Dataset Information

Oxygenation, inflammatory response and lung injury during one lung ventilation in rabbits using inspired oxygen fraction of 0.6 vs. 1.0.

ABSTRACT: Maintaining adequate oxygenation during one-lung ventilation (OLV) requires high inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2). However, high FiO2 also causes inflammatory response and lung injury. Therefore, it remains a great interest to clinicians and scientists to optimize the care of patients undergoing OLV. The aim of this study was to determine and compare oxygenation, inflammatory response and lung injury during OLV in rabbits using FiO2 of 0.6 vs. 1.0. After 30 minutes of two-lung ventilation (TLV) as baseline, 30 rabbits were randomly assigned to three groups receiving mechanical ventilation for 3 hours: the sham group, receiving TLV with 0.6 FiO2; the 1.0 FiO2 group, receiving OLV with 1.0 FiO2; the 0.6 FiO2 group, receiving OLV with 0.6 FiO2. Pulse oximetry was continuously monitored and arterial blood gas analysis was intermittently conducted. Histopathologic study of lung tissues was performed and inflammatory cytokines and the mRNA and protein of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) p65 were determined. Three of the 10 rabbits in the 0.6 FiO2 group suffered hypoxemia, defined by pulse oximetric saturation (SpO2) less than 90%. Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), acute lung injury (ALI) score, myeloperoxidase (MPO), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), mRNA and protein of NF-κB p65 were lower in the 0.6 FiO2 group than in the 1.0 FiO2 group. In conclusion, during OLV, if FiO2 of 0.6 can be tolerated, lung injury associated with high FiO2 can be minimized. Further study is needed to validate this finding in human subjects.

SUBMITTER: Xu Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5274513 | biostudies-other | 2016 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundContinuous measurement of urinary PO2 (PuO2) is being applied to indirectly monitor renal medullary PO2. However, when applied to critically ill patients with shock, its measurement may be affected by changes in FiO2 and PaO2 and potential associated O2 diffusion between urine and ureteric or bladder tissue. We aimed to investigate PuO2 measurements in septic shock patients with a fiberoptic luminescence optode inserted into the urinary catheter lumen in relation to episodes of FiO2 change. We also evaluated medullary and urinary oxygen tension values in Merino ewes at two different FiO2 levels.ResultsIn 10 human patients, there were 32 FiO2 decreases and 31 increases in FiO2. Median pre-decrease FiO2 was 0.36 [0.30, 0.39] and median post-decrease FiO2 was 0.30 [0.23, 0.30], p = 0.006. PaO2 levels decreased from 83 mmHg [77, 94] to 72 [62, 80] mmHg, p = 0.009. However, PuO2 was 23.2 mmHg [20.5, 29.0] before and 24.2 mmHg [20.6, 26.3] after the intervention (p = 0.56). The median pre-increase FiO2 was 0.30 [0.21, 0.30] and median post-increase FiO2 was 0.35 [0.30, 0.40], p = 0.008. PaO2 levels increased from 64 mmHg [58, 72 mmHg] to 71 mmHg [70, 100], p = 0.04. However, PuO2 was 25.0 mmHg [IQR: 20.7, 26.8] before and 24.3 mmHg [IQR: 20.7, 26.3] after the intervention (p = 0.65). A mixed linear regression model showed a weak correlation between the variation in PaO2 and the variation in PuO2 values. In 9 Merino ewes, when comparing oxygen tension levels between FiO2 of 0.21 and 0.40, medullary values did not differ (25.1 ± 13.4 mmHg vs. 27.9 ± 15.4 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.6766) and this was similar to urinary oxygen values (27.1 ± 6.17 mmHg vs. 29.7 ± 4.41 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.3192).ConclusionsChanges in FiO2 and PaO2 within the context of usual care did not affect PuO2. Our findings were supported by experimental data and suggest that PuO2 can be used as biomarker of medullary oxygenation irrespective of FiO2.

Project description:ObjectivePostoperative pulmonary complications are a series of disorders that can contribute to respiratory distress and prolonged mechanical ventilation postoperatively. We hypothesise that a liberal oxygenation strategy during cardiac surgery leads to a higher incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications than a restrictive oxygenation strategy.MethodsThis study is a prospective, observer-blinded, centrally randomised and controlled, international multicentre clinical trial.ResultsAfter obtaining a written informed consent, 200 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting will be enrolled and randomised to receive either restrictive or liberal oxygenation perioperatively. The liberal oxygenation group will receive 1.0 fraction of inspired oxygen throughout the intraoperative period, including during cardiopulmonary bypass. The restrictive oxygenation group will receive the lowest fraction of inspired oxygen required to maintain arterial partial pressure of oxygen between 100 and 150 mmHg during cardiopulmonary bypass and a pulse oximetry reading of 95% or greater intraoperatively, but no less than 0.3 and not higher than 0.80 (other than induction and when the oxygenation goals cannot be reached). When patients are transferred to the intensive care unit, all patients will receive an initial fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5, and then fraction of inspired oxygen will be titrated to maintain a pulse oximetry reading of 95% or greater until extubation. The lowest postoperative arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen within 48 hours of intensive care unit admission will be the primary outcome. Postoperative pulmonary complications, length of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and 7-day mortality after cardiac surgery will be analysed as secondary outcomes.ConclusionThis is one of the first randomised controlled observer-blinded trials that prospectively evaluates the influence of higher inspired oxygen fractions on early postoperative respiratory and oxygenation outcomes in cardiac surgery patients using cardiopulmonary bypass.

Project description:BackgroundOne-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery frequently disturbs normal systemic oxygenation. However, the effect of anesthetics on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation has not been well established in human study. In this clinical trial, we investigated whether a difference between desflurane-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia can be observed with regard to oxygenation during one-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic surgery.MethodsAdult patients with lung cancer, scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy without preoperative oxygen support, were screened and randomized to receive desflurane or propofol, with remifentanil continuous infusion in both groups. Mechanical ventilation was performed with tidal volume of 8 ml/kg and FIO2 0.5 during two-lung ventilation, and 6 ml/kg and 1.0 during one-lung ventilation, both with positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed preoperatively, during two-lung ventilation, and after 15, 30, 45, and 60 min of one-lung ventilation. The primary endpoint was PaO2 at 30 min after initiating one-lung ventilation. Statistical analyses included the independent t-test for the primary endpoint and a mixed model with a post-hoc analysis to evaluate the serial changes in values.ResultsPatients were recruited between July 9 and December 2, 2014. In total, 103 patients were analyzed (n = 52 in desflurane group and n = 51 in propofol group). The primary endpoint, PaO2 at 30 min of one-lung ventilation was lower in the desflurane group than the propofol group (170 ± 72 vs. 202 ± 82 mmHg; p = 0.039). Serial changes in PaO2 during one-lung ventilation showed lower levels during desflurane anesthesia compared with propofol anesthesia (mean difference, 45 mmHg; 95% confidence interval, 16-75 mmHg; p = 0.003).ConclusionsIn conclusion, desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia resulted in decreased arterial oxygenation compared with that of propofol-remifentanil anesthesia during one-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02191371 , registered on July 7, 2014.

Dataset Information

Oxygenation, inflammatory response and lung injury during one lung ventilation in rabbits using inspired oxygen fraction of 0.6 vs. 1.0.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets