Beta-blockers or Digoxin for Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Fauchier L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5490978 | biostudies-other | 2016 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the association between beta-blockers and 1-year clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and further explore this association that differs by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) level.MethodsWe enrolled hospitalized HF patients with AF from China Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events Prospective Heart Failure Study. COX proportional hazard regression models were employed to calculate hazard ratio of beta-blockers. The primary outcome was all-cause death.ResultsAmong 1762 HF patients with AF (756 women [41.4%]), 1041 (56%) received beta-blockers at discharge and 1272 (72.2%) had an LVEF > 40%. During one year follow up, all-cause death occurred in 305 (17.3%), cardiovascular death occurred in 203 patients (11.5%), and rehospitalizations for HF occurred in 622 patients (35.2%). After adjusting for demographic characteristics, social economic status, smoking status, medical history, anthropometric characteristics, and medications used at discharge, the use of beta-blockers at discharge was not associated with all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR): 0.86; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.65-1.12; P = 0.256], cardiovascular death (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.52-1.11; P = 0.160), or the composite outcome of all-cause death and HF rehospitalization (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82-1.14; P = 0.687) in the entire cohort. There were no significant interactions between use of beta-blockers at discharge and LVEF with respect to all-cause death, cardiovascular death, or composite outcome. In the adjusted models, the use of beta-blockers at discharge was not associated with all-cause death, cardiovascular death, or composite outcome across the different levels of LVEF: reduced (< 40%), mid-range (40%-49%), or preserved LVEF (≥ 50%).ConclusionAmong HF patients with AF, the use of beta-blockers at discharge was not associated with 1-year clinical outcomes, regardless of LVEF.
| S-EPMC8501385 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Digoxin is widely used to treat various heart conditions. In order to clarify the association between digoxin and anemia adverse reaction, we inspected case reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between January 2004 and December 2015. These reports involved 75618 atrial fibrillation patients and 15699 heart failure patients. Compared to other therapies, digoxin treatment was significantly more likely to be concurrent with anemia adverse reaction among both atrial fibrillation patients (pooled OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.68, P-value = 0.001) and heart failure patients (pooled OR =1.50, 95% CI 1.33-1.59-, P =4.27×10-5). We further explored previously published evidences and found 821 human genes directly or indirectly interacting with digoxin. Functional analysis indicated that these genes were significantly enriched in the biological processes of iron transport, which are closely related to iron deficiency anemia. Taken together, our retrospective analysis demonstrated the significant association between digoxin treatment and anemia adverse reaction, which should be seriously considered in clinical practice. Functional enrichment analysis on digoxin-related genes warranted subsequent research on the underlying toxicological mechanisms.
| S-EPMC5593620 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBeta-blockers are an essential part of standard therapy in adult congestive heart failure and therefore, are expected to be beneficial in children. However, congestive heart failure in children differs from that in adults in terms of characteristics, aetiology, and drug clearance. Therefore, paediatric needs must be specifically investigated. This is an update of a Cochrane review previously published in 2009.ObjectivesTo assess the effect of beta-adrenoceptor-blockers (beta-blockers) in children with congestive heart failure.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS up to November 2015. Bibliographies of identified studies were checked. No language restrictions were applied.Selection criteriaRandomised, controlled, clinical trials investigating the effect of beta-blocker therapy on paediatric congestive heart failure.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently extracted and assessed data from the included trials.Main resultsWe identified four new studies for the review update; the review now includes seven studies with 420 participants. Four small studies with 20 to 30 children each, and two larger studies of 80 children each, showed an improvement of congestive heart failure with beta-blocker therapy. A larger study with 161 participants showed no evidence of benefit over placebo in a composite measure of heart failure outcomes. The included studies showed no significant difference in mortality or heart transplantation rates between the beta-blocker and control groups. No significant adverse events were reported with beta-blockers, apart from one episode of complete heart block. A meta-analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fractional shortening (LVFS) data showed a very small improvement with beta-blockers. However, there were vast differences in the age, age range, and health of the participants (aetiology and severity of heart failure; heterogeneity of diagnoses and co-morbidities); there was a range of treatments across studies (choice of beta-blocker, dosing, duration of treatment); and a lack of standardised methods and outcome measures. Therefore, the primary outcomes could not be pooled in meta-analyses.Authors' conclusionsThere is not enough evidence to support or discourage the use of beta-blockers in children with congestive heart failure, or to propose a paediatric dosing scheme. However, the sparse data available suggested that children with congestive heart failure might benefit from beta-blocker treatment. Further investigations in clearly defined populations with standardised methodology are required to establish guidelines for therapy. Pharmacokinetic investigations of beta-blockers in children are also required to provide effective dosing in future trials.
| S-EPMC7389334 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Backgroundβ-blockers (BBs) are considered primary therapy in stable heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) without atrial fibrillation (AF); evidence-based benefits of BB on outcome have been documented. However, BBs have not been shown to improve mortality or reduce hospital admissions in HF patients with AF. This study assessed the relationship between BBs at discharge and relevant clinical outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF) patients with AF.MethodsFrom the Korean Acute Heart Failure Registry, 936 HFrEF and 639 HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and AF were selected. Propensity score (PS) matching accounted for BB selection bias when assessing associations.ResultsBB-untreated patients in the overall cohort of HFrEF and HFpEF had greater deteriorated clinical and laboratory characteristics. In the 670 PS-matched cohort of HFrEF patients, incidences of all clinical events at 60 days and 1 year were not different according to use of BBs. In the 470 PS-matched cohort of HFpEF, rehospitalization and composite outcome at 6 months and 1 year more frequently occurred in non-users of BBs. After adjusting for covariates in the multivariable Cox model of matched cohorts, BB was not associated with clinical outcomes at 60 days and 1 year in HFrEF with AF patients. In HFpEF patients with AF, BB use was associated with reduced 6-month (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.74) and 1-year rehospitalization (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.82).ConclusionIn the HFrEF with AF PS-matched cohort, the use of BBs at discharge was not associated with clinical outcome. However, in HFpEF with AF, the use of BB was associated with reduced rehospitalization during the 6-month and 1-year follow up.
| S-EPMC7445305 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Effects of ?-blockers on outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) is still in controversy. METHODS:Searching was conducted by using keywords "atrial fibrillation", and "heart failure" in PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases before November 30, 2017. Prospective studies [i.e. randomized control trials (RCTs), post-hoc analysis of RCTs, prospective cohort studies and registry studies] that studied the effect of ?-blockers and all-cause mortality in patients with CHF and AF were included. The analysis was stratified by study design. RESULTS:We identified 12 studies, including 6 post-hoc analysis of RCTs and 6 observational studies (including prospective registry studies and prospective cohort studies), which enrolled 38,133 patients with CHF and AF. Overall, ?-blockers treatment was associated with significant decrease in all-cause mortality [Risk Ratio (RR) =0.73; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.65-0.82, P?<?0.001]. When stratified by study design, ?-blockers treatment was associated with 34% reduction in patients with CHF and AF in observational study (RR?=?0.66; 95% CI 0.58-0.76, P?<?0. 001), but not in post-hoc analysis of RCT (RR?=?0.87; 95% CI 0.74-1.02, P?=?0.09). CONCLUSIONS:?-blockers treatment was associated with significantly decrease the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with AF-CHF and it was only seen in observational study group, but not in subgroup analysis of RCT group. Further large RCTs are required to verify the effect of ?-blockers treatment on patients with CHF and AF. The main limitation of this study is the lack of individual data on patients in each study.
| S-EPMC6547467 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although evidence based guidelines recommend optimal use of beta blockers in all patients with chronic heart failure unless contraindicated, they are often underutilized and/or prescribed below the recommended dosage in the majority of patients with heart failure. To our knowledge, however, the optimal use of beta-blockers in chronic heart failure is not investigated in Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the utilization and optimization of beta blockers in the management of patients with chronic heart failure in Ethiopia. A prospective observational study was conducted among ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure in Ethiopia. We included adult patients with a diagnosis of heart failure with a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction?<?40% who had been on follow-up for at least 6 months. Patients were recruited into the study during their appointment for medication refilling using simple random sampling technique. All patients were followed for at least 6 months to determine the optimal use of beta blockers. The optimal use of beta blockers was determined according to evidence based guidelines. After explaining the purpose of the study, we obtained written informed consent from all participants. Data were collected through patient interview and review of patients' medical records. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with utilization of beta blockers. A total of 288 patients were included in the study. Out of the total, 67% of the patients were receiving beta blockers. Among the patients who received beta blockers, 34.2% were taking guideline recommended beta blockers while 65.8% were taking atenolol, which is not guideline recommended beta blocker. Among the patients who received guideline recommended beta blockers, only 3% were taking optimal dose. Prior hospitalization [Adjusted Odds ratio (AOR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.76], dose of furosemide?>?40 mg (AOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.76), ischemic heart disease (AOR 3.27, 95% CI 1.66-6.45), atrial fibrillation (AOR 4.41, 95% CI 1.38-14.13) were significantly associated with the utilization of beta-blockers. Despite proven benefit, beta blockers were not optimally used in most of the participants in this study. The presence of ischemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation were positively associated with the utilization of beta blockers while hospitalization and higher diuretic dose were negatively associated with the utilization of beta blockers. Clinicians should attempt to use evidence based beta blockers at guideline recommended target doses that have been shown to have morbidity and mortality benefit in chronic heart failure. Moreover, more effort needs to be done to minimize the potentially modifiable risk factors for underutilization of beta blocker in chronic heart failure therapy.
| S-EPMC7522285 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8570410 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are two conditions that are likely to dominate the next 50 years of cardiovascular (CV) care. Both are increasingly prevalent and associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost. They are closely inter-related with similar risk factors and shared pathophysiology. Patients with concomitant HF and AF suffer from even worse symptoms and poorer prognosis, yet evidence-based evaluation and management of this group of patients is lacking. In this review, we evaluate the common mechanisms for the development of AF in HF patients and vice versa, focusing on the evidence for potential treatment strategies. Recent data have suggested that these patients may respond differently than those with HF or AF alone. These results highlight the clear clinical need to identify and treat according to best evidence, in order to prevent adverse outcomes and reduce the huge burden that HF and AF are expected to have on global healthcare systems in the future. We propose an easy-to-use clinical mnemonic to aid the initial management of newly discovered concomitant HF and AF, the CAN-TREAT HFrEF + AF algorithm (Cardioversion if compromised; Anticoagulation unless contraindication; Normalize fluid balance; Target initial heart rate <110 b.p.m.; Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone modification; Early consideration of rhythm control; Advanced HF therapies; Treatment of other CV disease).
| S-EPMC4670966 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsWe sought to define the underlying mechanisms for atrial fibrillation (AF) during chronic heart failure (HF).Methods and resultsPreliminary studies showed that 4 months of HF resulted in irreversible systolic dysfunction (n = 9) and a substrate for sustained inducible AF (>3 months, n = 3). We used a chronic (4-month) canine model of tachypacing-induced HF (n = 10) to assess atrial electrophysiological remodelling, relative to controls (n = 5). Left ventricular fractional shortening was reduced from 37.2 +/- 0.83 to 13.44 +/- 2.63% (P < 0.05). Left atrial (LA) contractility (fractional area change) was reduced from 34.9 +/- 7.9 to 27.9 +/- 4.23% (P < 0.05). Action potential durations (APDs) at 50 and 90% repolarization were shortened by approximately 60 and 40%, respectively, during HF (P < 0.05). HF-induced atrial remodelling included increased fibrosis, increased I(to), and decreased I(K1), I(Kur), and I(Ks) (P < 0.05). HF induced increases in LA Kv channel interacting protein 2 (P < 0.05), no change in Kv4.3, Kv1.5, or Kir2.3, and reduced Kir2.1 (P < 0.05). When I(Ca-L) was elicited by action potential (AP) clamp, HF APs reduced the integral of I(Ca) in control myocytes, with a larger reduction in HF myocytes (P < 0.05). I(CaL) measured with standard voltage clamp was unchanged by HF. Incubation of myocytes with N-acetylcysteine (a glutathione precursor) attenuated HF-induced electrophysiological alterations. LA angiotensin-1 receptor expression was increased in HF.ConclusionChronic HF causes alterations in ion channel expression and ion currents, resulting in attenuation of the APD and atrial contractility and a substrate for persistent AF.
| S-EPMC2761201 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsTachycardia is a reversible event that may cause hemodynamic decompensation but may not necessarily cause direct damages to the myocardium. To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), whose acute decompensation was tachycardia mediated.Methods and resultsThe Korean Acute Heart Failure registry was a prospective registry that consecutively enrolled 5625 patients with acute HF. Patients were classified into three groups according to the rhythm and aggravating factor: (i) 3664 (65.1%) patients with sinus rhythm (SR), (ii) 1033 (18.4%) patients with AF whose decompensation was tachycardia-mediated, AF-TM (+), and (iii) N = 928 (16.5%) patients with AF whose decompensation was not tachycardia-mediated, AF-TM (-). The primary outcomes were in-hospital and post-discharge 1 year all-cause mortality. At admission, the mean heart rate was 90.8 ± 23.4, 86.8 ± 26.8, and 106.3 ± 29.7 beats per minute for the SR, AF-TM (-), and AF-TM (+) groups, respectively. The AF-TM (+) group had more favourable characteristics such as de novo onset HF, less diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, and higher blood pressure than the AF-TM (-) group. In-hospital mortality rates were 5.1%, 6.5%, and 1.7% for SR, AF-TM (-), and AF-TM (+) groups, respectively. In logistic regression analysis, the AF-TM (+) group had lower in-hospital mortality after adjusting the significant covariates (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.93). The mortality rate did not differ between SR and AF-TM (-) groups. During 1 year follow-up, 990 (18.5%) patients died. In univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses, there was no difference in 1-year all-cause mortality between the three groups.ConclusionsIn patients with HF and AF, patients whose acute decompensation is tachycardia-mediated have better in-hospital, but similar post-discharge outcomes compared with those with SR or those with AF whose decompensation is not tachycardia-mediated.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov NCT01389843.
| S-EPMC8318460 | biostudies-literature