Dataset Information

Biomechanical Comparison of a First- and a Second-Generation All-Soft Suture Glenoid Anchor.

ABSTRACT: All-soft tissue suture anchors provide advantages of decreased removal of bone and decreased glenoid volume occupied compared with traditional tap or screw-in suture anchors. Previous published data have led to biomechanical concerns with the use of first-generation all-soft suture anchors.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the load to 2-mm displacement and ultimate load to failure of a second-generation all-soft suture anchor, compared with a first-generation anchor and a traditional PEEK (polyether ether ketone) anchor. The null hypothesis was that the newer second-generation anchor will demonstrate no difference in loads to 2-mm displacement after cycling compared with first-generation all-soft suture anchors.Controlled laboratory study.Twenty human cadaveric glenoids were utilized to create 97 total suture anchor sites, and 1 of 3 anchors were randomized and placed into each site: (1) first-generation all-soft suture anchor (Juggerknot; Biomet), (2) second-generation all-soft suture anchor (Suturefix; Smith & Nephew), and (3) a control PEEK anchor (Bioraptor; Smith & Nephew). After initial cyclic loading, load to 2 mm of displacement and ultimate load to failure were measured for each anchor.After cyclic loading, the load to 2-mm displacement was significantly less in first-generation anchors compared with controls (P < .01). However, the load to 2-mm displacement was significantly greater in second-generation anchors compared with controls (P < .01). There was no difference in ultimate load to failure between the first- and second-generation all-soft suture anchors (P > .05).The newer generation all-soft suture anchors with a theoretically more rigid construct and deployment configuration demonstrate biomechanical characteristics (specifically, with load to 2-mm displacement after cyclic loading) that are improved over first-generation all-soft suture anchors and similar to a traditional solid tap-in anchor. The configuration of these newer generation all-soft suture anchors appears to mitigate the biomechanical concerns of decreased load to failure with first-generation all-soft tissue suture anchors.The theoretical advantages of all-soft anchors may be particularly valuable in revision surgery or in cases where multiple anchors are being placed into a small anatomic area.

SUBMITTER: Erickson J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5524240 | biostudies-other | 2017 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the biomechanical influence of differential loading of suture strands (torque) on the fixation strength of knotted and knotless all-suture anchors.MethodsThe biomechanical strength of 48 all-suture anchors was evaluated for 4 conditions in polyurethane foam blocks: (1) 12 knotted all-suture anchors loaded proportionately, (2) 12 knotted all-suture anchors with 1 suture strand bearing 50% of total force (partial torque), (3) 12 knotted all-suture anchors with 1 strand fixated and the other loaded (full torque), and (4) 12 knotless all-suture anchors with the loop kept open via a fixed rod. Force for 1 mm and 2 mm of displacement and ultimate failure load were assessed.ResultsFor 1 mm of displacement, groups 2, 3, and 4 showed significantly lower forces than group 1 (all P < .001), with no statistically significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (P = .516); for 2 mm of displacement, all groups showed significantly lower forces than group 1 (P < .001), which positively correlated with applied torque. No differences in the mean ultimate loads observed between testing groups 1, 2, and 4 were noted, with 93.3 ± 3.8 N, 91.4 ± 4.7 N, and 92.6 ± 5.6 N, respectively; however, group 3 exhibited a significantly lower mean ultimate load (62.3 ± 1.7 N) than all other groups (P < .001).ConclusionsThe ultimate failure load of knotted and knotless all-suture anchor fixation was partially affected by loading differentials between strands in this validated foam block model. Differential loading of knotted all-suture anchor fixation presented greater initial displacement when compared with symmetrically loaded knotted all-suture anchors. Despite an initial increase in displacement, knotless all-suture anchors showed similar ultimate failure loads to knotted all-suture anchors with strands loaded equally.Clinical relevanceThe role of suture strand loading imbalance on anchor fixation is variable and should be considered during placement and fixation of the repair constructs in a clinical setting.

Project description:BackgroundSuture anchors (SAs) made of human allogenic mineralized cortical bone matrix are among the newest developments in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Biomechanical properties of an allogenic mineralized suture anchor (AMSA) are not investigated until now. The primary objective was the biomechanical investigation of AMSA and comparing it to a metallic suture anchor (MSA) and a bioabsorbable suture anchor (BSA) placed at the greater tuberosity of the humeral head of cadaver humeri. Additionally, we assessed the biomechanical properties of the SAs with bone microarchitecture parameters.MethodsFirst, bone microarchitecture of 12 fresh frozen human cadaver humeri from six donors was analyzed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. In total, 18 AMSAs, 9 MSAs, and 9 BSAs were implanted at a 60° angle. All three SA systems were systematically implanted alternating in three positions within the greater tuberosity (position 1: anterior, position 2: central, position 3: posterior) with a distance of 15 mm to each other. Biomechanical load to failure was measured in a uniaxial direction at 135°.ResultsMean age of all specimens was 53.6 ± 9.1 years. For all bone microarchitecture measurements, linear regression slope estimates were negative which implies decreasing values with increasing age of specimens. Positioning of all three SA systems at the greater tuberosity was equally distributed (p = 0.827). Mean load to failure rates were higher for AMSA compared to MSA and BSA without reaching statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.427). Anchor displacement was comparable for all three SA systems, while there were significant differences regarding failure mode between all three SA systems (p < 0.001). Maximum load to failure was reached in all cases for AMSA, in 44.4% for MSA, and in 55.6% for BSA. Suture tear was observed in 55.6% for MSA and in 22.2% for BSA. Anchor breakage was solely seen for BSA (22.2%). No correlations were observed between bone microarchitecture parameters and load to failure rates of all three suture anchor systems.ConclusionsThe AMSA showed promising biomechanical properties for initial fixation strength for RCR. Since reduced BMD is an important issue for patients with chronic rotator cuff lesions, the AMSA is an interesting alternative to MSA and BSA. Also, the AMSA could improve healing of the enthesis.

Dataset Information

Biomechanical Comparison of a First- and a Second-Generation All-Soft Suture Glenoid Anchor.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets