Dataset Information

Haemorrhage Rates After Two Commonly Used Tonsillectomy Methods: a Multicenter Study.

ABSTRACT: Tonsillectomy is a frequently used, low-risk surgical procedure. The post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage occurs rarely, but is a life-threatening complication. Some studies show that the surgical technique affects the haemorrhage rate.To analyse the post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rate, and to determine whether the effect of the surgical technique on the haemorrhage rate exists.We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients who underwent a tonsillectomy in three regional ENT departments in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Tuzla, Zenica and Bihac) between January 1st 2015 and October 31st 2016. Disorders which could affect the post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rate were excluded. Tonsillectomy techniques used in these three centers were the hot technique (monopolar/bipolar forceps dissection and haemostasis) and the combined technique (cold steel dissection with monopolar/bipolar forceps haemostasis).1087 patients that underwent a tonsillectomy were analysed in this study. 864 (79.48%) of those were children. 922 (84.82%) patients were operated using the combined technique, 165 (15.17%) underwent a tonsillectomy using the hot technique. Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage occured in 46 (4.23%) patients. 45 (4.88%) patients had a postoperative haemorrhage after tonsillectomy using the combined technique, whereas haemorrhage occured in 1 patient (0.6%) after using the hot technique. The haemorrhage rate was about eight times lower after tonsillectomy using the hot technique (p=0.012).We conclude that the surgical technique used for tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy with the lowest post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage rate is the hot technique; these results are statistically significant. This technique should be used whenever possible, in order to lower the risk of post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage.

SUBMITTER: Brkic F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5511533 | biostudies-other | 2017 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundStandardised generic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) which measure health status are often unresponsive to change in primary care. Alternative formats, which have been used to increase responsiveness, include individualised PROMs (in which respondents specify the outcomes of interest in their own words) and transitional PROMs (in which respondents directly rate change over a period). The objective of this study was to test qualitatively, through cognitive interviews, two PROMs, one using each respective format.MethodsThe individualised PROM selected was the Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile (MYMOP). The transitional PROM was the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI). Twenty patients who had recently attended the GP were interviewed while completing the questionnaires. Interview data was analysed using a modification of Tourangeau's model of cognitive processing: comprehension, response, recall and face validity.ResultsPatients found the PEI simple to complete, but for some it lacked face validity. The transitional scale was sometimes confused with a status scale and was problematic in situations when the relevant GP appointment was part of a longer episode of care. Some patients reported a high enablement score despite verbally reporting low enablement but high regard for their GP, which suggested hypothesis-guessing. The interpretation of the PEI items was inconsistent between patients. MYMOP was more difficult for patients to complete, but had greater face validity than the PEI. The scale used was open to response-shift: some patients suggested they would recalibrate their definition of the scale endpoints as their illness and expectations changed.ConclusionsThe study provides information for both users of PEI/MYMOP and developers of individualised and transitional questionnaires. Users should heed the recommendation that MYMOP should be interview-administered, and this is likely to apply to other individualised scales. The PEI is open to hypothesis-guessing and may lack face-validity for a longer episode of care (e.g. in patients with chronic conditions). Developers should be cognisant that transitional scales can be inconsistently completed: some patients forget during completion that they are measuring change from baseline. Although generic questionnaires require the content to be more general than do disease-specific questionnaires, developers should avoid questions which allow broad and varied interpretations.

Dataset Information

Haemorrhage Rates After Two Commonly Used Tonsillectomy Methods: a Multicenter Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets