was considerable (34.7%) with no significant difference between groups. Amisulpride was similarly effective as olanzapine and risperidone and more effective than ziprasidone (leaving the study early due to inefficacy: n=123, 1 RCT, RR 0.21 CI 0.05 to 0.94, NNT 8 CI 5 to 50). Amisulpride induced less weight gain than risperidone (n=585, 3 RCTs, MD -0.99 CI -1.61 to -0.37) or olanzapine (n=671, 3 RCTs, MD -2.11 CI -2.94 to -1.29). Olanzapine was also associated with a higher increase of glucose (n=406, 2 RCTs, MD -7.30 CI -7.62 to -6.99). There was no difference in terms of cardiac effects and extra pyramidal symptoms (EPS) compared with olanzapine (akathisia: n= 587, 2 RCTs, RR 0.66 CI 0.36 to 1.21), compared with risperidone (akathisia: n=586, 3 RCTs, RR 0.80 CI 0.58 to 1.11) and compared with ziprasidone (akathisia: n=123, 1 RCT, RR 0.63, CI 0.11 to 3.67).Authors' conclusionsThere is little randomised evidence comparing amisulpride with other second generation antipsychotic drugs. We could only find trials comparing amisulpride with olanzapine, risperidone and ziprasidone. We found amisulpride may be somewhat more effective than ziprasidone, and more tolerable in terms of weight gain and other associated problems than olanzapine and risperidone. These data, however, are based on only ten short to medium term studies and therefore too limited to allow for firm conclusions.

Dataset Information

Brexpiprazole and cariprazine: distinguishing two new atypical antipsychotics from the original dopamine stabilizer aripiprazole.

Publications

Brexpiprazole and cariprazine: distinguishing two new atypical antipsychotics from the original dopamine stabilizer aripiprazole.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets