Dataset Information

The diagnostic value of narrow-band imaging for early and invasive lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to compare the ability of narrow-band imaging to detect early and invasive lung cancer with that of conventional pathological analysis and white-light bronchoscopy. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Sinomed, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for relevant studies. Meta-disc software was used to perform data analysis, meta-regression analysis, sensitivity analysis, and heterogeneity testing, and STATA software was used to determine if publication bias was present, as well as to calculate the relative risks for the sensitivity and specificity of narrow-band imaging vs those of white-light bronchoscopy for the detection of early and invasive lung cancer. A random-effects model was used to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the above modalities in cases in which a high degree of between-study heterogeneity was noted with respect to their diagnostic efficacies. The database search identified six studies including 578 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of narrow-band imaging were 86% (95% confidence interval: 83-88%) and 81% (95% confidence interval: 77-84%), respectively, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity of white-light bronchoscopy were 70% (95% confidence interval: 66-74%) and 66% (95% confidence interval: 62-70%), respectively. The pooled relative risks for the sensitivity and specificity of narrow-band imaging vs the sensitivity and specificity of white-light bronchoscopy for the detection of early and invasive lung cancer were 1.33 (95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.67) and 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.42), respectively, and sensitivity analysis showed that narrow-band imaging exhibited good diagnostic efficacy with respect to detecting early and invasive lung cancer and that the results of the study were stable. Narrow-band imaging was superior to white light bronchoscopy with respect to detecting early and invasive lung cancer; however, the specificities of the two modalities did not differ significantly.

SUBMITTER: Zhu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5525163 | biostudies-other | 2017 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Shared Molecules

Only show the datasets with similarity scores above: 0.5

Threshold

0.5

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Endoscopic ultrasonography is an effective endoscopic examination method for determining the depth of colorectal cancer invasion. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) techniques increase the contrast of vascular structures and more clearly highlight subtle structures on mucosal surfaces, thereby improving the accuracy of endoscopic assessment. This study investigated the diagnostic efficacy of NBI in colorectal laterally spreading tumor (LST) and its submucosal invasion. Methods A total of 224 patients with colorectal LST admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University from January 2015 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into NBI and endoscopic ultrasonography groups according to the different examination methods they received. Subsequently, the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected, and the rates of submucosal invasion of the four subtypes (LST-G-H, LST-G-NM, LST-NG-F, LST-NG-PD) were compared between the two groups. Also, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of judging the depth of LST lesions of the two examination methods were compared, taking the results of pathological tissue examination as the gold standard. Results This study enrolled 224 patients with LST (mean onset age: 57.98±6.48 years), including 123 males and 101 females. In terms of tumor location, 21 cases were located in the cecum, 22 cases in the ascending colon, 38 cases in the transverse colon, 11 cases in the descending colon, 12 cases in the descending sigmoid junction, 23 cases in the sigmoid colon, and 97 cases in the rectum. The sizes of the tumors ranged from 18.81 to 52.88 mm. Moreover, there were 21 cases of lesion infiltration into the submucosa, and the infiltration rate was 9.38%. Furthermore, the accuracy of NBI in diagnosing colorectal LST was significantly higher than that of endoscopic ultrasonography (87.05% vs. 57.14%); NBI was more accurate than endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative diagnosis of LST lesion depth in the rectal, non-rectal, granular (LST-G), non-granular (LST-NG), <40, and ≥40 mm groups. Conclusions Gastrointestinal NBI has a superior accuracy rate and value than endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing colorectal LST, tumor lesion depth, and submucosal invasion. Therefore, gastrointestinal NBI deserves to be promoted in clinical work.

Project description:BackgroundIn recent years, two new narrow-band imaging (NBI) classifications have been proposed: The NBI international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification and Japanese NBI expert team (JNET) classification. Most validation studies of the two new NBI classifications were conducted in classification setting units by experienced endoscopists, and the application of use in different centers among endoscopists with different endoscopy skills remains unknown.AimTo evaluate clinical application and possible problems of NICE and JNET classification for the differential diagnosis of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.MethodsSix endoscopists with varying levels of experience participated in this study. Eighty-seven consecutive patients with a total of 125 lesions were photographed during non-magnifying conventional white-light colonoscopy, non-magnifying NBI, and magnifying NBI. The three groups of endoscopic pictures of each lesion were evaluated by the six endoscopists in randomized order using the NICE and JENT classifications separately. Then we calculated the six endoscopists' sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for each category of the two classifications.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of JNET classification type 1 and 3 were similar to NICE classification type 1 and 3 in both the highly experienced endoscopist (HEE) and less-experienced endoscopist (LEE) groups. The specificity of JNET classification type 1 and 3 and NICE classification type 3 in both the HEE and LEE groups was > 95%, and the overall interobserver agreement was good in both groups. The sensitivity of NICE classification type 3 lesions for diagnosis of SM-d carcinoma in the HEE group was significantly superior to that in the LEE group (91.7% vs 83.3%; P = 0.042). The sensitivity of JNET classification type 2B lesions for the diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia or superficial submucosal invasive carcinoma in the HEE and LEE groups was 53.8% and 51.3%, respectively. Compared with other types of JNET classification, the diagnostic ability of type 2B was the weakest.ConclusionThe treatment strategy of the two classification type 1 and 3 lesions can be based on the results of endoscopic examination. JNET type 2B lesions need further examination.

Project description:Background: Narrow band imaging (NBI), an endoscopic technique featuring an augmented definition of microvasculature and mucosal patterns. NBI is increasingly advocated as a tool to characterize neoplasia and intestinal metaplasia in endoscopic standards, such as for colorectal polyps and tumors. Recently NBI has also been studied in the detection of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC). Here we aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of NBI for the diagnosis of NPC. Methods: A meta-analysis of studies comparing narrow-band imaging and white light endoscopy in the diagnosis of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma was performed. The review process involved two independent investigators. The databases used were MEDLINE, PubMed, the Cochrane library, Embase, and the Web of Science. Statistical analysis was performed with OpenMetaAnalyst, MetaDiSc version 1.4, and Medcalc version 17.9.7. Results: Five studies including 2480 patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity for narrow-band imaging were 0.90 (0.73-0.97) and 0.95 (0.81-0.99) respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 18.82 (0.31-82.1) and 0.08 (0.02-0.31). For white light endoscopy, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (0.58-0.89) and 0.91 (0.79-0.96). The positive likelihood ratio was 7.61 (3.61-16.04), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.21 (0.11-0.39). The odds ratio for detection rates between narrow-band imaging and white light endoscopy was 4.29 (0.56-33.03, p = 0.16). Area under the curve for narrow-band imaging was 0.98 (SE: 0.02), and for white light it was 0.93 (SE: 0.03). There was no significant difference in the receiver operating characteristic curves between the two modalities (p = 0.14). Conclusion: Narrow-band imaging showed a higher sensitivity and positive likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, there was no significant difference in detection rates compared to white light endoscopy. Further investigation with a uniform diagnostic criteria and terminology is needed for narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.