Dataset Information

Developing a Comprehensive Cardio-Oncology Program at a Cancer Institute: The Moffitt Cancer Center Experience.

ABSTRACT: Cardio-oncology is a multidisciplinary field focusing on the management and prevention of cardiovascular complications in cancer patients and survivors. While the initial focus of this specialty was on heart failure associated with anthracycline use, novel anticancer agents are increasingly utilized and are associated with many other cardiotoxicities including hypertension, arrhythmias and vascular disease. Since its inception, the field has developed at a rapid pace with the establishment of programs at many major academic institutions and community practices. Given the complexities of this patient population, it is important for providers to possess knowledge of not only cardiovascular disease but also cancer subtypes and their specific therapeutics. Developing a cardio-oncology program at a stand-alone cancer center can present unique opportunities and challenges when compared to those affiliated with other institutions including resource allocation, cardiovascular testing availability and provider education. In this review, we present our experiences establishing the cardio-oncology program at Moffitt Cancer Center and provide guidance to those individuals interested in developing a program at a similar independent cancer institution.

SUBMITTER: Fradley MG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5523022 | biostudies-other | 2017 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe use of integrative approaches for symptom management is highly prevalent among patients undergoing cancer treatment and among cancer survivors and is increasingly endorsed by clinical practice guidelines. However, access to and implementation of integrative oncology (IO) approaches are hindered by barriers at multiple levels, including logistic, geographic, financial, organizational, and cultural barriers. The goal of this mixed-method study was to examine oncology provider and patient knowledge, beliefs, and preferences in IO to identify facilitators, barriers, and recommendations for implementation of IO modalities.Materials and methodsData sources included patient surveys and provider semistructured interviews. Patients were in active treatment (n = 100) and survivors (n = 100) of heterogeneous cancer types. Patient and survivor surveys interrogated: (1) interest in types of IO approaches; and (2) preferences for delivery modality, frequency, and location. Providers (n = 18) were oncologists and nurse navigators working with diverse cancer types. Interviews queried their knowledge of and attitudes about IO, about their patients' needs for symptom management, and for recommendations for implementation of IO approaches in their clinic. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework to systematically analyze provider interviews.ResultsThe primary interests reported among actively treated patients and survivors were massage therapy, acupuncture, and wellness/exercise. Most patients expressed interest in both group and individual sessions and in telehealth or virtual reality options. Emergent themes from provider interviews identified barriers and facilitators to implementing IO approaches in both the internal and external settings, as well as for the implementation process.ConclusionThe emphasis on mind-body interventions as integrative rather than alternative highlights the importance of interventions as evidence-based, comprehensive, and integrated into health care. Gaining simultaneous perspectives from both patients and physicians generated insights for the implementation of IO care into complex clinical systems within a comprehensive cancer center.

Project description:There continues to be a rise in the proportion of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the recent expansion of criteria for low-dose lung cancer screening. These are increasingly being treated with minimally invasive techniques. Our study aims to compare outcomes of robotic lobectomy (RL) for NSCLC at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI-CCC) to those of open lobectomy (OL), video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VL), or RL as reported in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The first 1,021 patients with NSCLC who underwent RL between 2010 and 2020 were matched with peers from the NCDB who had OL, VL, or RL. Matching was performed based on a propensity score calculated by logistic regression using multiple variables. Surgical outcomes included numbers of examined lymph nodes, performance of mediastinal lymphadenectomy, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using log-rank tests. Most common postoperative complications were persistent air leak, atrial fibrillation, and pneumonia. Median LOS was 4 days, and the 30-day mortality rate was 1% (n=10/1,021). Compared to NCDB patients who underwent OL, NCI-CCC patients had a higher mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (P=0.001), higher rate of mediastinal lymphadenectomy (P<0.001), and shorter median LOS (4 vs. 6 days; P<0.001). There was no difference in 30-day mortality (P=0.176). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no differences in median OS (log-rank P=0.953) or 5-year OS (P=0.774). Compared to NCDB VL, NCI-CCC patients had a higher nodal yield (P<0.001), higher rates of mediastinal lymphadenectomy (P<0.001), and lower conversion rates (4.1% vs. 13.8%, P<0.001). There were no differences in 30-day mortality (P=0.379) or in median LOS (P=0.351). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no differences in median OS (P=0.720) or 5-year OS (P=0.735). NCI-CCC patients were also matched with NCDB RL patients and had a higher nodal yield (P<0.001), higher rates of mediastinal lymphadenectomy (P<0.001), and lower conversion rates (4.1% vs. 9.5%; P <0.001). There were no differences in 30-day mortality (P=0.899) or in median LOS (P=0.252). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no differences in median OS (P=0.484) or 5-year OS (P=0.524). RL for NSCLC performed in an NCI-CCC appears to have improved perioperative outcomes with comparable long-term OS compared to national benchmarks in OL and VL.

Dataset Information

Developing a Comprehensive Cardio-Oncology Program at a Cancer Institute: The Moffitt Cancer Center Experience.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets