Dataset Information

When, What, and Why of Perioperative Treatment of Potentially Curable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

ABSTRACT: The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 64-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes had been in her usual state of health until she developed symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal bloating, and discomfort in the midepigastrium. Evaluation with a contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a mass in the pancreatic body that was approximately 3.1 cm × 2 cm × 2.1 cm in size with abutment of the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein confluence for less than 180°. The confluence was narrowed but without thrombosis. No tumor-vessel interface was noted at the superior mesenteric artery, celiac artery, or common hepatic artery. Several peripancreatic lymph nodes were observed that measured up to 11 mm × 5 mm. No evidence for distant spread of disease was identified. An upper endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound was performed and fine-needle aspirates of the pancreas mass were positive for malignant cells that were consistent with adenocarcinoma. Chest CT scan without intravenous contrast demonstrated no evidence of metastatic disease. The patient came to the clinic to discuss management of her newly diagnosed malignancy.

SUBMITTER: Perez K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5455317 | biostudies-other | 2017 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

When, What, and Why of Perioperative Treatment of Potentially Curable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Perez Kimberly K Clancy Thomas E TE Mancias Joseph D JD Rosenthal Michael H MH Wolpin Brian M BM

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20161228 5

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own ...[more]

PMID: 28029328

Similar Datasets

Project description:Only 15-20% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients are upfront surgical candidates at presentation, and for this cohort of patients, the 5-year survival is a mere 20% despite adjuvant therapy. Previous data indicate that in clinical practice most of these cases are "borderline-resectable," and there is currently no mature data on perioperative treatment. We performed a retrospective electronic chart review of patients with "borderline-resectable"PDAC treated at an academic comprehensive cancer center, dividing them into groups based on surgery alone, surgery plus neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant plus adjuvant perioperative treatment groups. The objectives were to determine the median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Statistical analysis was performed to assess the association of demographic, tumor traits, and interventions with OS, PFS and DFS. Only surgery followed by adjuvant therapy showed an increase in mOS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51; P<0.001), after adjustment for radiation (yes vs. no), resection margins (R0 vs. R1 or R2), and tumor location (head vs. body or tail). Patients who received adjuvant therapy after surgery had 2.1 times greater odds to be alive at 24 months after diagnosis than those who had surgery alone (P=0.015). PFS and DFS were not statistically significantly different among treatment groups after adjustment. Those whose disease was located in the head of the pancreas had a significantly improved OS (HR =0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.64; P=0.003), PFS (HR =0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.94; P=0.035), and DFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.67; P=0.004). Negative margins led to a significant improvement in PFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P<0.001) and DFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P<0.001). Those who received radiation had a non-significantly improved OS, PFS, and DFS (P>0.05). Our study corroborated that patients treated with adjuvant therapy after surgical resection had an mOS benefit as reported on prior phase III clinical trials. Patients with "borderline-resectable" pancreatic cancer are encouraged to participate in a clinical trial or clinically be treated with adjuvant therapy until more mature results from the ongoing perioperative prospective study are available.

Project description:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a major operative intervention performed most commonly for malignancy in the head of pancreas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utilization of blood transfusion for PD and to determine whether this had prognostic significance in a subset of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on blood transfusion requirement were retrospectively collected for patients undergoing PD from 1998 to 2005. Standard prognostic factors and survival data were also collected in patients with PDAC. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-seventy patients underwent PD. Seventy-six patients (45%) received transfusion. The median (interquartile range) number of units of red cell concentrate (RCC) transfused perioperatively (intraoperatively and within 24 h of surgery) was 1.5 (0.5-2.5). The median preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) was 126 g/dl. The median number of units of RCC transfused perioperatively in patients with Hb <126 g/dl was 2 (1-3); for those with Hb > or = 126 g/dl the median was 0 (0-1); p=0.003. Forty-nine patients who were resected for PDAC were subjected to survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that only posterior resection margin invasion was associated with an adverse outcome (margin positive 198 [143-470] days vs margin negative 398 [303-859] days; p=0.02). Perioperative RCC transfusion requirement was not a significant predictor of survival (transfusion 408 [214-769] days vs no transfusion 331 [217-391] days; p=0.18). Furthermore, RCC transfusion within 30 days of operation was not a significant predictor of poor survival (transfusion 331 [201-459] days vs no transfusion 317 [196-769] days; p=0.43). CONCLUSIONS: PD can be performed with a moderately low requirement for RCC transfusion; however, low preoperative haemoglobin is a predictor for the requirement of RCC transfusion. Administration of RCC transfusion does not appear to be a significant adverse prognostic factor in patients with resected PDAC.

Project description:BACKGROUND:It is unclear whether results from recent trials of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are generalizable to older patients, who are underrepresented. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of surgery and of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in older patients with resectable PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS:We included patients aged ?65?years with upfront resectable PDAC from a prospectively maintained pancreatic cancer registry from 2007 to 2016. Patients were stratified into ages 65-75 and 75+ years. Overall survival (OS) was assessed in treatment comparisons: (A) surgery (n =?636) versus nonsurgical (n =?178), (B) neoadjuvant therapy (n =?139) versus upfront surgery (n =?497), and (C) adjuvant therapy (n =?379) versus surgery alone (n =?118). We compared neoadjuvant (n =?139) versus adjuvant therapy (n =?379) in an exploratory analysis. RESULTS:Nine hundred and three patients had a median age of 73.7 (range, 65-96.6) years. Median OS was 26.6 versus 11.9 months (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj ], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.52; p < .001) in Comparison A groups, 30.7 versus 25.8 months (HRadj , 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96; p = .03) in Comparison B groups, and 26.9 versus 17.4 months (HRadj , 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88; p = .008) in Comparison C groups, respectively. OS benefit in these treatment comparisons was present in age group 75+ with HRadj 0.24 (95% CI, 0.16-0.36; p < .001) in Comparison A and HRadj 0.52 (95% CI, 0.27-1; p = .049) in Comparison B, but not in Comparison C with HRadj 0.68 (95% CI, 0.43-1.08; p = .1). Statistically comparable median OS of patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy stratified by age groups was observed. CONCLUSION:Older patients with resectable PDAC who received surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, or adjuvant therapy appeared to have improved survival outcomes compared with those who did not receive such treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:Older patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in general are underrepresented in large clinical trials and less well studied in terms of the role of surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy. This study collected data on older patients with resectable PDAC from a prospectively maintained single-institutional pancreatic cancer registry of a tertiary referral center from 2007 to 2016. It was found that, with multidisciplinary evaluation, older patients with resectable PDAC who received surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, or adjuvant therapy appeared to have improved survival outcomes compared with those who did not receive such treatment. These results are of substantial importance to practitioners who treat older patients, who are traditionally underrepresented in most clinical trials.

Dataset Information

When, What, and Why of Perioperative Treatment of Potentially Curable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Publications

When, What, and Why of Perioperative Treatment of Potentially Curable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets